📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—real-vs-fake-police-notice-india [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Real Police Notice vs Fake Police Notice — Citizen Guide 2026 ======
 +
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-description=(Real police notice vs fake police notice India: how to tell them apart in 90 seconds — BNSS §35, §91, §94, §179; dispatch number, letterhead, mode of service. Citizen guide 2026.)}}
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(real vs fake police notice India, fake police notice pdf, BNSS section 35, BNSS section 91, BNSS section 94, BNSS section 175, BNSS section 179, digital arrest scam, fake CBI notice, fake Mumbai Police notice, police summons format India, section 91 CrPC notice, section 160 CrPC, police notice dispatch number, fake cyber cell notice, real police summons verification, police notice mode of service, BNSS 2023)}}
 +
 +On 9 February 2026, a 71-year-old retired bank manager in Lucknow received a 6-page PDF on WhatsApp showing a **Mumbai Police** logo, an "**FIR No. 0078/2026**", a **₹4.8 crore money-laundering** allegation, and a 2-hour "digital arrest" deadline. The PDF carried a real-looking dispatch number, a real-looking signature, and a real-looking QR code. By the end of the day, ₹68 lakh had moved to a "RBI verification escrow". This is the template the **digital-arrest** scam has used to steal ₹2,140 crore from Indian citizens in 2025 alone (I4C / MHA Annual Report 2025-26 data). The good news: a real police notice in India looks //nothing// like that PDF, and the differences are visible to a citizen in under 90 seconds — if you know what to look at. This guide is the full **BNSS 2023** check-list for telling a real notice from a fake.
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Quick answer (90 seconds)** — A real police notice in India is a **printed paper** under **BNSS §35** (arrest), **§91** (production of person), **§94** (production of document), **§175(3)** (magistrate-directed investigation), or **§179** (witness attendance), bearing a dispatch number, FIR number, the issuing officer's name + rank + service ID, and **delivered to your address** by a uniformed officer or by post. A "PDF on WhatsApp" with a "digital arrest" demand is **always fake** — Indian police never serve notices on WhatsApp.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +===== In this guide =====
 +
 +  * [[#What a real police notice looks like|What a real police notice looks like]]
 +  * [[#What a fake police notice looks like|What a fake police notice looks like]]
 +  * [[#Side-by-side comparison|Side-by-side comparison]]
 +  * [[#The four real BNSS notices a citizen may receive|The four real BNSS notices a citizen may receive]]
 +  * [[#Where the confusion happens|Where the confusion happens]]
 +  * [[#Eight red flags to spot a fake police PDF|Eight red flags to spot a fake police PDF]]
 +  * [[#Step-by-step verification drill|Step-by-step verification drill]]
 +  * [[#Real-life example — Lucknow ₹68 lakh digital-arrest case|Real-life example — Lucknow ₹68 lakh digital-arrest case]]
 +  * [[#Sample reply to a real BNSS §35(3) notice|Sample reply to a real BNSS §35(3) notice]]
 +  * [[#Case-law touchpoints|Case-law touchpoints]]
 +  * [[#FAQ|FAQ]]
 +  * [[#Myth vs reality|Myth vs reality]]
 +  * [[#Last word|Last word]]
 +
 +===== What a real police notice looks like =====
 +
 +A real police notice in India in 2026 is a **paper document** printed on the letterhead of the issuing police station or unit. It carries (a) the police-station seal + crest, (b) a **dispatch number** in the format e.g. //DD-MM-YYYY/PS-NAME/Outward-No//, (c) the **FIR number** or **General Diary (GD) number** under which the proceeding originates, (d) the **issuing officer's name, rank, and IPC/IUC service number**, and (e) a clear citation of the **BNSS 2023 section** under which it is issued.
 +
 +A real notice is **delivered to your registered address** through one of these channels:
 +
 +  * **Hand delivery** by a uniformed police constable / head constable carrying an ID and a duplicate acknowledgement slip you sign.
 +  * **Registered post / Speed Post with AD** (acknowledgement due) — the addressed envelope and tracking number are part of the record.
 +  * **Through your employer or panchayat secretary** (for service in remote/rural areas).
