Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | legal:maintenance-125-crpc [2026/07/22 17:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC 2026 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Reviewed on 2026-06-20 by Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** [[/ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The courtroom has spoken on this section more often than almost any other, and that is the best news for an applicant. You do not have to argue the law from scratch. Decades of Supreme Court judgments have already settled who can claim, how the figure is fixed and how to stop a wealthy spouse from stalling. This guide walks you through that settled law and the exact steps that follow from it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== One section, two names ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you searched for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Who the law lets claim ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The section protects four classes of people who cannot maintain themselves: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * a **wife**, including a divorced wife who has not remarried; | ||
| + | * a [[/ | ||
| + | * a **major child** (not a married daughter) who cannot earn because of a physical or mental disability or injury; | ||
| + | * a **father or mother** unable to support themselves. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A landmark Constitution Bench, in **Mohd. Ahmed Khan v Shah Bano Begum (1985)**, settled that this remedy cuts across personal law. A divorced Muslim woman who cannot maintain herself was held entitled to maintenance under this very section. That principle still governs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The 2024 ruling worth knowing ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Supreme Court reaffirmed the same idea in **Mohd Abdul Samad v State of Telangana, 2024 INSC 506**, decided on 10 July 2024. Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih held that a divorced Muslim woman may seek maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The two remedies coexist; she may choose either or both, though she cannot be paid twice for the same period. If your right is being denied on a personal-law argument, this is the precedent to cite. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== How a Magistrate fixes the figure ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is **no fixed percentage** in the statute. The court weighs your reasonable needs, the standard of living during the marriage, your own income if any, and the other side's income, assets and genuine liabilities. The guiding voice here is **Shamima Farooqui v Shahid Khan (2015)**, where the Supreme Court warned that maintenance must be realistic and not meagre, so that the claimant can live with the dignity she knew in the matrimonial home. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You may read that some courts award around a quarter of the paying spouse' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The disclosure rule that levels the field ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The single most useful judgment for an ordinary applicant is **Rajnesh v Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324**. The Supreme Court found that maintenance hearings were turning into guesswork, with one side exaggerating and the other concealing. It therefore directed that **both parties file a uniform Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities**. File yours honestly and in full; an incomplete affidavit delays your own case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== File early: the date that protects you ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rajnesh v Neha also fixed a rule that rewards prompt action. **Maintenance runs from the date of your application**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step by step ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Gather proof: marriage or birth records, evidence of the other side's income (salary slips, bank entries, business records) and proof of your own need. | ||
| + | - Draft the petition under Section 125 CrPC / Section 144 BNSS, with a [[/ | ||
| + | - Attach your **Affidavit of Disclosure** in the Rajnesh v Neha format. | ||
| + | - File before the first-class Magistrate, or the Family Court where one exists, in the district where you or the respondent lives or last lived together. | ||
| + | - Press for an early interim order; note that the clock for arrears starts the day you file. | ||
| + | - If the order is passed but the money does not come, return to the same court for recovery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Figure: step-by-step flow. If a step stalls, use the grievance or RTI route shown.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== If you get stuck ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An order in your favour is only half the battle. If the respondent will not pay, the same section lets the Magistrate issue a **warrant to recover the amount** by attaching and selling movable property, and can order imprisonment of up to one month for each month of default until payment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If your application is **rejected** or the amount is far too low, you have a remedy: file a **Criminal Revision** before the Sessions Court or High Court. If the case is simply not moving, track it through [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== A word before you serve any letter ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sometimes a clear demand brings payment without litigation. A properly drafted [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can a working wife still claim maintenance? | ||
| + | Yes. Earning does not by itself bar a claim. The court compares your income with what you reasonably need to live as you did in the marriage. If your [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== From which date is maintenance payable? ==== | ||
| + | From the date you file the application. The Supreme Court in Rajnesh v Neha made this the rule, so a spouse cannot benefit by delaying the hearing. File early to protect your arrears. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Do I have to file an income affidavit? ==== | ||
| + | Yes. Both sides must file a uniform Affidavit of Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities under the Rajnesh v Neha directions. Fill it honestly and completely, because gaps in your own affidavit can stall your case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can parents claim maintenance from children? ==== | ||
| + | Yes. A [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can a divorced Muslim woman use Section 125? ==== | ||
| + | Yes. From Shah Bano in 1985 to Mohd Abdul Samad in 2024, the Supreme Court has held that a divorced Muslim woman may claim under this section, in addition to her rights under the 1986 Act, though not double payment for the same period. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if the husband refuses to pay the ordered amount? ==== | ||
| + | The Magistrate can issue a warrant to recover the money by selling his movable property and can order imprisonment of up to one month for each month of default. Go back to the same court that passed the order to begin recovery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== My maintenance plea was rejected. What now? ==== | ||
| + | You can file a Criminal Revision before the Sessions Court or High Court against the order. If money is the obstacle, NALSA legal aid can provide a lawyer free of cost. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | * https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||