Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | income-tax-refund-notice-e-nivaran-cpgrams-india [2026/07/22 17:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Income-tax refund pending or notice received? Citizen guide 2026 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** ITR refund stuck or got a tax notice? 30-min action plan, e-Nivaran, CPGRAMS, CPC Bengaluru, AO and faceless-appeal walkthrough for India 2026. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Quick answer.** If your ITR refund is still pending after the return has been processed, or you have received an intimation under **§143(1)**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Short on time? Jump to the [[#first 30 minutes the citizen action plan|first 30-minute action plan]] or the [[#the six tier complaint ladder|six-tier ladder]].// | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you opened this page because the bank account in your ITR has not been credited, or because a demand of a few thousand rupees has suddenly appeared on the e-Filing dashboard, the section you actually need is the **action plan** below; everything else is supporting context that you can read in any order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this guide exists ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every monsoon, the Income-tax Department processes roughly 7 crore returns, and a sizeable fraction get held up: refund stuck after processing, refund failed at bank validation, demand raised on a 26AS mismatch, scrutiny picked up by the **CASS** (Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection) system, or a defective-return flag fired by the e-Filing portal. The citizen-side path is well-defined but not well-advertised. This page sets it out in plain Indian English with statutory citations, sample text you can copy, and the exact category names you need to pick inside e-Nivaran and CPGRAMS. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The guide assumes no prior tax knowledge. If a section is more than you need, skip it and move to the action plan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Real-world scenario the page is built around ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box 90%> | ||
| + | **Case study (anonymised).** A salaried filer in Pune, **[Name]**, filed ITR-1 in late July for assessment year 2025-26 claiming a refund of **Rs 38,420**. The return was processed on 11 September with a notice of intimation under **§143(1)**. The intimation showed **no refund and no demand**. Two months later, on a routine e-Filing login, the dashboard showed a **demand of Rs 14,260** raised "as per CPC computation" | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The case is representative. The headline lesson is that the dashboard demand and the refund adjustment can both happen without a clean paper trail reaching the taxpayer, and the rescue is procedural, not political. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== First 30 minutes, the citizen action plan ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Set a timer for 30 minutes. Do these eight things in order before you do anything else. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Log in to the e-Filing portal** at [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Go to e-File > Income Tax Returns > View Filed Returns**. Open the latest assessment year. Note the **status**: " | ||
| + | - **Download the intimation under §143(1)** as a PDF. The password is your **PAN in lowercase followed by your date of birth as DDMMYYYY** (for example, abcde1234f01011990). | ||
| + | - **Open the §143(1) PDF and look at the two columns**: "As provided by taxpayer in return of income" | ||
| + | - **Pull Form 26AS** from e-Filing > Services > View Form 26AS. Cross-check every TDS row against your Form 16/16A. Note any **employer or deductor whose deposit is short or missing**. | ||
| + | - **Pull the AIS and TIS** from e-Filing > Services > Annual Information Statement. AIS is the granular feed; TIS is the summarised " | ||
| + | - **Screenshot everything**: | ||
| + | - **Open e-Nivaran** at [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you complete those eight steps you will already have the entire evidence pack needed for any complaint, appeal or rectification you might file in the next 90 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The twelve most common reasons your refund or demand looks wrong ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each item below pairs the symptom with the statutory hook and the correct counter-move. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 1. Refund failure due to bank-account validation mismatch ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Refund " | ||
| + | **Cause.** The name on the bank account does not match the name on PAN, or the IFSC has changed after a bank merger, or the account is not pre-validated and EVC-enabled. | ||
| + | **Counter.** Under **Profile > My Bank Account**, add or revalidate the correct account; mark it as **nominated for refund**. Then file an e-Nivaran under **Refund > Refund Reissue Request**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 2. Refund adjusted against an old demand under §245 ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Refund determined in the §143(1) PDF, but a different (smaller) amount or nothing is actually credited. Dashboard shows an " | ||
| + | **Cause.** CPC has invoked **§245** of the Income-tax Act 1961, which permits set-off of refund against any sum payable. | ||
| + | **Counter.** §245 is **conditional**. CPC is required to issue a **prior intimation in writing** and give you **30 days to object**. If you can show that no such intimation was served, the adjustment is procedurally bad. File an e-Nivaran under **CPC > §245 Adjustment** quoting the assessment-year numbers and asking for a copy of the §245 intimation. If the underlying demand itself is wrong, file a **§154 rectification** in parallel. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 3. Defective return under §139(9) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Status shows " | ||
