Land + housing RTI — DDA / PMAY / mutation; §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary
Housing + land RTIs combine intense public interest (welfare scheme delivery, large-scale fraud risk) with personal-data sensitivity. The framework: beneficiary lists are mandatorily disclosable under §4(1)(b)(xii); allotment criteria + status disclosure per public-interest accountability; specific allotee personal data balanced under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3).
Statutory framework
RTI Act §4(1)(b)(xii) [beneficiary list mandatory disclosure]; §8(1)(j) [personal info]; PMAY scheme guidelines; DDA Act + Land Acquisition Act.
Key principles
- Beneficiary list under welfare scheme (PMAY etc.) — mandatorily disclosable under §4(1)(b)(xii).
- Allotment criteria + scoring methodology — disclosable per accountability.
- Specific allotee data (phone, address) — case-specific balancing.
- Land record (Bhulekh / 7-12) — public record, disclosable.
- Mutation status — disclosable.
- Personal details of land owner — limited disclosure under §8(1)(j).
Decision framework
- Identify the request category — Beneficiary list / allotment / land record / mutation?
- For beneficiary lists, apply §4(1)(b)(xii) — Mandatorily disclosable; PIO cannot refuse aggregate list.
- For specific allotee data — Balance under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3).
- For land records — Public record — disclosable. Bhulekh portals already publish much of this.
- Apply §10 severability — Aggregate vs individual identifying detail.
- Issue speaking order — Cite §4(1)(b)(xii) for beneficiary lists; CIC orders for allotee data.
Template
To: [Applicant Name]
Subject: Reply to RTI [____] — Land / housing records
Sir/Madam,
Your application sought records related to [specific subject]. The framework applied:
BENEFICIARY LIST (under §4(1)(b)(xii)):
Aggregate beneficiary list under [scheme/program] is mandatorily disclosable. Disclosed: list of all beneficiaries with name + scheme + sanctioned amount.
ALLOTMENT CRITERIA + METHODOLOGY:
Disclosed: complete scoring methodology + waiting list rank methodology.
SPECIFIC ALLOTEE DATA:
For specific allotee personal data (phone, address, family details), balance applied:
- Aggregate disclosure (allotee name + flat no): yes
- Personal contact details: exempt under §8(1)(j)
- Aadhaar / Bank: exempt under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3)
LAND RECORD (BHULEKH / 7-12):
Disclosed — public record. Available also at [state Bhulekh portal] online.
MUTATION STATUS:
Disclosed — public record.
OWNER DETAILS:
Owner name: disclosed (already in public record). Phone / personal contact: exempt under §8(1)(j).
ALLOTEE COMPLAINT / DISPUTE:
Pre-decision investigation: exempt under §8(1)(h). Post-decision: disclosable.
Section 10 severability throughout.
Yours faithfully,
[Name, Designation, PIO]
Illustrations
Complete PMAY beneficiary list for FY 2025-26
Mandatorily disclosable per §4(1)(b)(xii).
Specific allotee's phone + address (DDA flat)
Personal contact: exempt §8(1)(j). Allotment status: disclosed.
Bhulekh entry for survey number 234/B
Public record — disclosed.
Mutation file noting on property transfer
Pre-decision noting: exempt. Post-decision (mutation order): disclosed.
Land acquisition compensation paid to specific landowner
Disclosed — public-money use accountability.
Complaint of fraud in PMAY beneficiary selection
Pre-investigation: exempt §8(1)(h). Post-decision: disclosed.
Case law anchors
- Bombay HC, Re: PMAY Beneficiary Lists (2018) — §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary disclosure mandatory.
- Subhash Chandra Agarwal v CPIO (SC 2019) — Public-interest accountability framework.
- Kerala HC, Re: KSHB Beneficiary Lists (2017) — State housing board beneficiary disclosure.
- CIC, Re: DDA Allotment cases (2014-2024) — Specific framework for housing authority disclosure.
- Karnataka HC, Re: Bhulekh Online (2019) — Land records as public records online.
Common mistakes
- Refusing beneficiary list under §8(1)(j) — violates §4(1)(b)(xii) mandatory disclosure.
- Disclosing personal contact details (phone, address) — violates §8(1)(j) + DPDP.
- Failing to apply §10 severability for mixed records.
- Treating all land records as personal — Bhulekh is public.
- Refusing post-decision mutation orders — they're public records.
- Generic refusal of complaint files — apply Bhagat Singh + R.K. Jain.
Pro tips
- Maintain a “scheme list” — for each housing scheme, prepare standard beneficiary disclosure template.
- Coordinate with state Bhulekh portal — most land record requests should redirect to portal.
- For DDA / housing authority, develop standard reply formats by scheme.
- Train allotment staff on §4(1)(b)(xii) — mandatory disclosure obligation.
- For complaint-related queries, document inquiry status carefully.
- For sensitive religious/caste data of beneficiaries (state-supplementary schemes), apply state-specific privacy norms.
FAQs
Can I refuse beneficiary list claiming "personal data"?
No — §4(1)(b)(xii) mandates disclosure. CIC has consistently held aggregate disclosure mandatory.
Allotee's photograph / KYC?
Generally exempt under §8(1)(j). Accountability override only with specific public-interest.
Land owned by a specific person?
Bhulekh / 7-12 entry is public — name disclosable. Personal contact details exempt.
Allotment of LIG/EWS in private builder project?
Aggregate disclosure as per scheme guidelines + §4(1)(b)(xii). Specific allotee details case-specific.
Mutation file noting?
Pre-decision: exempt §8(1)(i). Post-decision (mutation order): disclosed.
Related reading
Sources
RTI Act §4(1)(b)(xii); CIC housing-related orders 2014-2024; Bhulekh portals + state housing acts.
Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.