 +  * **Through an electronic channel only if you have registered for it** under the state's police-citizen portal (Maharashtra "Mahapolice", Karnataka "Karnataka State Police"), and even then with a **physical copy follow-up**.
 +
 +The legal foundation is **BNSS 2023 §66 to §71** (service of summons) read with the **specific section** under which the notice is issued — §35, §91, §94, §175(3), §179.
 +
 +===== What a fake police notice looks like =====
 +
 +A fake police notice in 2026 is almost always a **PDF on WhatsApp or Telegram**, dispatched from a foreign-number or unknown-handle to a person who has never had any interaction with the issuing police agency. The PDF looks polished — letterhead, crest, signature, QR code — but every element is fabricated using a stock template plus a real PDF editor (Foxit / Nitro / Adobe).
 +
 +The dominant pattern: the **digital-arrest scam**. A "Mumbai Police" or "CBI" or "Cyber Crime Branch" PDF says:
 +
 +  * Your Aadhaar/Mobile/PAN is linked to a money-laundering / drug-trafficking / human-trafficking / sex-trafficking case.
 +  * The arrest warrant has already been issued.
 +  * You must "appear" on a **Skype / Zoom / WhatsApp video call** with a "police officer in uniform".
 +  * Until "verification" is complete, you are under "digital house arrest".
 +  * Move all your funds to a "**RBI Verification Escrow**" account for "**audit clearance**".
 +
 +There is no such thing as **digital arrest, RBI verification escrow, or audit clearance**. The Reserve Bank of India does not operate escrow accounts for police clearance. The Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, BNS 2024) does not mention "digital house arrest". The Constitution of India, **Article 22**, requires that an arrested person be produced before a magistrate within **24 hours** — there is no constitutional pathway for "arrest" by video call.
 +
 +===== Side-by-side comparison =====
 +
 +^ Element                          ^ Real BNSS notice                                                    ^ Fake "digital arrest" PDF                                          ^
 +| Medium                           | Paper on letterhead, hand-delivered or by post                     | PDF on WhatsApp / Telegram / email                                 |
 +| Statute cited                    | BNSS 2023 §35, §91, §94, §175(3), §179                             | Mixed-up: "IPC §420 + IT Act §66 + Aadhaar Act"                    |
 +| Dispatch / outward number        | Real, sequential, traceable at the PS                              | Random or absent; cannot be traced                                 |
 +| FIR / GD reference               | Specific PS + FIR No./Year + sections                              | Generic "FIR No. 0078/2026" without PS name                        |
 +| Issuing officer                  | Name + rank + service ID + signature + seal                        | Generic "Inspector Rakesh Kumar" + downloaded signature image      |
 +| Time given to respond            | 7 to 15 days (BNSS §35(3)) — //never// minutes                     | 1 to 4 hours — "or face arrest"                                    |
 +| Mode of arrest                   | Physical, by a uniformed officer, recorded in PS register          | "Digital arrest" by video call — does not exist in law             |
 +| Financial demand                 | None — police notices do not demand payment                        | "Audit fee", "verification escrow", "bond" to UPI / a/c number    |
 +| Verification path                | Walk into the PS, call PS landline, check on state police portal  | No verification path; aggressive video-call pressure              |
 +| Mode of reply                    | In-person at PS or written reply by RPAD                           | "Reply only via this WhatsApp number"                              |
 +
 +===== The four real BNSS notices a citizen may receive =====
 +
 +==== 1. BNSS §35 notice (was CrPC §41A) ====
 +
 +If the police want to **investigate** a person without arresting them, they issue a notice under **BNSS §35(3)** asking the person to **appear at the police station** at a stated time. The notice carries the FIR number, the sections, and the officer's name. **Time given is normally 7-15 days**, never 1-4 hours. Failure to appear can lead to arrest, but only //after// the §35 notice is properly served.
 +
 +Reference: //Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar// (2014) 8 SCC 273 — Supreme Court mandated §41A CrPC (now §35 BNSS) notices for offences carrying ≤7 years' sentence.
 +
 +==== 2. BNSS §94 notice (was CrPC §91) ====
 +
 +A police officer or court can direct any person to **produce a document or thing** under **BNSS §94**. The notice describes the document, the case, and the date+time+location for production. The witness/holder is //not// an accused; the notice does not threaten arrest.
