Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-for-slum-rehabilitation [2026/08/02 02:28] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | ====== Slum Rehabilitation Dispute? RTI to the SRA or Housing Board ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** Slum eviction or rehab tenement disputed? File RTI to SRA, DUSIB or TNUHDB for eligibility roster, cut-off notice, allotment and transit-rent record. Rs.10 guide. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The story most citizens recognise ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sunita and her husband Rajesh have lived in a single-room hutment in a Mumbai island-city slum since 1998. Their name is on the electoral roll of the ward, the ration card lists the hut address, and a faded electricity bill from 2003 is still taped to the wall. In early 2026 a notice is pasted on the hut: the cluster has been declared a Slum Rehabilitation Area, a developer has been appointed, and residents are told to move into transit camps within thirty days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When the eligibility roster is finally pinned outside the SRA division office, Sunita' | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is not one family' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What slum rehabilitation actually is ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Slum rehabilitation in India is not a single central scheme. It is a patchwork of **state statutes**, run by **state-level authorities**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Maharashtra** governs slums through the **Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Maharashtra cut-off dates are decisive. A structure existing on or before **1 January 2000** qualifies its occupier as a **" | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Delhi** works under the **Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010**, which establishes DUSIB. **Section 10** of that Act deals with removal and resettlement of jhuggi jhopri (JJ) bastis — it requires a scheme to be prepared, the land-owner and the resettlee to share cost, and prior Central Government consent where the basti sits on Central land. The operative policy is the **Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015**, approved at DUSIB' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Delhi' | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Tamil Nadu** governs slums through the **Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971** (TN Act 11 of 1971). The old Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board was renamed the **Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUHDB)** vide G.O.(Ms).No.103 of the Housing and Urban Development Department dated 1 September 2021, and the substitution was formalised by the **Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Amendment Act, 2022** (Act 20 of 2022), which replaced " | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the central level, **PMAY-Urban 2.0** is the live mission. The Union Cabinet approved it on **9 August 2024** for a five-year run from **1 September 2024 to 2029**, targeting **1 crore urban families** with a total investment of **Rs.10 lakh crore** and central assistance of **Rs.2.30 lakh crore**. Its verticals include Beneficiary-Led Construction (BLC), Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP) including **in-situ slum redevelopment**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP tip> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== How the rehabilitation flow works ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understanding the flow tells you which record to demand at which stage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Survey and declaration.** The state authority conducts a door-to-door (and increasingly biometric/ | ||
| + | - **Eligibility classification.** Each household is classified as protected occupier, paid-rehabilitation occupier, or ineligible, based on the cut-off date and the survey evidence. The result is the **eligibility roster** — a list that should, by law, be displayed publicly. | ||
| + | - **Developer appointment.** In Maharashtra-style SRA projects, a developer is appointed through an Invitation of Application (IOA) and a Letter of Intent (LOI). The developer signs a development agreement with the cooperative society of slum dwellers, which sets the project timeline and the rehab-building specifications. | ||
| + | - **Transit and rehabilitation.** Eligible families move to transit camps (or receive monthly transit rent) while the rehab buildings are constructed. On completion, permanent allotment letters are issued and the rehab cooperative society takes possession. | ||
| + | - **Allotment and lock-in.** The allotment letter records the tenement number, carpet area, floor and building. A **ten-year lock-in** under Section 3E in Maharashtra, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each of these stages generates a paper record, and every one of those records is obtainable under the RTI Act. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The 2026 update you must know about ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two things changed in 2025-2026 that directly affect what you should ask for. | ||
| + | |||
