Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-water-connection-delay [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Water connection stuck? File one RTI ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** New water connection / sewerage application stuck at Municipal Water Board for months? File an RTI under §6(1) RTI Act 2005. Free template, JJM/AMRUT timelines. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Short version.** New **household water + sewerage connection** is provided by **Municipal Water Boards** (Bengaluru BWSSB, Delhi DJB, Mumbai MCGM, Hyderabad HMWSSB, Chennai CMWSSB) under city-specific Water Acts. **Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM)** and **AMRUT** add federal funding. Typical SLA: **30-60 days** from application + plumbing inspection. RTI to **PIO of Water Board / ULB** with **₹10 fee** legally forces a written reply within **30 days** under §7(1) RTI Act 2005. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A real story ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pradeep applied for new BWSSB water connection at his Whitefield home in February. //" | ||
| + | |||
| + | He filed RTI to **BWSSB Sub-Division PIO**. **24 days later** BWSSB replied: plumber visited on day 30 but couldn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statute ===== | ||
| + | - **State Water Supply / Sewerage Acts** (Karnataka 2003, Delhi 1998, Mumbai/ | ||
| + | - **Jal Jeevan Mission Operational Guidelines** (Ministry of Jal Shakti). | ||
| + | - **AMRUT 2.0** (MoHUA). | ||
| + | - §6(1) + §7(1) RTI Act. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Copy-ready RTI ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, PIO, [BWSSB / DJB / MCGM / HMWSSB / CMWSSB / ULB], [Address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: §6(1) RTI Act — water/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please provide: | ||
| + | 1. Current status + stage. | ||
| + | 2. Plumbing inspection date (if conducted) + report. | ||
| + | 3. Reason for delay beyond [Water Board] SLA of [30/45/60] days. | ||
| + | 4. Name + designation of dealing JE/AE. | ||
| + | 5. Connection charges + procedure. | ||
| + | 6. JJM / AMRUT subsidy applicable. | ||
| + | 7. Expected installation date. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citizen. Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed. | ||
| + | [Name + signature + address + date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common scenarios ===== | ||
| + | - Plumbing inspection skipped → reinspection demand. | ||
| + | - Pipe-laying disputed (road cutting NOC) → ULB coordination RTI. | ||
| + | - Sewerage connection delay → separate ASCR officer. | ||
| + | - Disputed bill on existing connection → meter reading log. | ||
| + | - Tanker billing during interruption → compensation under ULB regulations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law ===== | ||
| + | - **//Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar//, (1991) 1 SCC 598** — Right to clean water = Art. 21. | ||
| + | - CIC //Water Board v. Citizen// (2018) — ULB directed to disclose pendency. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
| + | ==== JJM 100% rural coverage — village without piped supply? ==== | ||
| + | File RTI to district JJM nodal officer. | ||
| + | ==== Borewell permission RTI? ==== | ||
| + | State groundwater regulator. | ||
| + | ==== Apartment bulk connection — different SLA? ==== | ||
| + | Yes — typically 60-90 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| + | Water = right; municipal inertia = RTI fix. ₹10. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **File the RTI.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | - RTI Act 2005, JJM Guidelines, AMRUT 2.0. | ||
| + | - //Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar// (1991) 1 SCC 598. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 🔗 Related guides ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||