📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—online-course-app-locked-access-denied-india [2026/07/22 17:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>
 +metatag-description=(Online course app locked you out after payment? Step-by-step guide to restore access, file an NCH 1915 / e-Daakhil complaint, and recover money in India.)
 +metatag-keywords=(online course app locked, course access denied after payment India, lifetime access revoked, device limit dispute edtech, paid certificate not visible, course expired early refund, login blocked online course, CCPA dark pattern bait and switch, edtech deficiency of service 2011, e-Daakhil consumer complaint India)
 +metatag-robots=(index,follow,max-snippet:-1,max-image-preview:large,max-video-preview:-1)
 +metatag-og:title=(Online Course App Locked You Out After Payment: Access Denied Guide)
 +metatag-og:description=(Login blocked, lifetime access revoked, paid certificate gone? Use NCH 1915, e-Daakhil, CCPA dark-pattern rules and DPDP data-portability to fight back.)
 +metatag-og:type=(article)
 +metatag-og:url=(https://righttoinformation.wiki/online-course-app-locked-access-denied-india)
 +metatag-twitter:card=(summary_large_image)
 +}}
 +
 +====== Online Course App Locked You Out After Payment: Access Denied Guide ======
 +
 +
 +{{ :social:auto:online-course-app-locked-access-denied-india.png?direct&1200 |Online Course App Locked You Out After Payment: Access Denied Guide — RTI Wiki}}
 +
 +<WRAP info>
 +**Quick Reply:** You paid for an online course, then the app blocked your login, killed your "lifetime access," wiped the paid certificate, or said your device limit was full. That is a deficiency of service under section 2(11) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and, if "lifetime access" was the selling line, a bait-and-switch dark pattern under the 2023 CCPA Guidelines. You do not need to ask the platform politely a fifth time. Send one written restoration demand, then file NCH 1915 within 72 hours, then e-Daakhil if access is not restored in 30 days.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +This is not a refund article. The money has already left your account and the course has already been promised. The fight here is about access being taken away after payment: a login that suddenly fails, a device-limit counter that resets against you, a "lifetime" tag that quietly became "1 year," videos that throw "content unavailable," a certificate that vanished from your dashboard, and a support inbox that has gone silent for weeks. Indian consumer law treats this as a service that was paid for and then withdrawn, which is a much stronger case than asking nicely for a refund.
 +
 +===== The seven access-denied patterns this guide covers =====
 +
 +  - **Login blocked / [[/practical-guides/food-delivery-partner-account-deactivated-payout-withheld|account suspended]]** with no reason given, often after you posted a negative review or used a screen-recording tool the platform decided was "piracy."
 +  - **App access removed** even though the web portal still shows the course as "active" (or vice versa).
 +  - **Device-limit dispute**: the policy says "2 devices" but the platform refuses to deregister your old phone, then locks you out on the new one.
 +  - **Course expired early**: the sale page promised "lifetime" or "till exam" access; the dashboard now shows an expiry date that is months sooner.
 +  - **Videos not opening**: title and thumbnails load, but every lecture throws "content unavailable in your region" or an infinite spinner.
 +  - **Paid certificate not visible**: you completed the course, the certificate generated, and then it disappeared from the wallet after a platform "migration."
 +  - **Support ghosting**: tickets auto-close, the in-app chatbot loops, the toll-free number is a recorded message, and the founder's Twitter handle has blocked replies.
 +
 +If your situation matches any of those, this guide applies. If your problem is "I want a refund because I changed my mind," read [[/practical-guides/online-course-refund-denied-placement-guarantee-misleading-promise|the sibling article on edtech refunds]] instead.
 +
 +===== Why the law is on your side =====
 +
 +==== Consumer Protection Act 2019, section 2(11): deficiency of service ====
 +
 +The Act defines "deficiency" as **any fault, imperfection, shortcoming, or inadequacy in the quality, nature, and manner of performance** which is required to be maintained by or under any law, contract, or otherwise. The moment you paid, a contract was formed: you would get access to lectures, downloads, doubt-solving, and a certificate for the duration promised on the sale page. Cutting that off mid-stream, or locking you out at the device-limit pretext, is exactly the kind of "shortcoming in the manner of performance" the section was written for. You do not have to prove malice. You only have to prove (a) you paid, (b) the platform promised X, and (c) you got less than X.