| + | First, **transit rent in Mumbai has been zoned and codified**. The SRA now pays a zoned monthly transit rent — **Rs.12,000 a month** in Mumbai up to Bandra, **Rs.10,000 a month** from Bandra to Andheri and Ghatkopar, and **Rs.8,000 a month** in the extended suburbs and the rest of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. The older figure of Rs.20,000 a month that some residents and even some lawyers still quote is **not an official figure**; the verified zoned amounts are what the SRA is bound to disburse. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Second, **SRA Circular No. 231 dated 19 December 2025, read with an Office Order dated 8 January 2026**, allows the SRA to **freeze the sale component of a developer' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Third, a **Maharashtra legislative amendment in July 2025** changed the Slum Areas Act in three ways. Unpaid transit rent is now treated as **arrears of land revenue**, recoverable under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; personal liability is fastened on directors or partners if the company' | ||
| + | |||
| + | For Delhi, the live framework remains the **2015 Policy** as amended in 2016 and 2017, with the cut-offs of 1 January 2006 (basti-level) and 1 January 2015 (jhuggi-level). There is no separately notified Delhi transit-rent figure — if a DUSIB file refers to one, treat it as unverified and ask for the exact notification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step-by-step: | ||
| + | |||
| + | You will usually file **one application** to the **state authority** that holds your file — the SRA division office, DUSIB, or TNUHDB — because slum rehabilitation is a state subject. A second, narrower application to MoHUA is useful only where PMAY-U 2.0 in-situ slum redevelopment funds are involved. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Step 1 — Identify the public authority.** | ||
| + | - **Maharashtra: | ||
| + | - **Delhi:** The Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) is the custodian. For Central-land clusters, the Central Government land-owning agency (CPWD, Railways, DDA) also holds relevant consent records. | ||
| + | - **Tamil Nadu:** The Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUHDB). | ||
| + | - **Central (only for PMAY-U 2.0 convergence): | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Step 2 — Prepare your questions.** Ask for specific, dated records, not vague " | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Survey sheet:** " | ||
| + | - **Cut-off notification: | ||
| + | - **Eligibility roster:** " | ||
| + | - **Allotment log:** " | ||
| + | - **Developer agreement and timeline:** " | ||
| + | - **Transit rent:** " | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Step 3 — Use the right form and fee.** Under **Section 6(1)** of the RTI Act, 2005, the application goes to the Public Information Officer of the chosen authority. The fee is **Rs.10** for most states and for Central authorities, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Step 4 — Submit and keep proof.** File by hand and take a stamped receiving copy, or send by registered post and keep the acknowledgement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Step 5 — Wait 30 days.** The PIO must reply within **30 days** under **Section 7(1)** of the RTI Act (48 hours where life or liberty is at stake — relevant if a demolition is imminent). If no reply arrives, file a **First Appeal under Section 19(1)** within 30 days to the First Appellate Authority in the same department. If the FAA also fails, file a **Second Appeal under Section 19(3)** to the State Information Commission (or the Central Information Commission for MoHUA) within 90 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the actual drafting, you can use the free **AI RTI Draft App** at https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Documents to attach ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - A photocopy of your ration card, voter ID, or Aadhaar showing the hut address. | ||
| + | - Any pre-cut-off documentary proof — an old electricity bill, a voter-list extract, a property tax receipt, a school leaving certificate of a child listing the hut address. | ||
| + | - A photograph of the hut with a visible date stamp or a contemporaneous newspaper. | ||
| + | - The eviction or redevelopment notice, if served. | ||
| + | - Any earlier survey slip or photo-pass issued to the household. | ||
| + | - The BPL card, if you are claiming the fee waiver. | ||
| + | - The Indian Postal Order or receipt for the Rs.10 fee. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Asking for the named allotment list.** A named list of co-allottees is personal information and is routinely refused under **Section 8(1)(j)** of the RTI Act. Ask instead for an **anonymised roster with household serial numbers** — aggregate eligibility rosters under a welfare scheme are mandatorily disclosable under **Section 4(1)(b)(xii)**, | ||
| + | - **Filing to the municipality when the SRA is the custodian.** The BMC or MCD holds the slum register; the SRA or DUSIB holds the rehabilitation file. Filing at the wrong desk gets you a "no information" | ||
| + | - **Ignoring the cut-off-date notification.** Every eligibility decision pivots on the cut-off date. If you do not ask for the notification and its approving officer, you cannot challenge a wrong classification. | ||
