no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-track-swadesh-darshan-prashad-sasci [2026/05/05 03:31] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(How citizens use RTI to track Swadesh Darshan, PRASHAD, SASCI projects in their district. Sample letter, PIO targets, the records to demand. 2026.)}} | ||
| + | ====== How citizens use RTI to track Swadesh Darshan, PRASHAD, SASCI projects ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Quick answer.** Every project sanctioned under **Swadesh Darshan 1.0**, **Swadesh Darshan 2.0**, **CBDD**, **PM-JUGA tribal homestays**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The right PIO per scheme ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Scheme ^ Primary PIO ^ Secondary PIO ^ | ||
| + | | **Swadesh Darshan 1.0 (closed)** | PIO, Ministry of Tourism (records archive) | PIO, State Tourism Development Corporation (execution records) | | ||
| + | | **Swadesh Darshan 2.0** | PIO, Ministry of Tourism (sanction + CSMC) | PIO, State Tourism Department (SPP + execution) | | ||
| + | | **CBDD** | PIO, Ministry of Tourism (challenge round + sanction) | PIO, State Tourism Development Corporation (execution) | | ||
| + | | **PM-JUGA tribal homestays** | PIO, Ministry of Tourism (sanction) | PIO, State Tribal Welfare Department + State Tourism Department (cluster delivery) | | ||
| + | | **PRASHAD** | PIO, Ministry of Tourism (CSMC sanction) | PIO, State Tourism Department + Local body / temple board (execution + maintenance) | | ||
| + | | **SASCI Iconic Tourist Centres** | PIO, Department of Expenditure, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Records you can demand ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Sanction order** — date, sanction reference, cost build-up, scheme component, scheme guidelines applied | ||
| + | * **DPR** — the Detailed Project Report as approved by the CSMC / DoE | ||
| + | * **Tender + technical evaluation minutes** — contractor selection trail | ||
| + | * **Awarded contractor + contract value** — work order date, scope, milestones | ||
| + | * **Quarterly / annual progress reports** filed with the Ministry / DoE | ||
| + | * **Disbursement schedule** — milestone-linked tranches, dates of release, amounts disbursed | ||
| + | * **Completion certificates** — by component | ||
| + | * **O&M plan** — post-completion arrangement, | ||
| + | * **CAG audit observations** — if any, with management replies | ||
| + | * **Concurrent monitoring reports** — internal-audit / quality-supervision records | ||
| + | * **For SASCI** — loan-disbursement schedule + repayment terms; State' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample RTI letter ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer, | ||
| + | [Ministry of Tourism / Department of Expenditure / State Tourism Department], | ||
| + | [Office address], | ||
| + | [PIN] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information | ||
| + | Act, 2005 — [Scheme name] sanctioned project at [destination | ||
| + | / district / state] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Date: [DD MMMM YYYY] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Respected Sir / Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. I, [Your full name], a citizen of India, am filing this application | ||
| + | under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 in respect | ||
| + | of the [Scheme name — e.g., PRASHAD / Swadesh Darshan 2.0 / CBDD / | ||
| + | SASCI] sanctioned project at [destination / district / state]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Project reference (if known): [sanction order number / DPR | ||
| + | reference / project name]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. I respectfully request the following information: | ||
| + | |||
| + | (a) Certified copy of the sanction order with cost build-up | ||
| + | and scheme component; | ||
| + | (b) Certified copy of the Detailed Project Report (DPR) as | ||
| + | | ||
| + | (c) Quarterly progress reports filed to the Ministry / DoE | ||
| + | since sanction; | ||
| + | (d) Disbursement schedule — milestone-linked tranches, dates | ||
| + | of release, amounts disbursed; | ||
| + | (e) Tender documents + technical-evaluation minutes; | ||
| + | (f) Awarded contractor name + contract value + work order date; | ||
| + | (g) Component-wise completion certificates issued to date; | ||
| + | (h) Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan post-completion; | ||
| + | (i) Any CAG audit observations + management replies; | ||
| + | (j) Concurrent monitoring / internal audit reports; | ||
| + | (k) Names + designations of officials in the | ||
| + | | ||
| + | (l) [For SASCI] loan terms + repayment schedule + Memorandum | ||
| + | of Understanding between Centre and State. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Fee: Rs 10 application fee enclosed by way of Indian Postal | ||
| + | Order. [If BPL: §7(5) exemption claimed; BPL certificate copy | ||
| + | enclosed.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Severability: | ||
| + | the RTI Act, the remainder is requested under Section 10(1) and | ||
| + | 10(2) with a reasoned severance order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. Transfer: Where any part lies outside your office, please | ||
| + | transfer under Section 6(3) within 5 days with intimation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 7. Section 8 risks pre-empted: | ||
| + | - Section 8(1)(d) " | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | - Section 8(1)(j) does NOT apply to records that are | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 8. Please supply within 30 days under Section 7(1). In the event | ||
| + | of silence, the non-response shall be treated as a deemed refusal | ||
| + | under Section 7(2) and a First Appeal under Section 19(1) shall | ||