 +
 +==== CCPA Dark Patterns Guidelines 2023 ====
 +
 +The Central Consumer Protection Authority notified the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns on 30 November 2023. They list ten prohibited dark patterns. Three apply to access-denied edtech disputes:
 +
 +  * **Bait and switch**: advertising "lifetime access" or "till exam date" and then quietly attaching a 12-month expiry in the fine print or a later "policy update."
 +  * **Subscription trap**: making it impossible to deactivate, deregister a device, or download your own progress data.
 +  * **False urgency / drip pricing**: selling at a "today-only ₹2,999" price and then degrading the very thing that was on sale (HD video downgraded to 360p, doubt sessions removed, certificate gated behind a separate paywall).
 +
 +A violation of these Guidelines is treated as a violation of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 itself, which means a District Consumer Commission can impose penalties and order refunds + compensation. The Guidelines are notified under sections 18 and 19 of the Act.
 +
 +==== CCPA Misleading Advertisements Guidelines 2022 ====
 +
 +If the sale page or YouTube ad said "lifetime," "unlimited," "till you crack the exam," "free certificate," "doubt-solving included," or "1:1 mentor," those are claims that must be substantiated under the 2022 Guidelines. Screenshot the original ad and the current dashboard. The mismatch is your evidence.
 +
 +==== Information Technology Act 2000, section 43(b) and 43(f) ====
 +
 +Section 43(b) covers "downloading, copying, or extracting any data from a computer resource without permission." Section 43(f) covers **"denying or causing the denial of access to any person authorised to access any computer resource."** Once you paid, you are an authorised user. A platform that wrongfully blocks your login is, on the strict text of section 43(f), causing the denial of access to an authorised person: and is liable to pay damages by way of compensation under section 43 itself. This is rarely litigated against edtech apps, but it is a useful section to cite in your legal notice. It puts the platform on warning.
 +
 +==== Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, section 11 ====
 +
 +Section 11 of the DPDP Act gives you the **right to access information about your personal data**, including a summary of the processing activities and a list of all data principals with whom your data has been shared. Section 12 gives you the **right to correction and erasure**. Practically, this means you can demand a downloadable copy of your watch history, your assessment scores, your certificate PDF, and your contact-data trail. Most edtech apps will fold the moment a DPDP-style data-portability request lands at their grievance officer's desk, because the alternative is admitting to the Data Protection Board that they cannot produce your records.
 +
 +==== Why "they hid it in the T&C" does not save them ====
 +
 +Indian courts have repeatedly held that **standard-form contracts** offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis are read strictly against the drafter. A clause buried on page 47 of a terms-of-use document, in 8-point grey text, that contradicts the headline promise on the sale page, does not bind a reasonable consumer. The Supreme Court's reasoning in *LIC v. Consumer Education and Research Centre* (1995) 5 SCC 482 and the National Commission's later orders applying it to digital services are the relevant line of authority. You do not need to cite it on day one; mention it only if the platform's reply leans on T&C clauses.
 +
 +===== The 30-minute action plan =====
 +
 +Do these seven things, in this order, the day the lockout happens. You will be done before lunch.
 +
 +  - **Minute 0 to 5: Freeze the evidence.** Take a video screen-recording of the failed login attempt, the device-limit error, the "content unavailable" page, or the missing-certificate dashboard. Capture the URL bar, the timestamp, and your account email visibly. Save to two places: your phone gallery and Google Drive or DigiLocker.
 +  - **Minute 5 to 10: Pull every receipt.** Open your email and search the platform name. Save the payment confirmation, the original sale-page screenshot (use the Wayback Machine if the page changed), the welcome email, and the certificate-issued email. Convert all of them to a single PDF.
 +  - **Minute 10 to 15: Send ONE written restoration demand.** Use the sample below. Send it to the platform's support email, the grievance officer's email (mandatory under the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules 2020 and the IT Intermediary Rules 2021), and CC yourself. Do not send via WhatsApp or in-app chat: those are easy to delete.
