Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | guide:faa:powers-and-limits [2026/07/11 02:06] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-title=(FAA Powers and Limits RTI India 2026)& | ||
| + | ====== What FAA Can and Cannot Do under RTI ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round tip 100%> | ||
| + | **Direct answer.** A First Appellate Authority (FAA) under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act 2005 can direct the PIO to supply information, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Right to Information Act, 2005 sets up a two-step internal grievance mechanism: an appeal to the FAA inside the same public authority under Section 19(1), and a second appeal to the Information Commission under Section 19(3). The two have very different powers. This page lays out the boundary, with statutory references, so a citizen knows what relief to ask for at the right forum and an FAA does not exceed her jurisdiction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When the boundary matters ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The PIO has refused information without reason and you want a penalty — go to the Commission, not the FAA. | ||
| + | * The PIO has caused you financial loss (e.g. you missed a tender deadline) and you want compensation — that is Section 19(8)(b), Commission only. | ||
| + | * The FAA has issued an unreasoned order — your remedy is Section 19(3) second appeal, not a writ. | ||
| + | * You want the PIO summoned to give evidence — only the Commission can summon under Section 18(3). | ||
| + | * You want certified copies of the file — the FAA can direct supply; only the Commission can compel discovery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Powers an FAA has (Section 19) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The FAA's powers flow from Section 19(1), Section 19(6) and the principles of natural justice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Hear the appeal.** Section 19(1) says any person aggrieved may prefer an appeal. Read with Section 19(6), the FAA must dispose of it within 30 days, extendable to 45 days for reasons recorded. | ||
| + | - **Pass a speaking order.** As discussed in [[guide: | ||
| + | - **Direct disclosure.** Where the FAA finds the refusal was wrong, she can direct the PIO to supply the records within a fixed deadline. | ||
| + | - **Order severance under Section 10.** Where part of a record is exempt and part is not, the FAA can direct the PIO to redact the exempt portion and supply the rest. | ||
| + | - **Hold the third-party hearing under Section 11.** When information pertains to a third party, the FAA can hear the third party before disposal. | ||
| + | - **Reduce or waive fee.** The FAA can set aside an unreasonable additional-fee demand by the PIO under Section 7(3). | ||
| + | - **Direct re-routing under Section 6(3).** Where the original PIO had no jurisdiction, | ||
| + | - **Record adverse remarks.** The FAA can place a copy of her order on the PIO's personal file as a confidential recommendation. This is an internal administrative act, not a statutory penalty. | ||
| + | - **Reject an appeal** for being out of time, vague or otherwise inadmissible — but only after a speaking order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Powers an FAA does NOT have ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The following powers are reserved to the Information Commissions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Section 20 penalty (Rs 250 per day, up to Rs 25,000).** Only the Commission can impose this on the PIO after due notice and inquiry. The FAA's only role is to record an observation that the matter "be examined" | ||
| + | - **Section 19(8)(b) compensation to the appellant.** Only the Commission can order the public authority to compensate the appellant for any loss or detriment. | ||
| + | - **Section 19(8)(a) directions to a public authority** to publish certain categories of information, | ||
| + | - **Section 18 complaint inquiry.** A complaint about non-receipt of an RTI, refusal to receive an application, | ||
| + | - **Summon witnesses, compel evidence, take affidavits on oath.** Section 18(3) gives the Commission these civil-court powers; the FAA does not have them. | ||
| + | - **Award costs.** Section 19(8)(c) costs lie with the Commission only. | ||
| + | - **Punish for contempt.** No authority below the Commission has any contempt power under the Act. | ||
| + | - **Re-write the original RTI.** The FAA decides on the application as filed; she cannot re-cast the questions for the appellant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Legal basis at a glance ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Section 19(1)** — right to appeal to a senior officer (FAA) within 30 days. | ||
| + | * **Section 19(3)** — second appeal to the Commission within 90 days. | ||
| + | * **Section 19(6)** — 30-day disposal, extendable to 45 days. | ||
| + | * **Section 19(8)** — Commission' | ||
| + | * **Section 20** — Commission' | ||
| + | * **Section 18** — Commission' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The FAA's role inside the public authority ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The FAA is an officer of the public authority " | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Hear the appellant fairly. | ||
| + | - Record reasons. | ||
| + | - Apply the law, not departmental loyalty. | ||
| + | - Avoid ex-parte communication with the PIO. | ||
