guide:applicant:second-appeal:cic
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| guide:applicant:second-appeal:cic [2023/04/15 11:47] – Shrawan | guide:applicant:second-appeal:cic [2026/04/23 00:47] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{htmlmetatags> | + | {{htmlmetatags> |
| - | metatag-description=(The detailed guidelines on filing the second appeal. The document also contains | + | |
| - | }} | + | |
| - | ====== How to file Second Appeal under RTI ====== | + | |
| - | {{like> | + | |
| - | Anybody who is unhappy | + | |
| - | For issues related | + | ====== How to file a Second Appeal under RTI — a practical guide for 2026 ====== |
| - | {{:guide:applicant:second-appeal:second-appeal-rti.jpg|}} | + | {{ :social:auto:guide-applicant-second-appeal-cic.png? |
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **In one line.** A Second Appeal under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 lies before the Central Information Commission (for Union public authorities) or the State Information Commission (for State public authorities), | ||
| - | The Commission | + | **What that means in practice.** |
| + | * The Second Appeal is the last administrative remedy. What follows is a writ in the High Court under Article 226. | ||
| + | * File online at [[https:// | ||
| + | * Five documents are mandatory. Missing any one is a routine ground for return. | ||
| + | * The hearing is adversarial but short. Preparation wins. | ||
| + | * Commission orders are **binding** | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | ===== Appeal ===== | + | <div didyouknow> |
| + | **Did you know?** The ninety-day clock starts from the day the First Appellate Authority' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ===== Two sentences on why Second Appeal exists ===== | ||
| - | Section 19(1) Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case may be, in each public authority: | + | The First Appeal is decided inside the public authority that refused. The Second Appeal lifts the matter out of the public authority and puts it before a statutory Commission. That external review is the real engine of the RTI Act. |
| + | |||
| + | ===== When you can file a Second Appeal ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | You can file a Second Appeal under Section 19(3) if **any one** of the following is true. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The First Appellate Authority' | ||
| + | * The First Appellate Authority has not decided within 30 days (or 45 days, for reasons recorded in writing). | ||
| + | * The Public Information Officer demanded a fee beyond what the Rules allow, and the First Appellate Authority upheld that. | ||
| + | * The Public Information Officer' | ||
| + | |||
| + | A **direct complaint** under Section 18 lies in a different set of cases, such as where the Public Information Officer is not appointed, or where the authority refuses to even receive the application. See [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Central or State Commission — which one ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Central Information Commission** — for Union Ministries, Union Territory administrations, | ||
| + | * **State Information Commission** — for State Government departments, | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the answering public authority exists under a Central law (for example the Central Board of Secondary Education, the Employees' | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The 90-day clock — explained ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Section 19(3) gives **ninety days** from the date on which the First Appellate Authority' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If the First Appellate Authority decided and communicated the order within 30 days, the 90 days runs from the date of receipt. | ||
| + | * If the First Appellate Authority is silent at Day 30 or Day 45, the 90 days runs from that day. | ||
| + | * The Commission can condone delay beyond 90 days only on **sufficient cause**. See the proviso to Section 19(3). Condonation is discretionary, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The five documents you must attach ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - A copy of the original RTI application (Section 6) filed with the Public Information Officer. | ||
| + | - A copy of the reply (or non-reply confirmation) received from the Public Information Officer. | ||
| + | - A copy of the First Appeal (Section 19(1)) filed with the First Appellate Authority. | ||
| + | - A copy of the First Appellate Authority' | ||
| + | - A chronological index and any other documents the appellant intends to rely on. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Missing any of these is the most common return-for-defect reason. The checklist is the practical bar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== How to file — online, post, in-person ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Online (Central Information Commission) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Open [[https:// | ||
| + | * Navigate to " | ||
| + | * Register or login with your mobile number and email. | ||
| + | * Fill the prescribed Appeal Procedure Rules, 2005 format. Upload each of the five documents as a PDF, JPG, or GIF, each below 2 MB. | ||
| + | * Submit. The Commission issues a **Diary Number** on submission. Save it. | ||
| + | * Print the acknowledgement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Post (both Central and State) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Prepare four original sets and one set for your own record. | ||
| + | * Each set contains the appeal memo, the index, the chronological chart, and the five supporting documents. | ||
| + | * Send by speed post or registered post with acknowledgement due. Avoid private courier. | ||
| + | * Send one set each to the Public Information Officer and the First Appellate Authority (advance copies under the Appeal Procedure Rules). | ||
