Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-for-grant-in-aid-disbursement [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | ====== RTI to Trace Grant-in-Aid Disbursement ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** File RTI to the sanctioning authority to trace grant-in-aid money: sanction order, PFMS tracking, utilisation certificate and recovery. Templates inside. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | A village youth club gets a government grant of Rs.2 lakh to build a community library. The sanction letter arrives. The club is happy. Months pass. The library is half-built. The money, the club is told, was " | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the grant-in-aid trail problem. Money leaves the government treasury, passes through one or more offices, and reaches an end beneficiary — a society, a trust, an NGO, a school, a panchayat, a cooperative. Somewhere in that chain the record goes thin. The good news: every link in that chain is public money, and under the Right to Information Act 2005 you have a legal right to follow it end to end. This page shows you exactly how, step by step, with the rules, the forms, the fee, the template, and the escalation ladder. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What is grant-in-aid, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grant-in-aid is public money given by the government to an outside body so that body can do a public job — run a school, run a shelter, hold a training programme, maintain a welfare centre. The money is not a loan. It does not have to be repaid, but it **must be spent for the purpose it was given**, and it **must be accounted for**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The rules that govern this are in the **General Financial Rules 2017 (GFR 2017)**, Chapter 9 — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Rule 228** — says **who may receive a grant**: autonomous bodies, registered societies, trusts, NGOs, educational institutions, | ||
| + | * **Rule 230** — the **principles and procedure** for giving a grant. It has 17 sub-rules. Two are very useful for RTI: Rule 230(7) says any **unspent balance from a previous grant must be adjusted** in the next sanction; Rule 230(16) says the sanction letter **must state that an un-utilised amount has to be refunded with interest**. | ||
| + | * **Rule 231** — grants to **voluntary organisations** (the rule for most NGO grants). | ||
| + | * **Rule 234** — the authority must keep a **Register of Grants**. | ||
| + | * **Rule 236** — the grantee' | ||
| + | * **Rule 238** — the grantee must file a **Utilisation Certificate in Form GFR 12-A**, within **12 months** of the close of the financial year. Failure can lead to being blacklisted from future grants. | ||
| + | |||
| + | So when you trace a grant, these rules tell you which records **must exist**. If a record does not exist, that itself is a disclosure-worthy fact. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why grant disbursement is disclosable — the legal hook ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grant-in-aid is spent public money. There is **no exemption in Section 8 of the RTI Act** that protects it. On the contrary, the Act makes this kind of information a **duty to publish proactively**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Section 4(1)(b)(xii)** of the RTI Act 2005 requires every public authority to suo motu (on its own) disclose **"the manner of execution of subsidy programmes, including the amounts allocated and the details of beneficiaries" | ||
| + | * **DoPT Office Memorandum No. 1/6/2011-IR dated 15 April 2013** directs that all discretionary and non-discretionary grants and allocations to states, NGOs and other institutions — **plus the annual accounts of legal entities receiving grants** — must be placed on the public authority' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In plain words: the government is already supposed to publish who got the grant and how much. When it has not, an RTI application is the tool to make it come out. See [[section-4-proactive-disclosure|Section 4 proactive disclosure]] for the broader duty. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The five records to ask for ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Trace the money by asking for these five records, in this order. Each one answers "what happened to the money" at a different stage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Sanction order** — the letter that approved the grant. It carries the sanction number, the amount, the purpose, the grantee, and the conditions (including the refund-with-interest clause under Rule 230(16)). Without the sanction number you cannot trace anything. | ||
| + | - **Disbursement schedule** — when and in how many instalments the money was to be released. This shows whether the full amount was ever sent. | ||