 +
 +==== 3. BNSS §175(3) magistrate-directed investigation ====
 +
 +When a magistrate, on a private complaint, directs the police to investigate a cognizable offence, the police issue a notice based on the magistrate's order. The order copy is annexed.
 +
 +==== 4. BNSS §179 witness notice (was CrPC §160) ====
 +
 +To examine a **witness** during investigation, the police issue a notice under **BNSS §179**. Critical safeguard under **§179 proviso**: a //woman, person under 15, person above 60, person with intellectual or physical disability, or person with acute illness// **shall not be required to attend at any place other than the place where they reside**. Examination must happen at the witness's home or via video link as the SC clarified in //State of Maharashtra v. Mahesh Kariman Tirki// (2021).
 +
 +===== Where the confusion happens =====
 +
 +Citizens conflate real and fake notices because:
 +
 +  * Both carry an Indian police logo.
 +  * Both invoke fear and authority.
 +  * Both use phrases like //"under section 91"// — though the fake almost always cites the //old// **CrPC §91** which has been replaced by **BNSS §94** from **1 July 2024**.
 +  * Many citizens have never received a real police notice and have no reference point.
 +  * Some fake PDFs use real officer names lifted from press releases.
 +
 +The key conceptual anchor: a real notice is a **paper that someone hands you** or a **post packet you sign for**. A fake notice is a **file that pops up on your phone screen**.
 +
 +===== Eight red flags to spot a fake police PDF =====
 +
 +==== 1. The notice arrives on WhatsApp / Telegram / Email ====
 +
 +Indian police do not dispatch summons or §35 notices on WhatsApp. There is no enabling provision under BNSS 2023 for WhatsApp service. //Period//.
 +
 +==== 2. The PDF cites "IPC §420" or "CrPC §91" in 2026 ====
 +
 +The Indian Penal Code 1860 was replaced by **Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2024 (BNS)** with effect from 1 July 2024. The CrPC 1973 was replaced by **Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS)**. A 2026 notice citing "IPC §420" or "CrPC §91" is using outdated bare-act language — a real police officer in 2026 cites **BNS §318** (cheating) and **BNSS §94** (production of document).
 +
 +==== 3. Demand for money in the notice itself ====
 +
 +Real police notices //never// demand money. There is no such category as a "verification fee", "escrow audit fee", "case-clearance bond", or "RBI escrow". Any rupee demand within a "police notice" is fraud.
 +
 +==== 4. "Digital arrest" / "Skype interrogation" / "house arrest until verification" ====
 +
 +Indian criminal procedure has no concept of "digital arrest". Article 22 of the Constitution requires the arrested person to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours; "video interrogation while you sit at home" is a fabricated procedure.
 +
 +==== 5. Foreign mobile number, missed-call before the message ====
 +
 +Scam PDFs almost always come from +84, +66, +880, +60, +62, +91-7/+91-8 throwaway numbers. A real police PS uses its **registered landline** (visible on the state police website) or a verified WhatsApp-Business account //only if// you have opted into the state police citizen portal.
 +
 +==== 6. PDF metadata shows recent edit + consumer software ====
 +
 +Open the PDF in any viewer → //Properties// or //Document Properties//. A real notice's metadata shows the police station's MIS software (e.g., **CCTNS** — Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems) as creator. A fake notice's metadata shows //Microsoft Word 2016//, //Foxit PDF Editor//, //Adobe Acrobat Pro DC// with an edit date of yesterday.
 +
 +==== 7. The "issuing officer" is unverifiable on the state police website ====
 +
 +Every state's police website carries a **directory of officers** with name, rank, posting, and contact. Mumbai Police: [[https://www.mumbaipolice.gov.in|mumbaipolice.gov.in]]. Delhi Police: [[https://www.delhipolice.gov.in|delhipolice.gov.in]]. If the name + rank + station combination on the notice does not match the directory, it is fake.
 +
 +==== 8. The QR code in the PDF leads to a UPI page, not a police record ====
 +
 +A real police notice with a QR code (some states are piloting this in 2026) leads to the **CCTNS case-status page** for the FIR. A fake PDF's QR code leads to a UPI VPA or a fake login form.