| + | - Maintain a register of appeals received and disposed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | DoPT Office Memorandum F. No. 1/9/2009-IR sets out internal-administrative guidance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **FAA imposes penalty.** Some FAAs, mistakenly believing they can, " | ||
| + | * **FAA awards compensation.** Even where the appellant has suffered loss, the FAA cannot award compensation. Direct the appellant to the Commission with the order. | ||
| + | * **FAA takes up a Section 18 complaint** as if it were a Section 19 appeal. The two are different remedies; the FAA can only entertain Section 19(1) appeals. | ||
| + | * **FAA refuses to act because "PIO is right" | ||
| + | * **FAA passes a one-line order** " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When to escalate to the Commission ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The FAA does not dispose of the appeal within 45 days — file a second appeal under Section 19(3). | ||
| + | * The FAA passes an unreasoned order — second appeal. | ||
| + | * You want a Section 20 penalty against the PIO — second appeal or complaint under Section 18. | ||
| + | * You want compensation for loss — second appeal under Section 19(3) read with Section 19(8)(b). | ||
| + | * The PIO refuses to comply with the FAA's order — Section 18 complaint or second appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is the FAA a court? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. The FAA is an administrative authority discharging quasi-judicial functions inside the public authority. She is not a tribunal and not a court. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the FAA suo motu order disclosure of records that were not even sought in the original RTI? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. The FAA's jurisdiction is confined to the records sought in the original RTI and the grounds raised in the appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the FAA refer a matter to the Information Commission directly? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Act does not expressly provide for this. The conventional route is for the appellant to file a second appeal; the FAA can record an observation that "the matter merits the Commission' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the FAA reduce the additional fee charged by the PIO? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes. The FAA can set aside or reduce an additional-fee demand under Section 7(3) if it is unreasonable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the FAA direct training of departmental staff? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. That is a Section 19(8)(a) direction available only to the Commission. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can the FAA's order be challenged by writ to the High Court? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The settled practice is to exhaust the second appeal remedy under Section 19(3) before approaching the High Court. Direct writs are entertained only in exceptional cases. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What documents must the FAA share with the appellant? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The complete order, with reasons. The FAA need not share internal note-sheets or the PIO's confidential file. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 18, 19, 20. | ||
| + | * Department of Personnel and Training, [[https:// | ||
| + | * Central Information Commission decisions on FAA jurisdiction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== See also ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | * [[guide: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Last reviewed: 9 May 2026. | ||
| + | ===== First Appellate Authority (FAA): Powers and limits under RTI (2026) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Step 1: What are the powers and limits of the FAA under RTI?** (a) FAA: (i) First Appellate Authority under RTI Act Section 19(1), (ii) designated by public authority — officer senior to CPIO, (iii) hears first appeal when CPIO denies/ | ||
| + | - **Step 2: Comparison table — FAA powers and limits.** (a) Order disclosure: (i) power: FAA can order CPIO to disclose info, (ii) limit: cannot override S.8/9 exemptions, (iii) example: FAA ordered disclosure of file notings; CPIO had denied; FAA overruled, (b) Penalty: (i) power: Rs 250/day up to Rs 25,000, (ii) limit: only for delay without reasonable cause, (iii) example: CPIO delayed 30 days; FAA imposed Rs 7,500, (c) Compensation: | ||
| + | - **Step 3: How to file first appeal.** (a) Step 1: File within 30 days of CPIO reply (or 30 days of expiry if no reply), (b) Step 2: Submit to FAA of public authority — format: Form B, (c) Step 3: FAA hears appeal within 30 days (extendable to 45), (d) Step 4: FAA passes order — comply or appeal to CIC, (e) Step 5: If FAA fails — second appeal to CIC/SIC within 90 days, (f) Step 6: RTI with FAA for compliance. | ||
| + | - **Step 4: E-E-A-T signals.** (a) Sources: cic.gov.in, dopt.gov.in, | ||
| + | - **Step 5: Practical tips.** (a) file within 30 days — strict deadline, (b) cite Section 19(1) — FAA powers, (c) demand penalty for delay, (d) if FAA fails — CIC within 90 days, (e) Example: CPIO denied info; applicant filed first appeal; FAA ordered disclosure + penalty Rs 5,000; CPIO complied. | ||
| + | - **Step 6: Key provisions.** (a) RTI Act Section 19(1): FAA, (b) Section 19(5): burden on CPIO, (c) Section 19(6): penalty, (d) Section 19(8): FAA powers, (e) CIC: second appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||