no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | rti-for-bid-rejection-reason [2026/05/05 04:27] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(File RTI to **Procurement Authority** under **§4(1)(d)**. Ask bid rejection reasons, technical-evaluation note, comparison with successful bidder (anonymised), | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Bid rejected — RTI for written reasons ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP collapse> | ||
| + | ===== Legal framework ===== | ||
| + | * **GFR 2017** — fair-dealing duty. | ||
| + | * **CVC Manual** — rejection process. | ||
| + | * **Article 14** — equality + reasoned decision. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 5 questions to ask ===== | ||
| + | - Rejection reasons. | ||
| + | - Technical evaluation note. | ||
| + | - Anonymised comparable. | ||
| + | - Appeal framework. | ||
| + | - Officer-in-charge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Template ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | To: The Public Information Officer, Procurement Authority | ||
| + | Subject: Application under §6 RTI Act 2005 — Bid rejection reasons | ||
| + | |||
| + | My bid in tender [..] was rejected. Please furnish (1) reasons, (2) technical note, (3) comparable, (4) appeal framework, (5) officer-in-charge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fee: Rs.10 by IPO/cash. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | * Forgetting **§4(1)(d)** — for **reasoned order**. | ||
| + | * Skipping **technical-evaluation** ask. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law anchors ===== | ||
| + | * **CIC/ | ||
| + | * **Tata Cellular v. UoI (1994) 6 SCC 651** — judicial review of tender. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Pro tips ===== | ||
| + | * Pair with **CVC complaint**. | ||
| + | * Bidder coalition stronger. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== FAQ ===== | ||
| + | * **Q: Pre-qualification rejection — reason?** RTI for **PQ-evaluation note**. | ||
| + | * **Q: Bid Earnest Money refund delayed?** Separate RTI. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading ===== | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | - GFR 2017. CVC Manual. Tata Cellular (1994). RTI §4(1)(d). | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||