| + | **Cause.** Common defects: tax payable shown but challan not paid, books not maintained but P&L claimed, audit-report mismatch, salary-head box left blank, or ITR-1 used where ITR-2 was required. | ||
| + | **Counter.** Under e-File > Response to Notice u/s 139(9), accept or disagree, and **upload a corrected JSON of the return**. Missing the 15-day window converts the return to **invalid** under §139(9) proviso, which means it is treated as if you never filed; reopen via **§119(2)(b) condonation** if the window has lapsed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 4. §143(1) intimation shows tax demand because of 26AS or Form 16 mismatch ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Demand line says "Tax payable as per §143(1)" | ||
| + | **Cause.** TDS claimed in the return is higher than what is reflected in 26AS at the time of processing. | ||
| + | **Counter.** If 26AS has since been corrected, file a **§154 rectification** under "Tax credit mismatch correction" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 5. Employer did not deposit TDS even though it was deducted from your salary ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Form 16 shows TDS of Rs X; Form 26AS shows Rs Y where Y is less than X. | ||
| + | **Cause.** Employer deducted but did not remit, or filed Form 24Q late, or quoted wrong PAN. | ||
| + | **Counter.** This is a violation of **§200** and **§206** of the Income-tax Act 1961, and the employer is liable for interest under **§201(1A)**. Citizen route: file a complaint with the **CIT-TDS** of your range at [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 6. HRA, §80C or §80D disallowed despite proof ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Intimation shows lower deduction than what you claimed. | ||
| + | **Cause.** Mismatch between return entry and information visible in AIS, or claim crossed pre-set thresholds (rent above Rs 1 lakh annually without landlord PAN, mediclaim above Rs 25, | ||
| + | **Counter.** File a **§154 rectification** with rent receipts, PAN of landlord (mandatory if annual rent exceeds Rs 1 lakh), 80C investment proofs and 80D mediclaim receipts attached. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 7. Salary income classified under the wrong head ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Salary reported but CPC classified part as "Other Sources" | ||
| + | **Cause.** Mismatch between Form 16 issued by employer and the AIS feed from the same employer, or contractual payment treated as Section 194J. | ||
| + | **Counter.** Rectification under §154; if the underlying Form 16/26AS is the problem, raise a deductor-level complaint via TRACES. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 8. Capital-gains computation error ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** STCG or LTCG figure in intimation is different from your computation. | ||
| + | **Cause.** Broker statement mismatch (STT, indexation, grandfathering for pre-31-Jan-2018 equity). | ||
| + | **Counter.** §154 rectification with the broker' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 9. Schedule FA, foreign-asset disclosure flagged ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Scrutiny under §143(2) or reassessment under §148 referencing Schedule FA omissions or RSU/ESOP grants. | ||
| + | **Cause.** Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act 2015 imposes a flat 30 percent plus penalty on undisclosed foreign assets; even a forgotten employer-stock vest can trigger this. | ||
| + | **Counter.** File a comprehensive response on the **e-Proceedings tab** with broker statements, vest schedules and FMV calculations. Consider professional help here; the Black Money Act is not the place to wing it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 10. Reassessment notice under §148 or §148A ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Notice referring to " | ||
| + | **Cause.** AIS-driven flag (property purchase, bank deposit, crypto receipt) cross-referenced against the original ITR. | ||
| + | **Counter.** First receive the **§148A(b) show-cause** and the **information annexure**; respond within the seven-day window with the bank and property paper trail. The §148A path was added by Finance Act 2021 and refined by Finance Act 2024; you have a **right to a reasoned order under §148A(d)** before any §148 notice can issue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 11. Demand still shown despite payment, CIN/challan not matched ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** You paid the demand by net banking; receipt has a CIN; portal still shows the demand outstanding. | ||
| + | **Cause.** Challan-Identification-Number not posted to the assessment year because of wrong major head or wrong AY chosen at payment time. | ||
| + | **Counter.** Use **e-Pay Tax > Challan Correction** within the portal; or write to the **assessing officer** with a copy of the bank's CIN advice and ask for §154 rectification of the demand entry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 12. Refund credited to the wrong account or returned by the bank ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Symptom.** Refund " | ||
| + | **Cause.** Pre-validated account closed or KYC frozen. | ||