 +
 +> **Tip** — Take a photo of the PDF cover with your other phone, walk into the **nearest police station** (any station, not necessarily the one named in the notice), show it at the front desk, and ask for verification. Front-desk officers will verify in **two minutes** by calling the issuing PS. This is free, fast, and the safest path.
 +
 +===== Step-by-step verification drill =====
 +
 +==== Step 1, 60 seconds — check the medium ====
 +
 +Paper notice handed to you / received by post → **likely real, proceed to step 2**. PDF on WhatsApp, Telegram, email, SMS → **assume fake** unless and until **step 5** confirms otherwise.
 +
 +==== Step 2, 60 seconds — read the statute cited ====
 +
 +  * "IPC §..." or "CrPC §..." in 2026 → **fake** (replaced 1 July 2024).
 +  * "BNS §..." and "BNSS §..." → potentially real, proceed.
 +  * "Aadhaar Act + IT Act 2000" with bank-clearance demand → **fake digital-arrest template**.
 +
 +==== Step 3, 60 seconds — check for a money demand ====
 +
 +Any phrase containing "verification fee", "escrow audit", "RBI clearance bond", "case-closure deposit", "advance bail bond" — **fake**. Real notices contain zero money demands.
 +
 +==== Step 4, 90 seconds — verify the issuing officer ====
 +
 +Open the state police website's officer directory. Match name + rank + posted-station. Phone the PS landline (NOT the number on the notice). Ask: "Has notice number [DISPATCH NO] been issued from your station to [YOUR NAME, PAN ending XXXX]?"
 +
 +==== Step 5, 5 minutes — walk into any police station ====
 +
 +Bring the PDF / paper notice + your Aadhaar + a photocopy. Show it at the duty officer's desk. They will telephonically verify with the issuing PS via the **CCTNS** network. Carry your phone unlocked to share the original WhatsApp message if it is a PDF case.
 +
 +==== Step 6, 10 minutes — if fake, file at NCRP + 1930 ====
 +
 +  * Dial **1930** (Cyber Crime Helpline) if money has already moved.
 +  * File at [[https://cybercrime.gov.in|cybercrime.gov.in]] → //Report Other Cyber Crime → Social Media Crime → Impersonation//.
 +  * Attach screenshots, PDF, sender number / handle.
 +
 +==== Step 7, 24 hours — paper FIR under BNS §319 + §318 + §336 + §340 + IT Act §66C + §66D ====
 +
 +For the scam itself — //impersonation of a public servant// is **BNS §204** (was IPC §170), pretending to be authorised to do an act is **BNS §319** (was §419), with cheating (§318) and forgery (§336+§340) added when a fake PDF is involved.
 +
 +===== Real-life example — Lucknow ₹68 lakh digital-arrest case =====
 +
 +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 +
 +**Lucknow digital-arrest scam — February 2026**
 +
 +  * **Victim**: Retired bank manager, age 71, Aliganj, Lucknow
 +  * **Date of first contact**: 9 February 2026, 10:14 IST
 +  * **Sender number**: +84-7xx-xxx-xxx (Vietnam SIM, hosted from a Cambodia compound)
 +  * **PDF subject**: "Mumbai Police — FIR No. 0078/2026 — Money Laundering — Aadhaar Linked"
 +  * **Statute cited (incorrectly)**: "IPC §420 + PMLA §3 + Aadhaar Act §29" — note the **IPC** reference in a 2026 PDF — a giveaway
 +  * **Demand**: Transfer all bank balance to a "RBI Verification Escrow A/c No. 50100xxxxxxxx (HDFC Bank)" within 4 hours
 +  * **Video-call duration**: 6 hours 22 minutes on Skype with a "uniformed officer"
 +  * **Total loss**: ₹68 lakh in 3 transfers (RTGS) on 9 February 2026 between 12:48 and 18:14 IST
 +  * **NCRP filing time**: 23:40 IST, 9 February 2026 (after victim's son returned home)
 +  * **Bank-freeze under RBI Master Direction 6 July 2017**: ₹41.2 lakh held at the receiving HDFC, ICICI, and IDFC First branches
 +  * **FIR**: Cyber Crime Police Station, Gomtinagar, Lucknow — BNS §318 + §319 + §336 + §340 + §204 + IT Act §66C + §66D
 +  * **MeitY blocking order**: Issued 12 February 2026 against the Skype caller-account
 +  * **Refund to victim**: ₹38.6 lakh (court-supervised escrow disbursal, 19 March 2026)
 +  * **Cost of inaction recovered**: ₹29.4 lakh permanently lost
 +
 +What made the scam work: the victim had no reference point for what a real BNSS notice looks like. Two minutes at any police station front desk would have ended it before any money moved.
