Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(pio section 10,section 10 10-severability,rti section 10,pio framework 10,rti 2026)&metatag-description=(Section 10 — Severability — PIO framework under the RTI Act, 2005. Statute, gist, case law, and practical PIO guidance. Part of the PIO / FAA Knowledge Base.)}}
+====== Section 10 — Severability — PIO Framework ======
+{{ :social:auto:pio-section-10-severability.png?direct&1200 |Section 10 — Severability — PIO Framework — RTI Wiki}}
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**Quick Reply:** Section 10 — Severability — PIO framework under the RTI Act, 2005. Statute, gist, case law, and practical PIO guidance. Part of the PIO / FAA Knowledge Base.
+</WRAP>
+<WRAP center round tip 95%>
+**Need help drafting this RTI?** Use our free **[[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/rti-assistant-app.html|RTI Assistant]]** — describe your problem, get a ready-to-file Section 6(1) application with your name and address pre-filled. Also handles First Appeal and Second Appeal to the CIC/SIC.
+</WRAP>
+**Section 10 — Severability — PIO framework under the RTI Act, 2005. Statute, gist, case law, and practical PIO guidance. Part of the PIO / FAA Knowledge Base.**
+Part of the **[[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO / FAA Knowledge Base]]**.
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**In one line.** A **blanket refusal** of an entire document — when only a portion is exempt — is itself a §10 violation. The PIO must sever exempt content and release the rest, with reasoning recorded in writing.
+</WRAP>
+===== Statutory text =====
+>//Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information.//
+===== What it means in practice =====
+A **blanket refusal** of an entire document — when only a portion is exempt — is itself a §10 violation. The PIO must sever exempt content and release the rest, with reasoning recorded in writing.
+===== Case law =====
+  * //Principal, GMC Thiruvananthapuram v. KIC// (Kerala HC, 2019) — severability is favoured over blanket denial.
+  * //Namit Sharma v. UoI//, (2013) 1 SCC 745 — exemptions must be narrowly construed; §10 is the operational mechanism.
+===== PIO takeaway =====
+Default to severance. Redact the exempt item (specific name, specific line, specific paragraph) and release the rest. Record the redaction reasoning in the order.
+===== Deep dive =====
+  * **[[:explanations:grounds-for-rejection#10--severability|Full treatment on the Grounds for RTI rejection page]]**
+  * **[[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]** — how to write a reasoned reply that passes First Appeal review.
+  * **[[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO / FAA Knowledge Base]]** — the hub.
+===== Related reading =====
+  * [[:act:section-10|§10 of the Act]]
+  * [[:explanations:grounds-for-rejection|All 10 grounds for RTI rejection]]
+  * [[:faa-appellate-review-checklist|FAA appellate-review checklist]]
+  * [[:faa-first-appeal-timelines|First Appeal timelines]]
+  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
+  * [[:why-rti-gets-rejected|Why RTI gets rejected]]
+===== Sources =====
+  * Right to Information Act, 2005 — §10
+  * Cases cited above (Supreme Court of India and High Courts)
+  * Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 — §44(3)
+----
+//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
+{{tag>pio-faa section-10 rti framework}}