| + | * Send the original and one extra set to the Commission. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== In-person ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Submit at the receipt counter, Central Information Commission, Ground Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 during working hours. Obtain a dated receipt. | ||
| + | * For State Commissions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Timeline — from filing to order ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Day ^ Event ^ Provision ^ | ||
| + | | Day 0 | Second Appeal filed (online, post, or in person) | Section 19(3) | | ||
| + | | Day 1 to 30 | Diary number issued; Commission forwards to Public Information Officer and First Appellate Authority for parawise reply | Rule 7, Appeal Procedure Rules, 2005 | | ||
| + | | Day 30 to 180 | Hearing notice issued. Hearings scheduled in batches. | Section 19(5) | | ||
| + | | Hearing day | Oral hearing (often short). Commission may allow written submissions. | Section 19(5) | | ||
| + | | Day of order | Commission passes a reasoned order. Directions for disclosure, compliance timeline, penalty, or compensation. | Section 19(8), Section 20 | | ||
| + | | Post-order | Public authority must comply. Appeal beyond lies only by writ in the High Court. | Article 226 | | ||
| + | |||
| + | In practice, Central Information Commission disposal time has ranged from **6 months to over 12 months** in recent years. State Information Commissions vary widely; some carry pendency of two years and more. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The hearing — what to expect ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Second Appeal hearing is a tribunal-style proceeding. An Information Commissioner presides. The Public Information Officer, the First Appellate Authority, and the appellant are notified. Appearance can be in person, through an authorised representative, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **The onus is on the Public Information Officer** — Section 19(5) places the burden of proving that the denial was justified squarely on the Officer. | ||
| + | * Commission members ask short questions. Bring the file. Know the dates. | ||
| + | * The appellant may request to be heard by video conference. Most Commissions allow this, especially for applicants outside the capital. | ||
| + | * Rules of evidence are relaxed. The proceedings are summary, not trial-like. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What the Commission can order ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Section 19(8) gives the Commission wide powers. In practice, an order contains some combination of the following. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Direction to disclose** the information within a specified time, in a specified form. | ||
| + | * **Direction to appoint** a Public Information Officer or First Appellate Authority where one is missing. | ||
| + | * **Direction to publish** a class of information proactively under Section 4(1)(b). | ||
| + | * **Compensation** to the complainant for loss or other detriment, under Section 19(8)(b). | ||
| + | * **Penalty on the Public Information Officer** of **Rs 250 per day of delay**, up to **Rs 25,000**, under Section 20. The penalty is personal, not on the public authority. | ||
| + | * **Disciplinary action recommendation** against the Public Information Officer, under Section 20(2). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Commission' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Current composition and pendency — Central Information Commission ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chief Information Commissioner** — Raj Kumar Goyal, sworn in December 2025 (predecessor Heeralal Samariya demitted office 13 September 2025). | ||
| + | * **Strength** — one Chief Information Commissioner and ten Information Commissioners (full sanctioned strength, restored in December 2025 for the first time in nine years). | ||
| + | * **Pendency** — over one lakh appeals and complaints nationally in the pipeline at state and central commissions at the end of 2024-25. See [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The composition of Information Commissioners shapes hearing speed. Full strength is a rare and welcome state. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section 19 — the statutory text ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | 19. Appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (1) Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case may be, in each public authority: | ||
| Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time. | Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time. | ||
| (2) Where an appeal is preferred against an order made by a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, under section 11 to disclose third party information, | (2) Where an appeal is preferred against an order made by a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, under section 11 to disclose third party information, | ||
| - | |||
| (3) A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission: | (3) A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission: | ||
| Line 35: | Line 151: | ||
| (7) The decision of the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall be binding. | (7) The decision of the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall be binding. | ||
| - | (8) In its decision, the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, has the power to— | + | (8) In its decision, the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, has the power to — |
| + | (a) require the public authority to take any such steps as may be necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of this Act; | ||
| + | (b) require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered; | ||
| + | (c) impose any of the penalties provided under this Act; | ||
| + | (d) reject the application. | ||
| - | * require the public authority to take any such steps as may be necessary to secure compliance with the provisions of this Act, including— | ||
| - | * by providing access to information, | ||
| - | * by appointing a Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be; | ||
| - | * by publishing certain information or categories of information; | ||
