Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | mortgage-redemption-suit-section-60-tpa-india [2026/08/02 03:36] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | ====== Get your title deeds back: Section 60 TPA ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick reply:** If your lender is a **bank or an NBFC**, stop here. That is the SARFAESI route, with a far shorter window, set out in [[https:// | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Article 61(a) of the Limitation Act, 1963 gives a mortgagor thirty years to sue for redemption. That is the most dangerous comfort in Indian property law, because at least three things can shut the door long before those thirty years are up. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The clock, and why waiting is still risky ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Schedule to the Act is plain. A suit "by a mortgagor to redeem or recover possession of immovable property mortgaged" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Situation ^ Article ^ Period ^ Runs from ^ | ||
| + | | You sue to redeem or to get possession back | 61(a) | 30 years | When the right to redeem or to recover possession accrues | | ||
| + | | The lender had possession and has sold the property on for value | 61(b) | 12 years | When the transfer becomes known to you | | ||
| + | | The lender sues you to foreclose | 63(a) | 30 years | When the money secured by the mortgage becomes due | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thirty years can therefore collapse to twelve the moment a lender in possession sells to a buyer. The proviso to section 60 is a second exit: the right is gone once it "has been extinguished by act of the parties or by decree of a Court", | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step one: name your mortgage correctly ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Section 58 defines six kinds, and the clause letter changes what a court can order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Clause ^ Name ^ What it looks like in real life ^ | ||
| + | | 58(b) | Simple mortgage | You kept possession, promised personally to pay, agreed he may have the property sold on default | | ||
| + | | 58(c) | Mortgage by conditional sale | Reads like a sale that turns absolute on default. Not a mortgage unless that condition sits inside the document effecting the sale | | ||
| + | | 58(d) | Usufructuary mortgage | He took possession and keeps the rent or the crop in place of interest | | ||
| + | | 58(e) | English mortgage | You promised to repay by a date and transferred the property absolutely, with a proviso to re-transfer on payment | | ||
| + | | 58(f) | Mortgage by deposit of title-deeds | You handed title documents over intending to create security. Commonly called an equitable mortgage | | ||
| + | | 58(g) | Anomalous mortgage | Anything that is none of the five above | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two details on 58(f) that most guides skip. The bare Act limits it to Calcutta, Madras and Bombay "and in any other town which the State Government concerned may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What Section 60 actually entitles you to ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | At any time after the principal money has become due, on payment or tender at a proper time and place of the mortgage-money, | ||
| + | |||
| + | - deliver "to the mortgagor the mortgage-deed and all documents relating to the mortgaged property which are in the possession or power of the mortgagee"; | ||
| + | - deliver possession, where he is in possession of the property; | ||
| + | - at your cost, either re-transfer the property to you or to a third person you name, or execute and, where the mortgage was made by a registered instrument, have registered an acknowledgement in writing that any right in derogation of your interest transferred to him has been extinguished. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The section names the remedy: "The right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption." | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round tip 95%> | ||
| + | **The right nobody uses: section 60B.** "A mortgagor, as long as his right of redemption subsists, shall be entitled at all reasonable times, at his request and at his own cost, and on payment of the mortgagee' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Section 60A is the refinancing tool: instead of a re-transfer to you, you may require him to assign the mortgage-debt and transfer the property to a third person you direct, and he is bound to do it. It does not apply to a mortgagee who is or has been in possession. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A lock-in clause does not defeat you ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In **Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit**, decided 4 November 1988 and reported at 1989 AIR 436 and 1989 (1) SCC 458, the Supreme Court recorded that "the rights and liabilities of the mortgagor are controlled by the provisions of section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882", that "any provision inserted to prevent, evade or hamper redemption is void", and that this is implied in the maxim "once a mortgage always a mortgage" | ||
| + | |||
| + | In **Shivdev Singh v. Sucha Singh**, decided 31 March 2000 and reported at 2000 (4) SCC 326 and AIR 2000 SC 1935, a deed fixed a mortgage term of 99 years. Every court below held that term to be a clog and the Supreme Court agreed, holding that a mortgage " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Before you sue: five things to do first ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Tender the money in writing.** Section 60 speaks of " | ||
| + | - **Send the section 60B demand** to inspect and copy the title documents he is holding. | ||
| + | - **Get an Encumbrance Certificate** from the Sub-Registrar covering the whole period. See [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Buy a certified copy of the registered mortgage deed.** Section 57 of the Registration Act, 1908 keeps Books 1 and 2 and the Index to Book 1 open to inspection on payment of fees and requires copies of entries to be given to all persons applying. Section 57(5) makes those signed and sealed copies " | ||
| + | - **If nothing is registered, | ||
| + | |||
