Ramesh, an MBBS first-year student in Patna, applied for the Post-Matric Scholarship for SC through scholarships.gov.in in October. Status went “Verified by Institute → Forwarded to Ministry → Approved”. Eight months later: no DBT credit. The college office said “upar se aayega”. Ministry helpdesk was unreachable.

He filed an RTI to the PIO at the Department of Social Justice & Empowerment. Twenty-three days later the reply: his scholarship had been on hold because of an Aadhaar–bank-account-name mismatch that NSP's pre-disbursement check had flagged. He fixed the seeding in two days; the credit hit his account that week.

NSP scholarships are administered through multiple central ministries (Social Justice / Tribal Affairs / Minority Affairs / Education), each with its own PIO, with last-mile execution via State / District welfare offices + DBT through PFMS.

1. Enters a register — 30-day clock under §7(1).
2. Specific officer becomes liable under §20(1).
3. File becomes traceable — the exact bottleneck (Aadhaar mismatch, institute non-attestation, district verification pending, fund clearance) surfaces.

Most stuck-scholarship RTIs get a substantive reply (and frequently the credit) within 20-25 days.

• §6(1) RTI Act — citizen's right to request.
• §7(1) RTI Act — 30-day disposal.
• §7(5) — fee waiver for BPL applicants (most NSP applicants qualify).
• §4(1)(b)(xii) — beneficiary lists are suo motu disclosable.
• NSP Operational Guidelines (latest 2024) — specifies the institute → district → state → ministry workflow + DBT timeline (target: 60 days from application to credit).

To,
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
[Department of Social Justice & Empowerment / Tribal Affairs /
 Minority Affairs / Department of School Education & Literacy / etc.]
[Or — District Welfare Officer / DBT Cell, your District HQ]

Subject: §6(1) RTI Act 2005 — status of my NSP scholarship application

Sir/Madam,

   Applicant name : [Your name]
   NSP App. ID    : [from scholarships.gov.in]
   Scholarship    : [Pre-Matric / Post-Matric / Merit-cum-Means / Top Class]
   Category       : [SC/ST/OBC/Minority/General-EBC]
   Institute      : [Name + DISE/AISHE code]
   Application date: DD-MM-YYYY

Please provide:

   1. Current status and exact stage of my NSP application.
   2. Name and designation of the dealing officer holding my file.
   3. Date(s) of movement: Institute verified → District forwarded →
      State forwarded → Ministry approved → DBT initiated.
   4. Reason for delay beyond the 60-day NSP Operational Guideline
      timeline.
   5. Expected DBT credit date and the bank account being used.
   6. Copy of any noting / objection / Aadhaar-mismatch flag on
      my file.
   7. If rejected, the rejection order with reasons.

I am a citizen of India [/and a BPL applicant; fee waiver under §7(5)
RTI Act sought, BPL card photocopy enclosed].

Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed [or waived under §7(5) BPL].

Yours faithfully,
[Name + address + signature + date]

1. Log in to scholarships.gov.in with NSP App. ID, note status.
2. Identify the issuing ministry (NSP shows it). Find PIO via that ministry's “RTI” page.
3. Use rtionline.gov.in → relevant ministry (NSP scholarships are Central — Central RTI portal works).
4. Pay ₹10 (or §7(5) BPL waiver).
5. Diary 30-day deadline.
6. First Appeal under §19(1) within 30 days of deemed refusal.
7. Second Appeal to CIC within 90 days (NSP is Central).

Ask for the PFMS (Public Financial Management System) sanction date, the DBT batch ID, and bank-account confirmation.

Ask for the technical reason flagged + procedure for re-seeding.

Ask the District Welfare Officer to provide the institute's pendency list and date of follow-up to the institute.

Ask: “Provide the renewal-application date, my last-year credit, and reason for non-renewal beyond NSP renewal timeline.”

• Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC, (2013) 1 SCC 212 — Other applicants' details §8(1)(j); your own not.
• CIC, SC/ST Welfare v. MoSJE (2018) — Ministry directed to disclose district-wise pendency; held that “DBT system delay” is not a §8 ground.
• CIC, Tribal Scholarship v. MoTA (2020) — PIO fined ₹10,000 for failing to disclose dealing officer's name.
• Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI (2018) — §4(1)(b)(xii) suo motu disclosure of beneficiary lists is mandatory.

• Filing without NSP App. ID.
• Asking other students' bank details.
• Not using rtionline.gov.in (Central scholarships are Central — works there).
• Skipping §7(5) BPL waiver.

• Always include NSP App. ID + AISHE/DISE institute code.
• For renewal cases, mention prior year credit date for trace.
• Ask DWO + Ministry in parallel if stuck > 6 months — both have files.
• Cite NSP Operational Guidelines 60-day timeline explicitly.

20-25 days from filing. Many applicants report the credit landing during the RTI window because the ministry resolves the actual issue (Aadhaar mismatch, institute non-attestation) just to write a reply.

File the RTI with the District Welfare Officer. They have the receipt log. Sub-clause: “Provide the date my application was received from the institute, and any communication sent back to the institute for clarification.”

RTI is for Indian citizens only. NSP itself only allows Indian citizens, so this should not arise.

Only BPL gets statutory waiver under §7(5). SC/ST who are above poverty line still pay ₹10. Most state portals also waive for BPL only.

A stuck NSP scholarship is highly fixable through RTI. The 60-day NSP timeline + 30-day RTI clock + DBT traceability give you multiple levers. Cost: ₹10 (waived for BPL).

File the RTI.

• First Appeal — step-by-step
• 🎤 AwaazRTI

1. RTI Act 2005 — §6(1), §7(1), §7(5), §8(1)(j), §19, §20.
2. NSP Operational Guidelines (2024).
3. Girish Ramchandra Deshpande v. CIC, (2013) 1 SCC 212.
4. CIC SC/ST Welfare (2018), Tribal Scholarship (2020).
5. scholarships.gov.in + pfms.nic.in.

Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.