| - | * by making necessary changes to its practices in relation to the maintenance, | ||
| - | * by enhancing the provision of training on the right to information for its officials; | ||
| - | * by providing it with an annual report in compliance with clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 4; | ||
| - | * require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered; | ||
| - | * impose any of the penalties provided under this Act; | ||
| - | * reject the application. | ||
| (9) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall give notice of its decision, including any right of appeal, to the complainant and the public authority. | (9) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall give notice of its decision, including any right of appeal, to the complainant and the public authority. | ||
| - | ===== How to file Second Appeal ===== | + | (10) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall decide the appeal in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed. |
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Leading decisions on Second Appeal | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Binding nature and scope of Section 19(8) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **//Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Time-bound appointment of Commissioners ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **//Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India//**, (2019) 3 SCC 255 (Supreme Court, 15 February 2019). The Court directed that vacancies in Information Commissions must be filled promptly and that the appointment process must be transparent. The judgment flows directly into any practitioner' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Scope of RTI over constitutional offices ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **//Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Fiduciary relationship — narrow reading ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **//Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal Mistry//**, (2016) 3 SCC 525. The Supreme Court narrowed the fiduciary exemption under Section 8(1)(e). A regulator-regulated relationship is not fiduciary by itself. Information from regulated banks sits squarely within the RTI framework. See [[: | ||
| - | A second appeal or a complaint can be filed electronically on [[http:// | + | ==== Public interest |
| - | ===== Guidelines to fill Second Appeal ===== | + | **// |
| - | A second appeal against the decision | + | |
| + | ==== Personal information after the DPDP Rules, 2025 ==== | ||
| - | The following documents are to be submitted along with second appeal:- | + | **Section 8(1)(j) was substituted on 14 November 2025** by Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. The public-interest override earlier embedded within clause (j) has been removed. Public interest reasoning now operates through **Section 8(2)**. Commissions deciding Second Appeals after that date must locate the override in Section 8(2) and record a reasoned finding. See [[: |
| - | - a copy of the application submitted to the Central Public Information Officer; | + | ===== Infographic — the Second Appeal flow ===== |
| - | - a copy of the reply received, if any, from the Central Public Information Officer; | + | |
| - | - a copy of the appeal made to the First Appellate Authority; | + | |
| - | - a copy of the Order received, if any, from the First Appellate Authority; | + | |
| - | - copies of other documents relied upon by the appellant and referred to in his appeal; and | + | |
| - | - an index of the documents referred to in the appeal. | + | |
| - | Kindly follow these guidelines for filling | + | < |
| + | First Appellate Authority order (or silence at Day 30 / 45) | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | Within 90 days — File Second Appeal at CIC / SIC | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | Commission issues Diary Number, notifies PIO and FAA | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | Parawise reply received from PIO and FAA | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | Hearing notice → hearing (in person / by VC / written) | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | Compliance by public authority | ||
| + | ↓ | ||
| + | If further aggrieved — writ petition in the High Court under Article 226 | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | - Fill in the above appeal/ | + | ===== Infographic — do' |
| - | - Get it typed in double space. | + | |
| - | - Get one photocopy of: | + | |
| - | - Original application under RTI with its enclosures | + | |
| - | - First appeal with its enclosures | + | |
| - | - Bank demand draft/pay slip/postal order/cash receipt used for paying filing fee of Rs.10/-and other charges | + | |
| - | - Copy of demand letter of CPIO for charges if any | + | |
| - | - Postal proof of mailing original application and first appeal | + | |
| - | - Postal AD slips/ | + | |
| - | - Decisions of CPIO and FAA if received | + | |
| - | - Arrange all papers as per index and then serially number all papers on right hand side top corner. This is one original set of second appeal/ | + | |
| - | - Prepare additional four sets as above by photocopying. | + | |
| - | - Sign each page of appeal, index and chronology chart [all five sets]. | + | |
| - | - Self attest all the photocopies by signing under the word “Attested” | + | |
| - | - Send one set by speed/regd ad/UPC post to each of CPIO and FAA and attach photocopy of proof of mailing to the original, extra copy of second appeal/ | + | |
| - | - Mail original set and one extra copy of set by registered AD to the commission at the following address: The Registrar, CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION II floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place, NEW DELHI 110066 | + | |
| - | - Avoid courier services. | + | |
| - | - Retain one set for your record and reference, with proof of mailing and AD received from CIC/ | + | |
| - | - If postal AD card is not received or acknowledgement letter is not received from CIC within 15 days of mailing, it is better to send by speed post copy of only second appeal/ | + | |
