Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-tds-credit-not-reflecting [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== TDS not in Form 26AS / AIS? File one RTI ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** TDS deducted by employer / bank but not reflecting in Form 26AS / AIS? File an RTI under §6 RTI Act 2005 to Income Tax Dept. Free template. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Short version.** If your **employer / bank / payer** deducted TDS but it's not showing in your **Form 26AS / AIS / TIS** at incometax.gov.in, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A real story ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Vandana' | ||
| + | |||
| + | She filed RTI to **TDS-CPC + her bank's TAN PIO**. **20 days later** TDS-CPC confirmed: bank's Q4 26Q return had her PAN typo' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statute ===== | ||
| + | - **Income Tax Act 1961** §192-194 (TDS), §200 (return filing), §201 (deductor liability). | ||
| + | - **CBDT Circulars on Form 26AS / AIS**. | ||
| + | - §6(1) + §7(1) RTI Act. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Copy-ready RTI ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, PIO, Income Tax (TDS-CPC) / Jurisdictional Assessing Officer | ||
| + | [+ Bank/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: §6(1) RTI Act — TDS credit not reflecting in Form 26AS | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | TDS amount | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please provide: | ||
| + | 1. Whether the deductor filed Form 26Q/24Q for the relevant | ||
| + | quarter on time. | ||
| + | 2. PAN, amount, and section under which TDS was reported. | ||
| + | 3. Reason for non-reflection in my Form 26AS / AIS. | ||
| + | 4. Procedure to compel deductor under §201 / §272A. | ||
| + | 5. Refund processing timeline once reflected. | ||
| + | 6. Name + designation of dealing officer at TDS-CPC. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citizen of India. | ||
| + | Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed. | ||
| + | [Name + signature + address + date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step-by-step ===== | ||
| + | - File via **rtionline.gov.in → Income Tax Dept** (Central). | ||
| + | - ₹10 fee. | ||
| + | - 30-day deadline. | ||
| + | - Parallel: file with deductor; CBDT also has online TDS-mismatch grievance. | ||
| + | - First Appeal → CIT (FAA); Second Appeal → CIC. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common scenarios ===== | ||
| + | - Wrong PAN by deductor → corrected return. | ||
| + | - Quarter return not filed → §201 default + interest. | ||
| + | - TDS on FD but amount lower than tax slab → refund procedure. | ||
| + | - Foreign TDS via DTAA → separate procedure. | ||
| + | - TRACES password issues → RTI to NSDL. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law ===== | ||
| + | - **// | ||
| + | - CIC //TDS-CPC v. Citizen// (2018) — disclosure of deductor return status. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
| + | ==== Can I file ITR without the TDS in 26AS? ==== | ||
| + | Yes — claim it; IT Dept will verify and ask deductor. | ||
| + | ==== Time limit for deductor correction? ==== | ||
| + | Within FY ideally; later via revised return. | ||
| + | ==== Penalty on deductor? ==== | ||
| + | §201 — interest 1% + 1.5% per month + §272A penalty. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| + | TDS mismatch = stuck refund. RTI compels both deductor + dept. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **File the RTI.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | - Income Tax Act 1961 §192-201, §272A. | ||
| + | - //Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages v. CIT// (2007). | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 🔗 Related guides ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||