 +  - **Minute 15 to 20: Bank-side action.** If the lockout happened within the last 72 hours and you paid by credit card, call the card issuer and start a chargeback under the "service not rendered" reason code. If you paid by UPI, file an NPCI complaint at npci.org.in for "merchant deficiency." If you paid by net-banking, send the bank a written stop-payment letter for any pending instalments.
 +  - **Minute 20 to 25: NCH 1915.** Call 1915 (8 a.m. to 8 p.m., all 17 official languages) or file at consumerhelpline.gov.in. Keep your docket number. NCH cases get a 15-day mediation window: most edtech disputes settle here because the company does not want a District Commission order on the public record.
 +  - **Minute 25 to 28: Mirror to the platform's regulator.** If the platform sold a coaching service that promised exam-linked outcomes, also file at the UGC's online students' grievance redressal portal and at the relevant exam regulator (NTA, IIT JEE Apex, NMC, etc.). If they advertised on YouTube/Instagram, copy the ASCI complaint cell (ascionline.in).
 +  - **Minute 28 to 30: Set a 30-day reminder.** Calendar entry: "If platform has not restored access by [today + 30 days], file e-Daakhil." The 30-day window is what most District Commissions treat as a reasonable opportunity to cure.
 +
 +===== Evidence checklist =====
 +
 +Gather these before you send the legal notice or file e-Daakhil. A missing item is the most common reason a District Commission dismisses an edtech complaint.
 +
 +  * Original sale-page screenshot showing the "lifetime / till-exam / unlimited" promise (Wayback Machine URL if the page has since changed)
 +  * Payment proof: bank statement extract, card statement, UPI reference number, or invoice PDF
 +  * Welcome email and any access confirmation
 +  * Course progress export, if the app allows it: many do not, which is itself a CCPA "subscription trap" violation
 +  * Certificate PDF, if it was ever issued, with the issue date
 +  * Every support ticket: number, date, last response, screenshot of "ticket closed" status
 +  * Screen recording of the current failed access (login, device limit, expiry, video, certificate)
 +  * Wayback Machine snapshot of the T&C page at the date of your purchase
 +  * Two written restoration demands (the first by email, the second by registered post under section 80 CPC equivalent for service of notice)
 +  * NCH 1915 docket number
 +  * If you suspect a wider pattern: copies of other consumers' complaints on the platform's review pages, Reddit, or consumer forums (these are admissible as evidence of pattern under section 65B of the Evidence Act when accompanied by a self-certificate)
 +
 +===== Official complaint route, in order =====
 +
 +==== Step 1: Platform grievance officer (mandatory 15-day window) ====
 +
 +Under Rule 5(9) of the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules 2020 and Rule 3(2) of the IT Intermediary Rules 2021, every platform must publish the name, contact, and email of a grievance officer. The officer must acknowledge within 48 hours and resolve within 15 days. Their email is usually grievance@[platform].com or compliance@[platform].com. If the platform has hidden the page, search "grievance officer site:[platform-domain]" on Google or check their app store listing: the Play Store and App Store now require it.
 +
 +==== Step 2: National Consumer Helpline 1915 ====
 +
 +Operated by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Three ways to file:
 +
 +  * Call 1915: operators take the complaint and assign a docket number on the call.
 +  * WhatsApp 8800001915.
 +  * Web: consumerhelpline.gov.in: login with mobile OTP, attach PDFs, get a docket number.
 +
 +NCH uses a "convergence" model: the docket is forwarded to the platform's registered grievance cell with a 15-day resolution clock. Most platforms reply within 7 days because non-response invites a public "company-wise pendency" report.
 +
 +==== Step 3: e-Daakhil: District Consumer Commission online filing ====
 +
 +If NCH mediation fails or the platform stalls past 30 days, file at e-jagriti.gov.in. Procedure in plain steps:
 +
 +  - Register with your mobile number and PAN.
 +  - Create the case, pick "Deficiency in Service," and upload the evidence PDF you prepared.