 +
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +===== Sample reply to a real BNSS §35(3) notice =====
 +
 +If a **real** notice arrives at your address, this is the format of a written response (you should also consult a lawyer). Do **not** use this for a fake PDF — the fake gets a //NCRP filing//, not a reply.
 +
 +<code>
 +To,
 +The Station House Officer,
 +[POLICE STATION NAME]
 +[ADDRESS, CITY, PIN]
 +
 +Date: [DD-MM-YYYY]
 +
 +Sub: Response to Notice under §35(3) BNSS 2023
 +     dated [DD-MM-YYYY], FIR No. [XXX/YYYY], dispatch No. [XXXX/PS-XYZ/YYYY]
 +
 +Sir/Madam,
 +
 +I, [FULL NAME], son/daughter/spouse of [FATHER/SPOUSE NAME], aged
 +[YY] years, resident of [FULL ADDRESS], PAN [XXXXX1234X], Aadhaar
 +masked XXXX-XXXX-[last 4], acknowledge receipt of the above-mentioned
 +notice on [DD-MM-YYYY] at [TIME] through [hand delivery /
 +registered post AD No. XXXXX].
 +
 +  1. I will attend [POLICE STATION] on [DATE, TIME] as required,
 +     accompanied by my advocate Shri/Smt [NAME] (Bar Council Enrolment
 +     No. [XX/YYYY]).
 +
 +  2. I respectfully invoke the safeguards laid down by the Supreme
 +     Court in //Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar// (2014) 8 SCC 273
 +     and //D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal// (1997) 1 SCC 416,
 +     in particular the requirement of recording reasons for any arrest
 +     under BNSS 2023 §35(1)(b)(ii).
 +
 +  3. I am willing to co-operate with the investigation and will produce
 +     documents/material as may be specifically called for under
 +     BNSS §94.
 +
 +  4. I request that the examination be recorded by audio-video
 +     electronic means under BNSS §183(6), and that a copy of the
 +     statement be furnished to me.
 +
 +  5. As a [woman / senior citizen above 60 / person with disability /
 +     person with acute illness] within the proviso to BNSS §179,
 +     I request that any further examination be conducted at my
 +     residence or via video link.
 +
 +Place: [CITY]
 +Yours faithfully,
 +
 +[SIGNATURE]
 +[NAME]
 +Mobile: +91-XXXX-XXXXXX
 +Email: [EMAIL]
 +
 +Cc: Advocate [NAME], [Bar Council No.]
 +Cc: District Legal Services Authority, [DISTRICT]
 +</code>
 +
 +===== Case-law touchpoints =====
 +
 +  * //Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar// (2014) 8 SCC 273 — Supreme Court mandated CrPC §41A (now BNSS §35) notices for offences carrying up to 7 years' sentence; police cannot arrest as a matter of routine.
 +  * //D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal// (1997) 1 SCC 416 — 11-point arrest-safeguard checklist — memo of arrest, friend/relative information, medical examination, magistrate's notification within 24 hours; binding on every police force in India.
 +  * //Joginder Kumar v. State of UP// (1994) 4 SCC 260 — no arrest can be made //merely// because it is lawful; the necessity must be assessed.
 +  * //Lalita Kumari v. State of UP// (2014) 2 SCC 1 — Constitution Bench mandated registration of FIR for a cognizable offence; relevant when a citizen wants to compel registration against scammers.
 +  * //Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. v. SEBI// (2012) 10 SCC 603 — proportionality of investigative coercion; cited in challenges to over-broad notices.
