Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-road-work-status [2026/07/03 01:50] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Road work incomplete? Make the PWD answer with one RTI ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Short version.** If a **road in your locality** has been "under repair" | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A real story you'll recognise ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Manish noticed that the **2.4 km link road** in his Pune locality had been "under construction" | ||
| + | |||
| + | He filed an RTI to the **Pune PWD Sub-Division**. **Twenty-five days later** the reply: a 12-page disclosure with **contractor name, sanctioned ₹2.8 crore, only ₹2.1 crore released, work measured at 67% complete, contractor in default, ₹85K penalty levied but not deducted, no third-party quality test conducted**. Manish forwarded to the local Pune Mirror reporter — a story ran the next week. The Sub-Divisional Engineer was transferred; | ||
| + | |||
| + | Roads are administered by: | ||
| + | * **State PWD** (state highways + major district roads) | ||
| + | * **NHAI** (national highways) — 1956 Act | ||
| + | * **PMGSY** (rural roads) — Ministry of Rural Development | ||
| + | * **Municipal Corporation / ULB** (urban municipal roads) | ||
| + | * **Panchayat** (village roads) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each has its own PIO + works register. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What an RTI does ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **30-day clock** under §7(1). | ||
| + | - **§20(1) personal liability**. | ||
| + | - **Comprehensive contractor + quality disclosure** — surfaces ghost works, quality fraud, undeclared subcontracting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The statute ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§6(1)** RTI Act. | ||
| + | * **§7(1)** — 30 days. | ||
| + | * **§4(1)(b)(xii)** — works register suo motu disclosable. | ||
| + | * **State PWD Works Manuals** — set quality-test, | ||
| + | * **NHAI Act 1988** + **CPWD Works Manual** — for Central works. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Copy-ready RTI ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer (PIO), | ||
| + | Office of the [Executive Engineer / Sub-Divisional Engineer], | ||
| + | [State PWD / NHAI / PMGSY / Municipal Engineering Cell], | ||
| + | [Locality / District] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: §6(1) RTI Act 2005 — status of road construction at | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please provide: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Project name + sanction reference + sanctioning authority. | ||
| + | 2. Sanctioned amount, released amount, balance. | ||
| + | 3. Contractor name + address + GST/PAN. | ||
| + | 4. Sub-contractor names (if any) and the procedure followed for | ||
| + | sub-contracting under PWD Works Manual. | ||
| + | 5. Date of work-order, scheduled completion date, actual progress | ||
| + | as on date of disposal of this RTI (with measurement-book | ||
| + | extract). | ||
| + | 6. Quality-test reports (third-party / lab / departmental) for | ||
| + | WBM / BT / concrete layers — copies. | ||
| + | 7. Penalty levied for delay, amount deducted (with proof of | ||
| + | deduction). | ||
| + | 8. Completion certificate (if issued), date and issuing officer. | ||
| + | 9. Inspection reports by Junior Engineer / Sub-Divisional | ||
| + | Engineer for the last 12 months. | ||
| + | 10. Any complaints received about this work and action taken. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am a citizen of India residing at [address near the road]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | [Name + address + signature + date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step-by-step ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Identify which agency owns the road: state highway → PWD; rural road → PMGSY; urban → Municipal; national highway → NHAI. | ||
| + | - Find the **Sub-Divisional Engineer / Executive Engineer** postal address. | ||
| + | - File via state RTI portal (PWD/ | ||
| + | - ₹10 fee. | ||
| + | - Diary 30-day deadline. | ||
| + | - First Appeal → Executive Engineer / Chief Engineer; Second Appeal → SIC (state) / CIC (NHAI). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common scenarios ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tender but no work started ==== | ||
| + | Ask for tender award date + work-order date + reason for non-commencement. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Half-completed indefinitely ==== | ||
| + | Ask for measurement book + balance work + revised completion schedule. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Quality concerns (cracks, potholes within months) ==== | ||
| + | Ask for third-party quality-test reports + PWD inspection reports + warranty/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Funds released but no work ==== | ||
| + | Ask for utilisation certificate + photo evidence + field-inspection report. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Contractor blacklisted in another state — still active here ==== | ||
| + | Ask for the contractor' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CIC, //Road Works v. PWD UP// (2017)** — PWD directed to disclose contractor + quality reports; " | ||
| + | * **//Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI// (2018)** — Works register suo motu under §4(1)(b)(xii). | ||
| + | * **//Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. PMO// (CIC 2014)** — High-value spending must be transparent. | ||
| + | * **State Information Commission (Maharashtra, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Vague road description — give exact location + landmark. | ||
| + | * Filing with municipal corp when it's a state PWD road (or vice versa) — wrong public authority. | ||
| + | * Skipping quality-test report ask. | ||
| + | * Asking for personal financial info of contractor (denied under §8(1)(j)). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Pro tips ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Visit the work site — note the **board** with sanction details (project no., contractor, amount, completion date). Quote in RTI. | ||
| + | * Take photos with date-time stamps as supporting evidence (attach to RTI). | ||
| + | * Cite **state PWD Works Manual + §4(1)(b)(xii)** explicitly. | ||
| + | * Ask for **field inspection reports + measurement book** — surfaces ghost works. | ||
| + | * Forward RTI reply to local journalists / RTI activists for amplification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Will the road actually get fixed after the RTI? ==== | ||
| + | Often yes — PIO discovery of file forces internal action (engineer transfer, contractor penalty, work resumption). Even if reply is partial, it gives you the **named contractor** + **sanction amount** to pursue further (CVC / vigilance / court). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I get the contractor' | ||
| + | **No** — §8(1)(j) personal info. But the contractor' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if the work is by a private builder (not public)? ==== | ||
| + | RTI doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Toll road — same procedure? ==== | ||
| + | For NHAI tolled stretches, file at NHAI via rtionline.gov.in. See [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Multi-agency road (state + central + local)? ==== | ||
| + | File parallel RTIs to each. Each agency' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Half-finished, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **File the RTI.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - RTI Act 2005 — §6(1), §7(1), §8(1)(d), §8(1)(j), §8(2), §19, §20. | ||
| + | - State PWD Works Manuals + CPWD Works Manual. | ||
| + | - National Highways Authority of India Act 1988. | ||
| + | - PMGSY Operational Manual. | ||
| + | - //Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI// (2018); //Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. PMO// (CIC 2014). | ||
| + | - CIC //Road Works v. PWD UP// (2017). | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||