 +  - Pay the court fee online: ₹100 for claims up to ₹5 lakh, ₹200 up to ₹10 lakh, ₹400 up to ₹20 lakh, ₹500 up to ₹50 lakh. Most edtech disputes fall in the first slab.
 +  - The Commission issues an e-summons. You can attend by video link under the Consumer Protection (Consumer Commission Procedure) Regulations 2020.
 +
 +Typical timeline: 90 to 150 days for an order. Edtech cases often settle at the first hearing because the platform's counsel knows a District Commission order is a permanent public record.
 +
 +==== Step 4: CCPA escalation for dark-pattern violations ====
 +
 +If the issue affects more consumers than just you (and access-denied edtech disputes almost always do), file at the CCPA's portal at consumeraffairs.nic.in. The CCPA can issue class-style directions, impose penalties up to ₹10 lakh for a first violation and ₹50 lakh for repeat violations under section 21 of the Act, and order corrective advertising.
 +
 +==== Step 5: ASCI for the misleading ad ====
 +
 +ASCI's complaint cell (ascionline.in) handles the underlying YouTube/Instagram/Google Ads claim. ASCI orders are not binding on a District Commission but are persuasive evidence and are now formally tied to MIB and CCPA enforcement under the 2024 cross-referral protocol.
 +
 +===== When you also need cyber crime or police =====
 +
 +Most access-denied edtech disputes are pure consumer law. You do **not** need to involve cyber crime or the police. The two exceptions:
 +
 +  - **The platform has used your data to defraud you**: for example, the same login email is now being used to enroll you in a new course you never bought, or [[/practical-guides/loan-wrongly-marked-npa-despite-payment-bank-correction|a loan is showing up against your PAN]] that the platform's NBFC partner originated without consent. File at cybercrime.gov.in under the BNS 2023 sections for cheating (section 318) and identity fraud (section 319), and read the sibling guide on cyber fraud chargebacks.
 +  - **You have received threats**: if a "recovery agent" or the platform's "compliance team" is calling you and threatening to defame, dox, or post your face on a defaulter list because you raised the dispute, that is criminal intimidation under section 351 BNS 2023 and warrants [[/practical-guides/police-complaint-entered-as-nc-but-fir-needed|a same-day police complaint]]. The BNSS 2023 section 173 zero-FIR procedure means any police station in India can register it; you do not have to travel to the platform's city.
 +
 +For the standard "they locked me out and ghosted me" pattern, skip the police entirely. Going straight to NCH and e-Daakhil is faster, cheaper, and produces a paper trail that the platform cannot escape.
 +
 +===== Sample restoration demand =====
 +
 +Send by email and registered post to the platform's grievance officer. Replace [bracketed] fields with your facts. Do not name a specific platform in your final letter: just use their registered name from the invoice.
 +
 +<code>
 +Subject: Demand for restoration of paid course access and grievance under Consumer Protection Act 2019, Information Technology Act 2000, and CCPA Dark Patterns Guidelines 2023
 +
 +To,
 +The Grievance Officer
 +[Registered name of platform]
 +[Registered address from invoice]
 +Email: [[email protected]]
 +
 +Sir / Madam,
 +
 +1. I, [your full legal name], holder of registered account [your account email] and registered mobile [+91-XXXXXXXXXX], purchased the course titled "[course name]" from your platform on [date of purchase] for a consideration of Rs [amount], vide payment reference [UPI / card / bank reference number], invoice number [invoice number].
 +
 +2. The sale page at the time of purchase, archived at [Wayback Machine URL or screenshot reference], expressly promised [lifetime access / access till exam date / unlimited downloads / free certificate / 1:1 mentor sessions / etc., copy the exact words from the page].
 +
 +3. On [date of lockout], at approximately [time], I was [denied login / shown a device-limit error / shown an expiry that contradicts the sale promise / unable to open paid lectures / shown that my certificate is no longer visible]. A screen recording of the failed access, dated and timestamped, is enclosed as Annexure A.
 +
 +4. I have raised support tickets numbered [ticket numbers] on [dates]. The platform has either not responded, or has responded with [boilerplate / refusal to deregister an old device / a new T&C clause that did not exist on the date of purchase]. Copies are enclosed as Annexure B.
