Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-trademark-application [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Trademark application stuck? File one RTI to CGPDTM ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** Trademark application stuck? File one RTI to CGPDTM — RTI to CGPDTM Mumbai. 24 days later the registry replied: examiner allocated; FER expected within… | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Short version.** **Trademark application** at **CGPDTM (Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks)** typical timeline: examination 3-6 months, advertisement 3 months, registration 1-3 years. If stuck without movement, RTI to **PIO of CGPDTM Regional Office** with **₹10 fee** legally forces a written reply within **30 days** under §7(1) RTI Act 2005. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Real story ===== | ||
| + | Ritu applied for a trademark for her boutique brand in 2021. Status //" | ||
| + | |||
| + | RTI to CGPDTM Mumbai. **24 days later** the registry replied: examiner allocated; FER expected within 60 days. FER received; trademark advertised 4 months later. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statute ===== | ||
| + | - **Trade Marks Act 1999** + **Rules 2017**. | ||
| + | - **CGPDTM Service Quality Charter** — examination 3-6 months. | ||
| + | - §6(1) + §7(1) RTI Act. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Copy-ready RTI ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, PIO, CGPDTM Regional Office [Mumbai/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: §6(1) RTI Act — trademark application status | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please provide: | ||
| + | 1. Current status + stage (examination/ | ||
| + | 2. Examiner name + allocation date. | ||
| + | 3. Reason for delay beyond CGPDTM Service Quality Charter SLA. | ||
| + | 4. Date of expected next step. | ||
| + | 5. Opposition status (if advertised). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citizen. Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed. | ||
| + | [Name + signature + address + date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common scenarios ===== | ||
| + | - Examination not allocated. | ||
| + | - FER (First Examination Report) reply pending hearing. | ||
| + | - Opposition filed — date of hearing. | ||
| + | - Advertised in journal — no further action. | ||
| + | - Renewal at 10 yr. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law ===== | ||
| + | - **CIC //CGPDTM// (2018)** — disclosure of pendency reports. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
| + | ==== Class system — Nice Classification? | ||
| + | 45 classes; one application per class. | ||
| + | ==== Online vs offline filing? ==== | ||
| + | Online via ipindia.gov.in is standard. | ||
| + | ==== Renewal? ==== | ||
| + | 10 years initial + renewable 10-year blocks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| + | TM is brand protection. RTI breaks examination backlog. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | - Trade Marks Act 1999; Rules 2017. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 🔗 Related guides ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||