 +  * //Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)// (2020) 10 SCC 120 — fair-investigation principles; useful when challenging an FIR that originates from a fake-notice trap.
 +
 +===== Sources & internal links =====
 +
 +==== Authoritative external sources ====
 +
 +  * Ministry of Home Affairs — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 bare text: [[https://www.indiacode.nic.in|indiacode.nic.in]]
 +  * MHA — Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) and 1930 helpline
 +  * National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal: [[https://cybercrime.gov.in|cybercrime.gov.in]]
 +  * National Crime Records Bureau — CCTNS reference: [[https://ncrb.gov.in|ncrb.gov.in]]
 +  * Mumbai Police citizen portal: [[https://www.mumbaipolice.gov.in|mumbaipolice.gov.in]]
 +  * Delhi Police citizen portal: [[https://www.delhipolice.gov.in|delhipolice.gov.in]]
 +  * Karnataka State Police: [[https://ksp.karnataka.gov.in|ksp.karnataka.gov.in]]
 +  * RBI Master Direction on Limited Liability dated 6 July 2017: [[https://rbi.org.in|rbi.org.in]]
 +
 +==== Related on RTI Wiki ====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/fake-police-notice-pdf-scam-india|Fake police notice PDF scam — full guide]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/digital-arrest-scam-india|Digital arrest scam — full guide]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/digital-arrest-scam-7-minute-rescue|Digital arrest — 7-minute rescue playbook]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/arrest-fir-notice-rights-india|Arrest, FIR and notice — citizen rights]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/fake-court-summons-whatsapp-scam-india|Fake court summons WhatsApp scam]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cyber-crime-complaint-india|Cyber-crime complaint — India]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html|AI RTI Drafter]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal Builder]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html|AwaazRTI]]
 +
 +===== FAQ =====
 +
 +==== Can the police really arrest me on a video call? ====
 +
 +No. There is no provision in **BNSS 2023, the Constitution of India Article 22**, or any state police law that permits arrest by video call. Every arrest must be (a) physical, (b) recorded in the **PS arrest register**, (c) intimated to a relative under //D.K. Basu//, and (d) followed by production before a magistrate within 24 hours. "Digital arrest" is purely a scam template.
 +
 +==== Is a WhatsApp summons ever legal in India? ====
 +
 +No. **BNSS §66 to §71** prescribes the **mode of service** of summons — through a police officer or court officer to the person named, by hand against signature, by leaving with an adult family member, by affixing at the residence, or by **registered post with AD**. There is no provision for WhatsApp service of a police notice. A few **High Courts** have allowed WhatsApp service for **civil summons** in narrow contexts after physical service has failed and only on a court order — that is not the same as a police PS sending a PDF.
 +
 +==== What if a real police officer in plain clothes calls and threatens me? ====
 +
 +Demand his **ID card** + **service number** + **PS landline number** + a **written notice under BNSS §35 / §94**. Do not respond to verbal demands. Record the conversation (one-party consent recording is lawful in India per //R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra// (1973) 1 SCC 471). If he refuses, walk to the nearest PS, show your call log, and complain to the SHO.
 +
 +==== If I am genuinely a witness in a CBI / ED / NIA case, how will I be notified? ====
 +
 +CBI, ED, NIA, and other central agencies use **paper summons** issued under their respective acts (DSPE Act 1946 §6 + BNSS §35, PMLA §50, NIA Act §43A) **dispatched by post / hand to your registered address**. They do not message you on WhatsApp, do not demand money for "case clearance", and do not threaten "digital arrest". A real CBI/ED summons carries the unit's name, the IO's name and rank, an outward number, and a date+time+room+address.
 +
 +==== Should I attend the PS alone if I get a real §35 notice? ====
 +
 +You may take a **lawyer of your choice** under BNSS §38 (right to consult an advocate during interrogation), and **§41D CrPC** rights survive into the BNSS framework. The Supreme Court in //Senior Intelligence Officer, DRI v. Jugal Kishore Samra// (2011) 12 SCC 362 recognised the lawyer's right to remain visible but out of audible range. Carry your Aadhaar, PAN, and any documents specifically asked for in the notice — nothing more.