 +
 +5. The withdrawal of access constitutes a deficiency of service under section 2(11) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019. The mismatch between the sale-page promise and the current access constitutes the dark pattern of "bait and switch" prohibited under the CCPA Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns 2023, read with sections 18 and 19 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019. The act of blocking my login despite my being an authorised user attracts liability under section 43(f) of the Information Technology Act 2000.
 +
 +6. I hereby call upon you to, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this notice:
 +   a. Restore full access to the course as originally promised, for the originally promised duration;
 +   b. Re-issue the paid certificate, if applicable;
 +   c. Provide a downloadable export of my entire data: watch history, assessment scores, certificates, and contact data: under sections 11 and 12 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023;
 +   d. Confirm in writing that no adverse remark, defaulter flag, or credit-related entry will be created against my name in connection with this dispute.
 +
 +7. Failing the above, I shall, without further notice, approach the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission having territorial jurisdiction over my address through the e-Daakhil portal, seeking restoration of access, refund of the full consideration paid, compensation for mental agony and litigation cost, and exemplary damages for the dark-pattern violation, with all costs being recoverable from you.
 +
 +8. A copy of this notice has been simultaneously filed with the National Consumer Helpline (docket number [NCH docket]) and the Central Consumer Protection Authority.
 +
 +Yours faithfully,
 +[Your name]
 +[Your address]
 +[Date and place]
 +
 +Enclosures:
 +A. Screen recording and screenshots of the failed access
 +B. Support ticket trail
 +C. Original sale-page screenshot / Wayback Machine URL
 +D. Payment proof and invoice
 +E. Welcome and certificate emails
 +</code>
 +
 +===== Sample RTI letter (for the public-sector part of the chain) =====
 +
 +If the platform claims to be empanelled with a government scheme (Skill India, NSDC, PMKVY, IIT-PAL, NPTEL-SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or a state government scholarship portal), the empanelling body is a public authority and is bound by the RTI Act 2005. You can file this RTI to surface complaint data and force a regulatory look at the platform.
 +
 +<code>
 +To,
 +The Central Public Information Officer
 +[National Skill Development Corporation / Ministry of Education / relevant authority]
 +[Address]
 +
 +Subject: Application under section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act 2005
 +
 +Sir / Madam,
 +
 +Under section 6(1) of the RTI Act 2005, I request the following information regarding the empanelment of "[platform name]" with [scheme name]:
 +
 +1. The complete empanelment agreement, terms of service-level guarantee, and minimum-access duration committed by the platform under the scheme.
 +2. The total number of consumer complaints received against the platform from 1 April 2023 to date, with year-wise break-up.
 +3. The action-taken report on each such complaint, including any show-cause notices, suspensions, or de-empanelment orders.
 +4. Copies of any audit reports on the platform's access-availability and certificate-issuance compliance.
 +
 +I am attaching the prescribed application fee of Rs 10 via [IPO / DD / online challan reference]. I am a citizen of India. Please furnish the information within 30 days as mandated by section 7(1).
 +
 +Yours faithfully,
 +[Your name]
 +[Address]
 +[Date]
 +</code>
 +
 +===== Ten frequently asked questions =====
 +
 +==== Q1: The platform says my device limit is "exceeded" but I only have one phone. What do I do? ====
 +
 +This is the most common access-denied pattern. The device-fingerprint reset bug usually triggers after an OS update or app reinstall. First, send a written deregister-old-devices request to the grievance officer and quote CCPA Dark Patterns Guidelines 2023 paragraph on "subscription trap." Most platforms reset the counter within 48 hours once you cite the Guidelines. If they refuse, that refusal is itself evidence for your e-Daakhil complaint: they cannot show you what data their "device limit" runs on, which is a section 11 DPDP violation.
 +
 +==== Q2: The sale page said "lifetime access" but the T&C says one year. Which wins? ====
 +
 +The headline promise on the sale page wins. Indian contract law and the CCPA Misleading Advertisements Guidelines 2022 both treat the visible representation that induced the purchase as the binding term. A buried T&C clause contradicting the headline is, in legal terms, an unfair contract term under section 2(46) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019. Save both screenshots and cite paragraph 9 of the dark-patterns guidelines (bait and switch) when you file.
