Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-patent-application-status [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Patent application stuck? File one RTI to IPO ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** Patent application stuck? File one RTI to IPO — RTI to IPO Delhi. 22 days later reply: Controller allocated; FER expected within 90 days. FER received; | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Short version.** **Patent application** at **Indian Patent Office (CGPDTM)** typical timeline: filing → publication 18 months → request for examination → FER → grant — total often 3-7 years. If stuck without movement post-RFE filing, RTI to **PIO of IPO Regional Office** with **₹10 fee** legally forces a written reply within **30 days** under §7(1) RTI Act 2005. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **Patent application stuck? File one RTI to IPO — RTI to IPO Delhi. 22 days later reply: Controller allocated; FER expected within 90 days. FER received; | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Real story ===== | ||
| + | Dr. Mehta filed a patent in 2020. RFE filed 2022. //" | ||
| + | |||
| + | RTI to IPO Delhi. **22 days later** reply: Controller allocated; FER expected within 90 days. FER received; pre-grant opposition filed by competitor; hearing scheduled. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statute ===== | ||
| + | - **Patents Act 1970** (amended 2005) + **Rules 2003**. | ||
| + | - **CGPDTM Service Quality Charter** — RFE → FER timeline. | ||
| + | - §6(1) + §7(1) RTI Act. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Copy-ready RTI ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, PIO, IPO Regional Office, [Address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: §6(1) RTI Act — patent application status | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | RFE date : DD-MM-YYYY | ||
| + | Title (brief) : [Invention] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please provide: | ||
| + | 1. Current status + stage (filed/ | ||
| + | 2. Controller name + allocation date. | ||
| + | 3. Reason for delay beyond Service Quality Charter SLA. | ||
| + | 4. Pre-grant / post-grant opposition status. | ||
| + | 5. Expected next step + timeline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citizen. Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed. | ||
| + | [Name + signature + address + date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common scenarios ===== | ||
| + | - Examination not allocated. | ||
| + | - FER reply pending response. | ||
| + | - Pre-grant opposition under §25(1). | ||
| + | - Post-grant opposition under §25(2). | ||
| + | - Annual fee dispute. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law ===== | ||
| + | - **// | ||
| + | - CIC //CGPDTM Patent// (2018) — disclosure of examination pendency. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
| + | ==== Expedited examination? | ||
| + | Available for startups, women applicants, govt institutions, | ||
| + | ==== Patent term? ==== | ||
| + | 20 years from filing; annuities mandatory. | ||
| + | ==== Pre-grant vs post-grant opposition? ==== | ||
| + | Pre = before grant; post = within 12 months of grant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
| + | Patent backlog can kill commercial viability. RTI accelerates. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | - Patents Act 1970/2005; Rules 2003. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 🔗 Related guides ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||