| + | - **PFMS tracking ID** — the payment reference inside the **Public Finance Management System (PFMS)**. PFMS is run by the **Office of the Controller General of Accounts (CGA), Ministry of Finance**. With the ID you can watch the payment move. | ||
| + | - **Utilisation Certificate (UC) linkage** — the Form GFR 12-A filed by the grantee under Rule 238. This is the proof that the money was actually spent for the purpose. See [[rti-for-utilization-certificate|RTI for Utilisation Certificate]] for a deep guide. | ||
| + | - **Recovery records** — if any amount was to be recovered (unspent balance, refund with interest, penalty), the order and the recovery receipt. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step 1 — Find the sanction number ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Before you file, gather what you already have: the name of the scheme, the name of the grantee, the year, and ideally the sanction order number. The sanction number is the key that unlocks every other record. If you do not have it, your first RTI can simply ask for it: " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step 2 — Identify the Sanctioning Authority ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The RTI application must go to the **Public Information Officer (PIO) of the Sanctioning Authority** — the office that issued the sanction. This is usually a department, a directorate, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step 3 — Track the payment on PFMS yourself ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | You do not have to wait for the RTI reply to start tracking. PFMS offers **public tools** at **pfms.nic.in**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Know Your Payments** — search by bank and account number (plus a captcha). | ||
| + | * **Track NSP Payments**, **DBT Status Tracker**, **Know MGNREGA FTO Status**, and **Know External System FTO** — for specific scheme streams. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The PFMS helpdesk is **[email protected]** and **011-23343860**. Note down whatever you find and attach it to your RTI application — it shows the PIO you have done your homework and pins the payment to a reference. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step 4 — File the RTI application ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here is a ready template. Fill in the bracketed parts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To: The Public Information Officer, | ||
| + | [Sanctioning Authority name and address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: Application under Section 6 of the RTI Act 2005 — | ||
| + | Grant-in-aid disbursement and utilisation | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grant Sanction No. [sanction number] dated [date], | ||
| + | for [purpose], granted to [grantee name]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please furnish certified copies of: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. The sanction order, including all conditions. | ||
| + | 2. The disbursement schedule and instalment-wise release dates. | ||
| + | 3. The PFMS payment reference / tracking ID for each instalment. | ||
| + | 4. The Utilisation Certificate in Form GFR 12-A filed | ||
| + | under Rule 238 of GFR 2017, for this grant. | ||
| + | 5. Any order and receipt for recovery of unspent or | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | The information relates to the execution of a subsidy / | ||
| + | grant programme and to the discharge of the suo motu | ||
| + | disclosure duty under Section 4(1)(b)(xii) of the RTI Act | ||
| + | and DoPT OM No. 1/6/2011-IR dated 15.04.2013. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fee: Rs.10 by [Indian Postal Order / court-fee stamp / cash]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Date: [date] | ||
| + | Signature: [yours] | ||
| + | Address: [yours] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The **central public-authority application fee is Rs.10**. State fees vary — some states charge less, some nothing. Pay by Indian Postal Order (IPO) in favour of the authority, or by court-fee stamp, or in cash against a receipt where allowed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step 5 — If the reply is silent or refused ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The PIO must reply within **30 days** (48 hours where life or liberty is involved). If you get no reply, or a refusal, or a partial reply, you have a clear ladder to climb: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **First Appeal** — file within **30 days** of the expiry of the reply period with the **First Appellate Authority (FAA)** of the same public authority. The FAA must decide within 30 days (extendable to 45). | ||
| + | - **Second Appeal** — if the FAA also fails, file within **90 days** before the **Central Information Commission** (for central authorities) or the **State Information Commission** (for state authorities). | ||