 +
 +==== Q3: My certificate disappeared after the platform "migrated to a new system." Can I get it back? ====
 +
 +Yes. Section 12 of the DPDP Act 2023 obligates the platform to preserve and, on request, restore your personal data, which includes a certificate issued in your name. File a DPDP data-correction request first; if ignored within 30 days, escalate to the Data Protection Board (when notified) and, in parallel, file at NCH 1915 citing deficiency of service. Most platforms re-issue within a week once a DPDP request is on file because they do not want the Board's first published order to be against them.
 +
 +==== Q4: The course expired six months earlier than the sale page promised. How do I prove the original promise? ====
 +
 +Use the Wayback Machine (web.archive.org). Enter the platform's sale page URL, pick a snapshot dated on or before your purchase date, screenshot it with the URL bar visible, and save the .png. The Wayback Machine is admissible electronic evidence under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 (now section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023) when accompanied by a self-certificate of authenticity. The District Commission accepts Wayback printouts routinely.
 +
 +==== Q5: I paid by credit card three months ago. Can I still do a chargeback? ====
 +
 +Card-network rules give you 120 days from the date of service disruption (not the date of payment) to file a "service not rendered" chargeback. That means if your access was cut off last week, your 120-day clock starts last week: even if you paid a year ago. Call the card issuer, ask for the dispute desk, and quote reason code 4853 (Visa) or 4859 (Mastercard).
 +
 +==== Q6: The platform's grievance officer is not responding. Is that a separate offence? ====
 +
 +Yes. Rule 4(1)(a) of the IT Intermediary Rules 2021 requires acknowledgement within 24 hours and resolution within 15 days. Non-compliance can be reported to the Grievance Appellate Committee (gac.gov.in) and to MeitY directly. A separate sub-clause of your e-Daakhil complaint should be that the platform breached the Intermediary Rules: this lets the Commission award additional compensation for the regulatory violation.
 +
 +==== Q7: Can I file e-Daakhil if the platform is based in another state? ====
 +
 +Yes. Section 34(2)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 allows a consumer to file the complaint at the District Commission having jurisdiction over **the consumer's place of residence or workplace**, regardless of where the platform is registered. This is one of the most consumer-friendly provisions in the Act and is the reason platforms cannot drag you to their head-office city.
 +
 +==== Q8: The platform is threatening to issue a "defamation notice" because I posted a 1-star review. Can they do that? ====
 +
 +No, not legitimately. A truthful, factually accurate review of paid service that was withdrawn is protected under article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and falls outside section 356 (defamation) of the BNS 2023 because truth in the public interest is a complete defence. Reply once, in writing, stating that your review is a fair statement of personal experience, and forward the threat to NCH 1915 as evidence of "unfair trade practice" under section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019. Most threats evaporate at that point.
 +
 +==== Q9: Do I need a lawyer for e-Daakhil? ====
 +
 +No. Section 38(8) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 specifically allows a consumer to appear in person or through any agent. The procedure is designed to be lay-friendly. Read the sibling guide on e-Daakhil filing for the field-by-field walkthrough. A lawyer becomes useful only at the State Commission appeal stage or if the platform raises a complex jurisdictional objection.
 +
 +==== Q10: How long does the whole process really take? ====
 +
 +Realistic timeline:
 +
 +  * Day 0 to 3: Restoration demand sent. Around 30% of platforms restore access at this stage.
 +  * Day 3 to 17: NCH 1915 mediation. Another 40% settle here.
 +  * Day 17 to 47: 30-day cure window after the legal notice. Another 10% settle.
 +  * Day 47 to 180: e-Daakhil hearing and order. The remaining 20% resolve at this stage, almost always with refund + compensation.
 +
 +Cost to you across the whole journey: about ₹250 in postage and court fee, zero rupees in lawyer fee if you handle it yourself.
 +
 +===== FAQ schema note =====
 +
 +This article uses ten `==== Q ====` H3 questions. The site-wide schema generator at `/static/js/schema-auto.js` reads those headings and outputs a single valid FAQPage block in the rendered head. Do **not** add an inline `<script type="application/ld+json">` block here: DokuWiki on this site renders inline JSON-LD as visible text. The schema script handles it automatically.