| + | **Counter.** Add a fresh pre-validated account, EVC-enable it, and submit a **Refund Reissue Request** under e-File > Refund Reissue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The six tier complaint ladder ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the response is not satisfactory at one tier, escalate to the next. Do not skip; the senior tier will ask for the previous reference number. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 1, e-Filing portal grievance (15-day service standard) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Path: e-Filing portal > **Grievances** > Submit Grievance. Pick **Department of Income-tax (CPC)** for return-processing issues, **AO** for assessment-stage issues, **CPC-TDS** for TDS or 26AS mismatch, **Refund Banker** for failed credits. The acknowledgement number begins with the letter **A**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 2, e-Nivaran (single-window, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Path: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 3, CPGRAMS (Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Path: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 4, jurisdictional Assessing Officer ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Find your AO under e-Filing > Profile > **Jurisdictional AO**. Write a physical letter (or upload via e-Proceedings) seeking a **personal hearing**; this matters in scrutiny, defective-return and §148 cases where the matter is not purely CPC-controlled. A parallel **§154 rectification** request can be filed online. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 5, Faceless Appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Path: e-Filing > **e-File > Income Tax Forms > File Form 35** within **30 days** of receipt of the order. The Faceless Appeal Scheme 2021 (issued under §250(6B)) routes appeals to a centrally allocated officer; no physical hearing is required and video hearing is on request. Fees range from Rs 250 to Rs 1,000 depending on assessed income. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Tier 6, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you lose at CIT(A), file **Form 36** before the ITAT within **60 days**. Fees are Rs 500 to Rs 10,000 by income slab. Tribunal benches sit in 28 cities. ITAT orders are final on facts; only a substantial question of law goes higher to the High Court under §260A. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample e-Nivaran complaint, ready to copy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Choose **Category: Income-tax > Refund / Demand**, **Sub-category: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, | ||
| + | Centralised Processing Centre, | ||
| + | Income-tax Department, Bengaluru. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: Grievance against refund adjustment under §245 / demand under §143(1) | ||
| + | Assessment Year: 2025-26 | ||
| + | PAN: ABCDE1234F | ||
| + | Acknowledgement number of return: 123456789010725 | ||
| + | Intimation reference: CPC/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. I filed my return of income for AY 2025-26 on [date] claiming a refund of Rs 38,420. | ||
| + | 2. The return was processed on [date] vide intimation under §143(1) (copy attached). | ||
| + | 3. The e-Filing dashboard now reflects an outstanding demand of Rs 14,260 for AY [year], and a corresponding adjustment under §245 against the refund determined for AY 2025-26. | ||
| + | 4. I have not received any prior intimation under §245 either by email or on the portal, as mandated by the proviso to §245 of the Income-tax Act 1961. | ||
| + | 5. On reconciliation, | ||
| + | 6. I request that: | ||
| + | (a) the §245 adjustment be reversed pending issue of a proper prior intimation and disposal of my objections, | ||
| + | (b) the refund of Rs 38,420 along with interest under §244A be released to the pre-validated bank account on file, | ||
| + | (c) the demand for AY [year] be rectified under §154 to reflect the correct TDS credit. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Documents attached: Form 16, Form 26AS (latest), §143(1) intimation, bank validation status, dashboard screenshot. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | [Name] | ||
| + | [Address] | ||
| + | [Mobile, email] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample §154 rectification request ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Path: e-Filing > **Services > Rectification > Request Type: Tax Credit Mismatch Correction**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | Rectification of intimation under §143(1) for AY 2025-26 | ||
| + | PAN: ABCDE1234F | ||
| + | Intimation reference: CPC/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The intimation has allowed TDS credit of Rs 13,000 against Form 26AS, whereas the actual TDS deducted by the employer as per Form 16 is Rs 27,000. The shortfall in 26AS is on account of non-deposit / delayed deposit by the employer, for which a parallel complaint has been filed before the CIT-TDS (acknowledgement [ ]) and on TRACES. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Without prejudice to the recovery proceedings against the deductor, the taxpayer is entitled to full credit in line with the principle that the deductee cannot be denied credit for taxes deducted by the deductor (Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd v. CIT line of authority). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Relief sought: full TDS credit of Rs 27,000, deletion of demand of Rs 14,260, release of refund of Rs 38,420 with §244A interest. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample grounds of appeal under §246A and Form 35 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For Form 35 before the faceless CIT(A); add as many grounds as apply. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | 1. The learned Assessing Officer erred in law and in fact in confirming the addition of Rs [ ] under [head], without considering the documentary evidence on record. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. The learned AO erred in not granting the full credit of TDS of Rs [ ] reflected in Form 16, contrary to the principle that credit cannot be denied where deduction is established. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. The learned AO failed to record cogent reasons for invoking §[ ] of the Income-tax Act 1961, in violation of the requirements of the Faceless Assessment Scheme 2019. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. The learned AO erred in confirming the §245 adjustment without prior intimation, in breach of the statutory pre-condition under the first proviso to §245. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. The order is bad in law, contrary to the principles of natural justice, and is liable to be quashed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Appellant prays that the order under §143(3) / §143(1) / §154 dated [ ] be set aside and the consequential refund of Rs [ ] together with interest under §244A be directed to be released. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Documents checklist ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Keep one folder per assessment year. Bare minimum: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **ITR-V acknowledgement** (signed copy or e-verification PDF). | ||
| + | * **Return JSON** as filed. | ||
| + | * **Form 16** from each employer, **Form 16A** from each deductor (bank, broker, tenant). | ||
| + | * **Form 26AS** (final, downloaded after Q4 TDS-return filing window closes around 15 June each year). | ||
| + | * **AIS** and **TIS** as on the date of intimation and as on the date of grievance filing. | ||
| + | * **Bank statements** for the financial year covering all interest credits, dividend credits and salary credits. | ||
| + | * **CIN/ | ||
| + | * **Section 80C, 80D and HRA proofs** including rent agreement, rent receipts, landlord PAN (if rent exceeds Rs 1 lakh annually), insurance premium receipts, ELSS/ | ||
| + | * **Broker P&L** and **capital-gains statement** in the broker' | ||
| + | * For salaried filers, **payslips for March of the financial year** to corroborate the Form 16 numbers. | ||
| + | * Email and SMS log of every notice received from the Department, with timestamps. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen rights, the bits the department does not advertise ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Refund interest under §244A.** If the delay in granting refund is attributable to the Department, you are entitled to interest at **0.5 percent per month** (6 percent annualised) from the first day of April of the assessment year (or from the date of payment of tax, whichever is later) to the date of grant of refund. | ||
| + | * **§245 procedural safeguard.** A prior intimation in writing and an opportunity to object within **30 days** is mandatory before any refund can be adjusted; multiple High Courts (Delhi, Bombay) have read this requirement strictly. | ||
| + | * **Stay of demand under §220(6).** Pending an appeal, you can apply to the AO for stay of demand, conventionally on payment of **20 percent of the disputed demand** (CBDT Office Memorandum dated 29 February 2016, as modified). Genuine hardship cases get full stay. | ||
| + | * **Right to reasons in faceless assessment.** Under the Faceless Assessment Scheme 2019, every addition must be supported by a **draft assessment order** with reasons, on which you have a right to respond before a final order is passed. | ||
| + | * **Right to inspect records.** Under **§132B** (for seized assets) and under the **RTI Act 2005** for assessment files older than the dispute window, you can seek inspection. Departmental practice varies; the Citizen' | ||
| + | * **Right to a real (video) hearing.** Faceless appellate proceedings under the 2021 Scheme expressly permit video hearings on request; refusal must be reasoned. | ||
| + | * **Statutory clock for intimations.** Intimation under §143(1) must be sent within **nine months** from the end of the financial year in which the return is filed; beyond that the return is deemed accepted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Special-case routes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Senior citizens (60+) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Senior citizens get a higher basic exemption (Rs 3 lakh; Rs 5 lakh for very-senior 80+). Refunds in senior-citizen cases are notionally prioritised under CBDT instructions. A senior-citizen filer can also bypass certain compliance steps: no advance-tax obligation under **§207(2)** if there is no business or professional income. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Non-resident Indians (NRIs) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | NRIs file **ITR-2** or **ITR-3** as applicable; refunds get parked in an NRO account that must be pre-validated. AIS-driven mismatches are common because of TDS at 30 percent on rent and 20 percent on listed equities for NRIs (subject to DTAA relief). Use **Form 10F** plus the Tax Residency Certificate to claim treaty benefit; without these the refund will be denied. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | HUF files ITR-2 or ITR-3 with the **karta' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Partnership firm and LLP ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ITR-5; refunds get credited to the firm's current account. AIS-feed mismatch is a frequent CPC trigger because partner remuneration and interest on capital are reported in AIS feeds. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Salaried plus freelance / consultancy combo ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use **ITR-3** (or ITR-4 if presumptive). Common defect: claiming salary deduction in ITR-4 (which is not allowed in presumptive scheme for business income). Refund delays here are almost always defect-driven; | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statutory anchors used in this guide ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Income-tax Act 1961**: §139 (return), §139(9) (defective), | ||