| + | follow. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ([Your name]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Address + phone + email] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | → Or use the [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Day 30 onwards — the appeal ladder ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Day 30**: PIO must reply with records or refusal citing specific §8(1) clause + harm test. | ||
| + | * **Day 31**: If no reply → **deemed refusal** under §7(2). File **First Appeal under §19(1)** to the FAA. See [[https:// | ||
| + | * **Day 31–60**: FAA decides within 30 days (extendable to 45). FAA can order **free-of-cost supply** under §7(6). | ||
| + | * **Day 91+**: **Second Appeal under §19(3)** to **Central Information Commission** (central authorities) or **State Information Commission** (state authorities) within 90 days. Plead **§20 penalty** up to [financial detail removed] on the PIO if the refusal was malafide. | ||
| + | |||
| + | → [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When the PIO refuses on §8(1)(d) commercial confidence ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the most common refusal pattern for tourism-scheme RTIs. The standard counter-citations: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. WBIC**, Calcutta HC 2015 — concession agreements + procurement records are not §8(1)(d) trade secrets without demonstrable competitive harm. | ||
| + | - **Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry**, (2016) 5 SCC 136 — public-interest override on commercial-confidence claims; regulator-administered scheme records do not enjoy §8(1)(d) protection. | ||
| + | - **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay**, | ||
| + | - **Section 8(2)** RTI Act — public-interest override. Public investment in a tourism destination + public visitor benefit + public infrastructure on the ground = public interest in disclosure outweighs §8(1)(d) competitive-harm even where established. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use these in your **First Appeal** under §19(1). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is the DPR a public document? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes.** DPRs of central-scheme projects are §6(1) RTI Act + §4(1)(b)(xii) records. Routine refusal under §8(1)(d) is an appealable defect. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Who can file an RTI on these schemes? ==== | ||
| + | **Any Indian citizen.** §6(2) RTI Act bars the PIO from asking for reasons (with limited contact-information exception). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What's the fee? ==== | ||
| + | **Rs 10** for central authorities (Ministry of Tourism, Department of Expenditure). State RTI rules govern state authorities — usually Rs 10–50. **BPL applicants pay zero** under §7(5). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I file an RTI for an SD 1.0 project that closed years ago? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes.** Records are typically retained 5–10+ years under government records-retention norms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I file an RTI on the State' | ||
| + | **Yes.** SPPs submitted by States to the Ministry are public records. §6(1) RTI to the State Tourism Department + Ministry of Tourism PIO surfaces both ends. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if the project is sanctioned but visibly stalled on the ground? ==== | ||
| + | File an RTI surfacing the **last quarterly progress report** + **CSMC / DoE observations** + **revised timeline**. Most projects move once a written record of citizen-awareness exists. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can my MP or MLA help? ==== | ||
| + | Yes — engage them in parallel with the RTI. The RTI gives you documents; the elected representative gives you the political channel. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== If the project quality is poor after completion, what's the route? ==== | ||
| + | File an RTI surfacing the **completion certificate** + **O&M plan** + **defect-liability period** of the contractor. Grievance to State Tourism Department in parallel. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen-action checklist ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **[ ]** Identify the scheme (SD 1.0 / SD 2.0 / CBDD / PM-JUGA / PRASHAD / SASCI) | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Identify the right PIO (Ministry / DoE / State Tourism) | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Customise sample RTI with project name + district + sanction reference (if known) | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Rs 10 IPO purchased OR BPL certificate copy | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Speed Post (AD) tracking number saved | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Calendar reminder set for Day 30 + Day 45 + Day 90 | ||
| + | - **[ ]** First Appeal letter pre-drafted as Day 31 fallback ([[https:// | ||
| + | - **[ ]** Second Appeal forum identified (CIC for central, SIC for state) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The Right to Information Act, 2005 — §§4(1)(b)(xii), | ||
| + | * Ministry of Tourism — Swadesh Darshan / SD 2.0 / CBDD / PRASHAD / PM-JUGA operational guidelines | ||
| + | * Department of Expenditure, | ||
| + | * //Bhagat Singh v. Chief Information Commissioner//, | ||
| + | * //Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. WBIC//, Calcutta HC 2015 | ||
| + | * //RBI v. Jayantilal N. Mistry//, (2016) 5 SCC 136 | ||
| + | * //CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay//, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {REVIEWED} | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 4 May 2026 — RTI Wiki editorial team.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||