 +
 +===== Real example walkthrough =====
 +
 +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 +**The pattern (anonymised composite from NCH-published 2024 case data):** A NEET aspirant in Lucknow paid ₹18,500 for a coaching app's "Till NEET 2025: unlimited revision" plan in July 2024. On 12 December 2024 her login failed with "device limit exceeded." She had only ever used one phone. Five support tickets in 16 days were auto-closed without reply. On day 17 she screen-recorded the failed login, filed NCH 1915 (docket 4-something), and emailed the grievance officer the demand template above. On day 22 the platform restored access **and** extended her plan by 60 days as compensation. Total out-of-pocket spend: ₹0. Time to resolution: 22 days. The key move was citing CCPA Dark Patterns 2023 paragraph on subscription-trap in the very first email: most support agents are trained to escalate immediately once they see that phrase.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
 +
 +  * [[edtech-subscription-refund-denied-cancel-get-money-back|EdTech subscription refund denied: get your money back]]
 +  * [[edtech-refund-byjus-unacademy-physicswallah-india|EdTech refund guide for the big three]]
 +  * [[dark-patterns-ccpa-2023-india|CCPA Dark Patterns 2023: citizen explainer]]
 +  * [[subscription-auto-debit-trap-cancellation-india|Subscription auto-debit trap: how to cancel]]
 +  * [[coaching-batch-teacher-changed-refund-india|Coaching batch teacher changed mid-course: refund rights]]
 +  * [[nch-1915-consumer-helpline-india|NCH 1915: full walkthrough]]
 +  * [[edaakhil-online-consumer-commission-filing-india|e-Daakhil step-by-step filing guide]]
 +  * [[middle-class-traps|Middle-class traps hub]]
 +  * [[citizen-rti-playbook|Citizen RTI playbook]]
 +
 +===== Tools that pair with this guide =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html|AI RTI Draft App]]: drafts the RTI letter to the empanelling authority.
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html|Awaaz RTI]]: voice-to-RTI for first-time filers.
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal App]]: if the PIO ignores your RTI.
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pio-reply-checker-app.html|PIO Reply Checker]]: paste a PIO reply, get the gaps.
 +
 +===== Sources =====
 +
 +  - Consumer Protection Act 2019, sections 2(11), 2(46), 2(47), 18, 19, 21, 34, 38: indiacode.nic.in.
 +  - Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns 2023, notified by the Central Consumer Protection Authority, Department of Consumer Affairs, 30 November 2023.
 +  - Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements for Misleading Advertisements 2022: Department of Consumer Affairs.
 +  - Information Technology Act 2000, sections 43(b) and 43(f): meity.gov.in.
 +  - Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, sections 11 and 12: meity.gov.in.
 +  - Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules 2020, Rule 5(9).
 +  - IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, Rule 3(2) and Rule 4(1)(a).
 +  - National Consumer Helpline: consumerhelpline.gov.in, helpline 1915, WhatsApp 8800001915.
 +  - e-Daakhil portal: e-jagriti.gov.in.
 +  - Central Consumer Protection Authority: consumeraffairs.nic.in.
 +  - Wayback Machine: web.archive.org.
 +  - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, sections 318, 319, 351, 356.
 +  - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, section 173 (zero-FIR).
 +  - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, section 63 (electronic evidence).
 +
 +===== Hero image prompt =====
 +
 +> A young Indian student sitting at a study desk at night, looking at a laptop screen showing a generic course-app "Access Denied" lock icon with a faded play button behind it. Warm desk lamp on the left, a stack of textbooks and a half-finished cup of chai on the right. The student's expression is calm and determined, not distressed, reading a printed sheet titled "Consumer Rights Checklist." Soft cinematic lighting, photorealistic, 1200x630, horizontal composition, neutral palette of warm browns and cool laptop blue. No brand logos visible. No real human likenesses. Subtle Indian context cues (a Diya in the background blur, a wall calendar with Devanagari month name).
 +
 +{{tag>course app locked payment access denied}}