| + | * **Finance Act 2024** and **Finance Act 2025**: latest amendments to §112A (LTCG 12.5 percent without indexation for listed equity), §54 and §54F (capital-gains rollover caps), and revised slab rates under the new tax regime. | ||
| + | * **Faceless Assessment Scheme 2019** and **Faceless Appeal Scheme 2021**. | ||
| + | * **CBDT Office Memoranda** on §220(6) stay of demand (29 February 2016 as modified). | ||
| + | * **Citizen' | ||
| + | * **e-Filing Portal 2.0** at [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A note on parallel-RTI strategy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where the Income-tax Department is unresponsive, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== How long does a refund actually take after the ITR is processed? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Once the §143(1) intimation determines a refund, CPC issues the refund order to the State Bank of India refund banker, which credits the pre-validated account within **7 to 30 working days**. If the account is pre-validated and EVC-enabled and no §245 adjustment is in play, expect credit within **two weeks** of the intimation date. Beyond that, file an e-Nivaran under **Refund > Status / Reissue**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if my employer deducted TDS but never deposited it with the government? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your Form 26AS will show short or zero credit even though Form 16 shows a deduction. File a complaint with the **CIT-TDS** of your range and a parallel grievance on e-Nivaran under **TDS > Non-deposit by deductor**. The Department is empowered to recover from the deductor under §201; you cannot be denied credit if you have Form 16 in hand, and the Supreme Court has consistently affirmed that the burden falls on the deductor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I file rectification fully online, or do I have to visit the AO? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For intimations under §143(1) issued by CPC, file rectification online at e-Filing > **Services > Rectification**. For orders passed by a jurisdictional AO under §143(3) or §147, the rectification is filed with the AO (uploaded via e-Proceedings). The online route is the default; visit only when the AO's record is the source of the problem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is the faceless appeal route mandatory now? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes for almost all first appeals against orders of an AO. The Faceless Appeal Scheme 2021 is the standing procedure; only a narrow set of exceptions (search and seizure, international tax in specific cases) goes to a traditional CIT(A). File Form 35 within 30 days; the system allocates a faceless CIT(A) and conducts the appeal in writing with optional video hearing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What is the difference between e-Nivaran and CPGRAMS? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | e-Nivaran is the Income-tax Department' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the Department adjust my fresh refund against an old demand without telling me? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. **§245** requires a prior intimation in writing and a 30-day window to object. Adjustment without intimation has been held bad in law by the Delhi and Bombay High Courts in successive matters. If you can show non-service, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Do I have to pay any part of a disputed demand before I can appeal? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | You can appeal without payment; appeal does not by itself stay the demand. To prevent enforcement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== I missed the 30-day window to file a faceless appeal, can I still file? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, with a **condonation of delay** prayer in Form 35 setting out reasons. CIT(A) has discretion to condone delays for sufficient cause; medical, family or postal failure reasons are commonly accepted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== My intimation under §143(1) is correct, but the bank refund failed. What do I do? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pre-validate a working account under **Profile > My Bank Account**, mark it as nominated for refund, and submit a **Refund Reissue Request** at e-File > Refund Reissue. The refund will be issued afresh, usually within 30 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is there interest if my refund is delayed beyond the assessment year? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, **§244A** mandates simple interest at 0.5 percent per month on the refund amount from 1 April of the assessment year (or the date of payment of tax, whichever is later) up to the date of grant of refund. CPC computes this automatically; | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What happens if I ignore a notice under §148A? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ignoring §148A is the worst option. The AO can pass an order under §148A(d) on whatever material is on file, issue a §148 notice, and reassess income with penalty and interest. Always respond within the seven-day window, even if only to ask for an extension and the underlying information annexure. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What to do next ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If you have not yet logged in, do the 30-minute plan now. | ||
| + | * Bookmark your **e-Filing grievance acknowledgement number**; you will need it for every escalation. | ||
| + | * Read [[https:// | ||
| + | * If your matter is consumer-side (insurance refund, broker dispute, bank service failure), see [[https:// | ||
| + | * Draft your RTI in two minutes using [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Last reviewed by RTI Wiki editorial team on 2026-05-16. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||