| + | - **RTI for proof** — at any stage, you can file a fresh RTI asking for the **Register of Grants entry** under GFR Rule 234, the **audit observations** under Rule 236, or the **website-disclosure status** under the DoPT OM. These often surface facts the first reply skipped. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The same chain works if the money simply vanished: the Register of Grants and the audit report are the paper trail that shows whether the sanctioning authority itself did its job. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Filing without the sanction order number.** Without it the PIO cannot locate the file, and you get a generic "not available" | ||
| + | * **Filing with the wrong office.** The beneficiary office is rarely the sanctioning office. Trace the sanction first. | ||
| + | * **Skipping the PFMS ID ask.** The sanction and the payment are separate records. A sanction order proves approval; only the PFMS ID proves the money moved. | ||
| + | * **Forgetting the UC.** A " | ||
| + | * **Assuming foreign-funded NGOs follow the same path.** The Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) governs **foreign** contributions to NGOs. It is a **separate regime** and is **not** the route for domestic grant-in-aid RTI. Domestic NGO grants flow under GFR 2017 Rule 231 and scheme guidelines, and are tracked via PFMS — not FCRA. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A note on proactive disclosure ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Much of what you are asking for should already be on the authority' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQ ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Q: The grant spans more than one year. What do I ask?** Ask for the **annual disbursement schedule** and the **instalment-wise PFMS IDs**, plus a UC for each financial year separately (Rule 238 ties the UC to the close of each financial year). | ||
| + | * **Q: The grant was cancelled midway. Can I find out why?** Yes. Ask for the **cancellation order**, the **reasons recorded**, and the **recovery order and receipt** for any amount ordered to be refunded. | ||
| + | * **Q: The grantee is an NGO and I suspect the money was diverted.** Ask for the UC in Form GFR 12-A, the **audit report under Rule 236**, and any **action taken on audit observations**. Diversion usually shows up as a mismatch between the UC and the audited accounts. | ||
| + | * **Q: Can I get the beneficiary list?** Yes. Section 4(1)(b)(xii) specifically covers " | ||
| + | * **Q: The PIO says the information is "third party" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **GFR 2017, Chapter 9 — Grants-in-Aid and Loans** (Rules 228, 230, 231, 234, 236, 238) — https:// | ||
| + | - **GFR 2017 updated to 31.07.2024** — https:// | ||
| + | - **Form GFR 12-A (Utilisation Certificate, | ||
| + | - **PFMS — Know Your Payments and public trackers (CGA, Ministry of Finance)** — https:// | ||
| + | - **PFMS overview (CGA)** — https:// | ||
| + | - **RTI Act 2005, Section 4 (suo motu disclosure incl. 4(1)(b)(xii))** — https:// | ||
| + | - **DoPT OM No. 1/6/2011-IR dated 15 April 2013** — https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 3 July 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | If this guide helped you follow public money, **[[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Step 1: What is grant-in-aid and how does disbursement work?** (a) Grant-in-aid is a financial grant given by government to: (i) NGOs and voluntary organizations, | ||
| + | - **Step 2: Comparison table — grant-in-aid types.** (a) Recurring grant: (i) purpose: operational expenses, (ii) frequency: annual, (iii) UC required: yes (GFR Form 68), (b) Non-recurring grant: (i) purpose: one-time project/ | ||
| + | - **Step 3: How to track grant-in-aid disbursement via RTI.** (a) All government departments disbursing grants are public authorities under RTI Act, (b) RTI application can ask: (i) " | ||
| + | - **Step 4: How to verify grant-in-aid utilization.** (a) Step 1: Obtain disbursement list via RTI, (b) Step 2: Obtain utilization certificates via RTI, (c) Step 3: Cross-verify with audit reports and CAG reports, (d) Step 4: Check for: (i) amount match, (ii) purpose compliance, (iii) timely UC submission, (iv) unspent balance return, (e) Step 5: If discrepancies: | ||
| + | - **Step 5: E-E-A-T signals.** (a) Sources: rtionline.gov.in, | ||
| + | - **Step 6: Practical tips.** (a) cite GFR 2017 rules in RTI, (b) ask for specific scheme and year, (c) request both disbursement and UC data, (d) cross-verify with CAG reports, (e) file complaint if misutilization found, (f) Example: An RTI activist obtained grant-in-aid data for an NGO scheme and found Rs 50 lakh disbursed without UCs; filed complaint; funds recovered and NGO blacklisted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||