| + | RTI does not reach a private lender. It does reach the Sub-Registrar. If that office sits on your EC or certified copy, a section 6(1) application for file movement and the reason for delay starts a 30-day clock under section 7(1). Draft it with the [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== He has vanished, or died, or wants more money ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Deposit the money in court.** Section 83 lets you, at any time after the principal money payable has become due and before a redemption suit is barred, deposit the amount remaining due in any court in which you could have filed the suit, to the mortgagee' | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Stop the interest.** Under section 84, once you have tendered or deposited, interest on the principal ceases from the date of tender, or on a deposit made without a prior tender, as soon as you have done everything required of you to let him draw the money and the section 83 notice has been served. The proviso carries a warning: deposit without a prior tender, then withdraw the money, and interest runs again from the date of withdrawal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Sue the heirs.** Section 59A says references to mortgagors and mortgagees include persons deriving title from them. Order 34 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 requires everyone with an interest in the mortgage-security or in the right of redemption to be joined. Implead every legal representative. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Do not accept his arithmetic.** Order 34 Rule 7(1)(a) directs the court, in a successful redemption suit, to take an account of what is due to the defendant for principal and interest, the costs of suit awarded to him, and other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred in respect of the mortgage-security, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The suit, and what the decree says ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | File in the civil court with pecuniary jurisdiction over the value, where the property lies. On court fees, resist every number you read online. The central Court-fees Act, 1870 computes the fee in a suit against a mortgagee for recovery of the mortgaged property " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under Order 34 Rule 7 the court passes a **preliminary decree** taking or declaring the account, and fixes a date within six months of that step by which you must pay the sum into court. On payment the defendant must deliver up all documents relating to the property, re-transfer it at your cost free from the mortgage and from encumbrances he created, and if necessary put you in possession. Rule 7(2) lets the court extend that date on good cause shown. Rule 8 converts it into a **final decree** ordering exactly those three things. Miss the deadline and Rule 7(1) lets him apply instead for a sale, or, in a mortgage by conditional sale or such an anomalous mortgage, for a decree debarring you from redeeming. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Redemption is still not finished when the money moves. Where the mortgage was made by a registered instrument, section 60(c) entitles you to a **registered** acknowledgement that his interest is extinguished, | ||
| + | |||
| + | If he refuses to sign after the decree, you do not sue again, you execute: see [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== How long do I have to file a redemption suit? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thirty years under Article 61(a) of the Limitation Act, 1963, running from when the right to redeem or to recover possession accrues. Because section 60 makes that right arise after the principal money has become due, it is normally the maturity date of the loan, not the day the deeds changed hands. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== He says the deed fixed a term that has expired, so the property is his. Is it? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not on that ground alone. In Shivdev Singh v. Sucha Singh the Supreme Court upheld findings that a 99-year term was a clog on the equity of redemption, holding that a mortgage cannot be made altogether irredeemable or redemption made illusory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== He has gone quiet and will not accept my money. What do I do? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use section 83. Deposit the amount remaining due in the court where you could have sued, to his account. He cannot draw that money without depositing the mortgage-deed and every other document he holds relating to the property. Under section 84 interest on the principal stops running. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The lender died. Do I sue his sons? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, his legal representatives. Section 59A treats references to a mortgagee as including persons deriving title from him, and Order 34 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 requires everyone interested in the mortgage-security or in the right of redemption to be joined. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I redeem only my share of the property? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ordinarily no. Section 60 says nothing in it entitles a person interested in a share only to redeem that share on a proportionate payment, with a narrow exception where the mortgagee, or all of them, has acquired a mortgagor' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== He is demanding far more than I borrowed. Must I pay it to redeem? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. Tender what you calculate, and if he refuses, let the court fix the figure. Order 34 Rule 7(1)(a) makes the court take an account of principal, interest, costs awarded to him and other costs, charges and expenses properly incurred in respect of the mortgage-security, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I see the documents he is holding before I file? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes. Section 60B entitles you, while your right of redemption subsists, to inspect and make copies, abstracts or extracts of the documents of title relating to the mortgaged property in his custody or power, at reasonable times and at your own cost. Ask in writing by registered post. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Nothing shows in my Encumbrance Certificate. Was there no mortgage? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not necessarily. Section 59 requires registration only where the principal is ₹100 or more and the mortgage is something other than a deposit of title-deeds, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What will the court fee be? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is no single national answer and you should not budget from one. The central Court-fees Act, 1870 computes the fee according to the principal money expressed to be secured by the instrument, but most large states have enacted their own Court Fees Act. Confirm at the filing counter. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Transfer of Property Act, 1882, sections 58, 59, 59A, 60, 60A, 60B, 83 and 84, bare Act PDF at indiacode.nic.in/ | ||
| + | * Limitation Act, 1963, Schedule, Articles 61 and 63, bare Act PDF at indiacode.nic.in/ | ||
| + | * Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXXIV Rules 1, 7 and 8, bare Act PDF at indiacode.nic.in/ | ||
| + | * Registration Act, 1908, sections 17 and 57, bare Act PDF at indiacode.nic.in/ | ||
| + | * Court-fees Act, 1870, section 7 clause ix, bare Act PDF at indiacode.nic.in/ | ||
| + | * Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit, Supreme Court of India, 4 November 1988, full text on Indian Kanoon at indiankanoon.org/ | ||
| + | * Shivdev Singh v. Sucha Singh, Supreme Court of India, 31 March 2000, full text on Indian Kanoon at indiankanoon.org/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||