| + | - **Forgetting transit-rent records.** Transit-rent ledgers are the cleanest evidence of developer default. After the July 2025 Maharashtra amendment, unpaid transit rent is recoverable as land-revenue arrears — the ledger is now a legally loaded document. | ||
| + | - **Missing the 60-day objection window.** In Maharashtra, | ||
| + | - **Using the old name "Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board." | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Real-life example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box> | ||
| + | Sunita B., a domestic worker, lives with her husband Rajesh and two school-going children in a hutment in an island-city Mumbai slum that was first surveyed in 1999. In February 2026 the cluster is declared a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, and a developer is appointed vide LOI dated 6 March 2026. The eligibility roster displayed outside the SRA division office omits Sunita' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sunita files an RTI to the PIO, SRA Mumbai City Division, on 14 April 2026, asking for: (1) a certified copy of the 1999 door-to-door survey sheet covering her hut number, (2) the 1 January 2000 cut-off notification applicable to her cluster and the approving officer' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The SRA replies on 13 May 2026, day 29. The survey sheet shows her hut listed in 1999; the roster records her household as " | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample RTI letter ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer, | ||
| + | Slum Rehabilitation Authority / Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board / | ||
| + | Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, | ||
| + | [Division / City Office, Address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, | ||
| + | regarding slum rehabilitation records for my household. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | I, [Name], son/ | ||
| + | [Hut Number, Slum/Basti Name, Ward, City], hereby submit the following | ||
| + | application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Particulars of the slum and household: | ||
| + | Slum / Basti name: ____________________ | ||
| + | Scheme / Project reference: ____________________ | ||
| + | Cut-off date claimed: ____________________ | ||
| + | Developer name (if redevelopment): | ||
| + | Household survey ID / serial number (if known): ____________________ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Information sought: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. A certified copy of the door-to-door / biometric survey sheet covering | ||
| + | my hut number, including the photograph and the Aadhaar verification entry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. The cut-off-date notification applicable to my slum, the date of its | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. The anonymised eligibility roster for my slum, with household serial | ||
| + | | ||
| + | my household serial number. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. The tenement-allotment log entry for my household — tenement number, | ||
| + | | ||
| + | after the original survey. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. The development agreement, Invitation of Application, | ||
| + | and project timeline for the rehabilitation project at my slum. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. My household' | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 7. The Rehabilitation and Resettlement entitlement document applicable | ||
| + | to my household. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 8. Action-taken on grievance reference ____________________ raised by me. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 9. If my eligibility was denied, the written ground of denial and the | ||
| + | name and designation of the officer who recorded it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 10. The name, designation and address of the First Appellate Authority | ||
| + | for this office. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I enclose Indian Postal Order No. ____________________ for Rs.10 towards | ||
| + | the application fee. I declare that I am a citizen of India. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Signature] | ||
| + | [Name] | ||
| + | [Date, Place] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q1. Can the SRA refuse to give me the survey sheet by calling it personal information? | ||
| + | No. The methodology, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q2. What is the correct transit rent in Mumbai? ==== | ||
| + | The verified zoned SRA transit rent is Rs.12,000 a month in Mumbai up to Bandra, Rs.10,000 a month from Bandra to Andheri and Ghatkopar, and Rs.8,000 a month in the extended suburbs and the rest of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. The figure of Rs.20,000 a month that is sometimes quoted is not an official SRA figure. Ask for the zoned-rate notification and your disbursement ledger in your RTI. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q3. Can I get the named list of all allottees in my slum? ==== | ||
