Right to Information Wiki
Answer-sheet inspection (post Aditya Bandopadhyay) — RTI

File RTI to the **examining authority** (board/university/UPSC/SSC) citing Aditya Bandopadhyay. Ask inspection of own answer script, marking scheme, evaluator c

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—rti-for-answer-sheet-evaluation [2026/05/05 04:27] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(answer sheet RTI, Aditya Bandopadhyay, answer script inspection, OMR RTI, evaluation RTI)
 +metatag-description=(File RTI to the **examining authority** (board/university/UPSC/SSC) citing Aditya Bandopadhyay. Ask inspection of own answer script, marking scheme, evaluator c)}}
 +
 +====== Answer-sheet inspection (post Aditya Bandopadhyay) — RTI ======
 +
 +{{:social:auto:rti-for-answer-sheet-evaluation.png?direct&1200 |Answer-sheet inspection (post Aditya Bandopadhyay) — RTI — RTI Wiki}}
 +
 +{{page>snippets:dpdp-banner}}
 +
 +<WRAP info>**Direct answer.** File RTI to the **examining authority** (board/university/UPSC/SSC) citing Aditya Bandopadhyay. Ask inspection of own answer script, marking scheme, evaluator comments.</WRAP>
 +
 +<WRAP collapse>
 +===== Legal framework =====
 +  * **Aditya Bandopadhyay v. CBSE (2011) 8 SCC 497** — answer scripts are "information".
 +  * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011)** — evaluator identity protected.
 +  * **State education Acts**.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +===== 5 questions to ask =====
 +  - Inspection of answer script.
 +  - Marking scheme for the subject.
 +  - Evaluator comments (anonymised).
 +  - Moderator adjustments.
 +  - Average marks for section/question.
 +
 +===== Template =====
 +<code>
 +To: The Public Information Officer, Examining Authority
 +Subject: Application under §6 RTI Act 2005 — Answer-sheet inspection
 +
 +My answer script for [exam] roll [..] is sought under Aditya Bandopadhyay. Please furnish (1) inspection date, (2) marking scheme, (3) evaluator comments, (4) moderator adjustments, (5) averages.
 +
 +Fee: Rs.10 by IPO/cash.
 +</code>
 +
 +===== Common mistakes =====
 +  * Forgetting to **cite Aditya Bandopadhyay** — PIOs routinely refuse without it.
 +  * Skipping **marking scheme** ask — the key benchmark.
 +
 +===== Case law anchors =====
 +  * **Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011)** — foundational.
 +  * **Praveen Hosur v. CBSE (Kar HC 2009)** — OMR disclosable.
 +
 +===== Pro tips =====
 +  * Ask for **photocopy** not just inspection.
 +  * Pair with **board grievance redressal**.
 +
 +===== FAQ =====
 +  * **Q: JEE/NEET OMR — disclosable?** Yes — per Praveen Hosur.
 +  * **Q: Viva-voce marks — disclosable?** Bihar PSC v. Rizwi — balanced; institutional records yes, evaluator identity no.
 +
 +===== Related reading =====
 +  * [[:rti-for-university-result-rechecking|Rechecking RTI]]
 +  * [[:file-rti-online-india|How to file an RTI]]
 +
 +===== Sources =====
 +  - Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011). ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011). Praveen Hosur (2009).
 +
 +//Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>rti for answer sheet evaluation citizen-rti rti-template}}