 +
 +==== If I have already paid the scammer, will I get my money back? ====
 +
 +Possibly. The **RBI Master Direction on Limited Liability dated 6 July 2017** + I4C's NCRP-1930 pipeline can **freeze** funds at the receiving bank within the "golden hour" (first 60 minutes is best; up to 24-48 hours is workable). Frozen funds are released under a magistrate's order within 60-90 days. In 2024, the I4C network recovered **~₹2,400 crore** out of ~₹11,000 crore reported losses — a ~22% recovery rate (I4C / MHA Annual Report 2024-25).
 +
 +==== Can my own phone be used as evidence if I delete the chat? ====
 +
 +Yes — but the chain breaks if you delete. The **Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 §63** (the new IT Act §65B) certificate requires the original device-level electronic record. **Do not delete the chat, do not factory-reset the phone, do not change the SIM** until the cyber-cell takes a certified extract.
 +
 +==== Can the police send a §94 notice to my employer for my records? ====
 +
 +Yes. **BNSS §94** allows the police to require //any person// in whose possession a document or thing is, to produce it. If your salary records, bank statements, or device-image are held by your employer, a §94 notice can be served on the employer. The employer must produce, subject to privilege under **Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam §126-§129** (was IEA §126).
 +
 +==== What if the police want my phone unlocked? ====
 +
 +The **Supreme Court** in //Selvi v. State of Karnataka// (2010) 7 SCC 263 held that compulsory narco/polygraph/brain-mapping violates Article 20(3). Various High Courts (Delhi, Karnataka, Kerala) have applied the same principle to compelled biometric unlock of phones — a contested area. Position: refuse compelled unlock, demand a magistrate's order under BNSS §94 read with the Supreme Court's privilege jurisprudence, and consult a lawyer.
 +
 +==== Can I record the police officer who serves me a notice? ====
 +
 +Yes. One-party consent recording is lawful in India per //R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra// (1973). Recording an interaction with a public servant in the course of public duty is also protected as part of freedom of expression under //Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India// (2020) 3 SCC 637. Inform the officer that you are recording for the record; do not record in a way that obstructs the duty.
 +
 +===== Myth vs reality =====
 +
 +^ Myth                                                              ^ Reality                                                                                ^
 +| "Police can arrest me through a Skype call."                     | No such procedure exists in BNSS 2023 or under Article 22 of the Constitution.        |
 +| "A real police notice can come on WhatsApp."                     | BNSS §66-71 lists modes of service; WhatsApp is not one of them for police notices.   |
 +| "Real notices use 'IPC §420' and 'CrPC §91'."                    | After 1 July 2024, real notices cite BNS and BNSS sections, not IPC/CrPC.             |
 +| "If I don't pay the 'verification fee', I will be arrested."     | No category of "verification fee" exists in Indian criminal procedure.                 |
 +| "An RBI officer can ask me to move money to an 'escrow'."        | RBI does not operate escrow accounts for police-clearance; that phrase is the scam.   |
 +| "Senior citizens have to attend the PS on demand."               | BNSS §179 proviso protects 60+ — examination must happen at residence or via video.   |
 +
 +===== Last word =====
 +
 +A real police notice is a //paper// that //comes to your home//. A fake police notice is a //PDF// that //comes to your phone//. Three minutes at any police-station front desk closes any doubt for free. If the document is a fake, the NCRP–1930–RBI golden-hour pipeline is the operational rescue. If the document is real, the BNSS §35 reply template above is the right next step. The single biggest win in 2026 is for every adult Indian — especially seniors — to internalise one rule: **Indian police do not arrest, summon, fine, or threaten on WhatsApp**.
 +
 +
 +----
 +**More comparisons:** browse every RTI-vs-alternative side-by-side in [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/vs/start|RTI vs Alternatives: the full comparison hub]] <!-- rti-wiki-comparisons-hub-2026-vs-start -->
 +
 +{{tag>real_vs_fake_police_notice fake_police_notice bnss_2023 bnss_35 bnss_91 bnss_94 bnss_179 digital_arrest_scam fake_cbi_notice fake_mumbai_police d_k_basu arnesh_kumar police_summons_format cyber_crime_complaint 1930 ncrp citizen_rights_india_2026}}