| + | A named allotment list with contact and identity details of other allottees is generally refused under Section 8(1)(j). The correct ask is an **anonymised eligibility roster** with household serial numbers — this is disclosable, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q4. Is there a fixed time limit for handover of the rehabilitation tenement? ==== | ||
| + | There is no universal central norm. State policies set their own timelines — the Delhi Slum and JJ Policy, 2015 targets rehabilitation of all eligible JJ bastis within five years. Ask the PIO for the project timeline appended to the developer' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q5. The developer has stopped work midway. What should I ask for? ==== | ||
| + | Ask for the show-cause notice issued to the developer, any re-tender records, the bank guarantee or performance security held by the authority, the latest progress report submitted by the developer, and the action-taken on complaints from the cooperative society. After the December 2025 SRA Circular No. 231, also ask whether the sale flats have been frozen at the IOA stage and the status of transit-rent recovery as land-revenue arrears. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q6. My hut was built in 2002. Am I entitled to rehabilitation? | ||
| + | In Maharashtra, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q7. Can I challenge an eligibility denial through RTI alone? ==== | ||
| + | RTI surfaces the record; it does not by itself change the decision. The challenge is filed before the Grievance Redressal Committee under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act (or the equivalent state forum), and thereafter before the High Court or the National Human Rights Commission where a fundamental right to shelter is infringed. But the RTI-extracted paper — the survey sheet, the cut-off notification, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q8. Do the courts recognise a right to shelter? ==== | ||
| + | Yes. In **Chameli Singh v. State of U.P.**, (1996) 2 SCC 549, the Supreme Court held that the right to shelter is a fundamental right under Article 21, with an affirmative duty on the State to provide shelter to weaker sections. In **Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q9. Should I file a parallel complaint while the RTI is pending? ==== | ||
| + | If your family is vulnerable or a demolition is imminent, yes. File a complaint with the **National Human Rights Commission** or your State Commission for Protection of Child Rights, and send a written representation to the District Collector and the municipal ward office. The RTI gives you the record; the parallel complaint gives you the protective paper trail while the record is being extracted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q10. Can I file this RTI online? ==== | ||
| + | For Central authorities such as MoHUA, yes, through the Central RTI portal rtionline.gov.in. For state authorities, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, | ||
| + | - SRA Pune — The Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 (full PDF): [srapune.gov.in](https:// | ||
| + | - Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010: [indiankanoon.org](https:// | ||
| + | - Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 (Part A, amended): [delhishelterboard.in](https:// | ||
| + | - Delhi Slum and JJ Relocation Policy 2015 (Part 2): [delhishelterboard.in](http:// | ||
| + | - Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 (TN Act 11 of 1971): [indiacode.nic.in](https:// | ||
| + | - PIB — Cabinet approves PMAY-Urban 2.0 (9 August 2024; 1 crore families, Rs.10 lakh crore investment, Rs.2.30 lakh crore central assistance): | ||
| + | - PMAY-U 2.0 Operational Guidelines (PDF): [pmay-urban.gov.in](https:// | ||
| + | - Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs: [mohua.gov.in](https:// | ||
| + | - Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, | ||
| + | - Chameli Singh v. State of U.P., (1996) 2 SCC 549: [indiankanoon.org](https:// | ||
| + | - Sudama Singh v. Government of Delhi, WP(C) No. 8904 of 2009 (Delhi HC, 11 February 2010): [indiankanoon.org](https:// | ||
| + | - Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia, Civil Appeal Nos. 21806-21807 of 2017 (SC, 12 December 2017): [api.sci.gov.in](https:// | ||
| + | - CIC order dated 16 March 2010 (Entry 58, IC Shailesh Gandhi) — suo motu disclosure of slum cluster survey and allotment lists under Section 4(1)(b): [delta.org.in](https:// | ||
| + | - SRA Circular No. 231 dated 19 December 2025 and Office Order dated 8 January 2026 — freezing of developer sale flats to secure transit rent: [squarefeatindia.com](https:// | ||
| + | - Maharashtra legislative amendment, July 2025 — transit rent as arrears of land revenue: [theprint.in](https:// | ||
| + | - Central RTI online portal: [rtionline.gov.in](https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[rti-for-property-mutation-delay|RTI for property mutation delay]] | ||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[/ | ||
| + | - [[rti-property-records-before-buying|RTI property records before buying]] | ||
| + | - [[society-noc-flat-sale-denied-resident-action-plan|Society NOC denied — resident action plan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 5 July 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||