| - | Along with this Article kindly find the following in .pdf format: | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | **Do** | ||
| + | * File within 90 days. Use a calendar reminder. | ||
| + | * Attach all five documents. Index them. | ||
| + | * Number pages serially. | ||
| + | * Keep one signed set for your record. | ||
| + | * Serve advance copies on the Public Information Officer and the First Appellate Authority. | ||
| + | * Ask for penalty under Section 20 when the delay is culpable. | ||
| + | * Be ready with dates, not narratives. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | * Index of Appeal/Complaint | + | **Don' |
| - | * Chronological Chart of RTI Application | + | * File without a First Appeal |
| - | * Guidelines | + | * Send the appeal by private courier. |
| - | ===== Download | + | * Attach a narrative in place of documents. |
| - | * {{: | + | * Miss the verification step on the online appeal. |
| + | * Raise new grounds not pleaded at First Appeal | ||
| + | * Ask for information not asked for in the original RTI. | ||
| + | * Skip the Rs 10 fee-paid proof. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | ===== FAQ on Second | + | ===== Common reasons |
| - | The Central Information Commission | + | <WRAP alert> |
| + | * **Filed beyond 90 days** without a specific condonation prayer. | ||
| + | * **First Appeal not filed at all** — Section 19(3) presupposes | ||
| + | * **Verification not uploaded** — online appeals require verification under Rule 3(viii). | ||
| + | * **Documents missing** — any one of the five mandatory attachments missing. | ||
| + | * **Wrong Commission** — a Central matter filed with a State Commission, or vice versa. | ||
| + | * **Fresh questions introduced** — the Commission will not allow the scope of the original RTI to be expanded in Second | ||
| + | * **Advance copies not served** on the Public Information Officer | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | {{ : | + | ===== After the Commission's order ===== |
| - | **1. What is the format of 2nd Appeal before | + | |
| - | The Format content of 2nd Appeal | + | If the order is in your favour and the public authority does not comply, apply for **contempt |
| - | **2. In case of 2nd Appeal, how many copies need to be filed and whether advance copies have to be served to FAA and CPIO?** | + | If the order is against you, your remedy is limited. The Second |
| - | Only one copy of the appeal is to be filed with the Commission. An advance copy of the 2nd Appeal needs to be served separately on the FAA and CPIO and the declaration to this effect is to be mentioned in the index of the documents referred to in Rule 4(iii) of the said Rules. | + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== |
| - | **3. Can appeal/ | + | ==== Is there a fee for a Second Appeal? ==== |
| - | As per the CIC (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005, the appeal needs to be filed in the prescribed format as given in Appeal Procedure Rules, 2005. However, there is no format | + | **No.** The RTI Act and the Central Information Commission' |
| - | An appeal to the Commission cannot be filed through e‐mail. However, it can be filed electronically on www.cic.gov.in online but will be heard only after the receipt of the verification in original as per Rule 3(viii) of the CIC (Appeal | + | ==== Can I file a Second |
| - | **4. Can an appeal to the Central Information Commission | + | **No**, at the Central Information Commission. But you can file it online at [[https:// |
| - | An appeal to the Central Information Commission is required to be filed as per Section 19 (3) of the RTI Act against the decision of First Appellate Authority | + | ==== Can I skip the First Appeal |
| - | **5. Circumstances in which a complaint | + | **Usually no.** Section 19(3) requires |
| - | The circumstances under which a complaint can be filed directly to the Commission are enumerated in Section 18(1)(a) to Section 18(1)(f) of the RTI Act. These have been further elaborated by Hon' | + | ==== How long does a Second Appeal take? ==== |
| + | Central Information Commission disposal has ranged from **6 to 15 months** in recent years, depending on the sitting Commissioner bench and pendency. State Commissions vary from a few months to over two years. | ||
| - | **6. Can a complaint | + | ==== Can I be heard by video conference? ==== |
| - | A complaint cannot be filed through e‐mail. However, it can be filed online | + | **Yes.** Most Commissions, including the Central Information Commission, offer video conferencing. Request |
| - | **7. Can a complaint be filed if there is no reply from the CPIO/FAA?** | + | ==== What if no order is passed for a long time? ==== |
| - | A complaint can be filed to the Commission | + | Write to the Registrar of the Commission |
| - | **8. Can an appeal/ | + | ==== Can the Commission direct the PIO to pay me compensation? ==== |
| - | An appeal/ | + | **Yes.** Under Section |
| - | **9. Can an appeal/ | + | ==== Can the Commission impose a penalty on the PIO? ==== |
| - | An appeal/ | + | **Yes.** Under Section 20, the Commission |
| - | **10. Within how many days of receipt of decision of the FAA, can an appeal/ | + | ==== What happens if the public authority does not obey the Commission's order? ==== |
| - | 2nd Appeal | + | The Commission |
| - | **11. Number, size and format of attachment(s) with appeal/ | + | ==== What language is allowed? ==== |
| - | - 5 attachments [RTI application, | + | |
| - | - Every attachment should not exceed individually 2 MB in size. | + | |
| - | - PDF, JPG & GIF files can be uploaded as attachments. | + | |
| - | **12. Is compliance with Rule 3 (viii) of CIC (Appeal Procedure Rules), 2005 regarding verification by the appellant in case of online appeal mandatory? | + | The correspondence and hearing at the Commission is in **English or Hindi** at the Centre. State Commissions typically allow the Official Language |
| + | ===== Act now — drafting and filing ===== | ||
| + | <WRAP help> | ||
| + | **If you are about to file a Second Appeal:** | ||
| + | * Start from the template at [[: | ||
| + | * Compare your situation with the five triggers in "When you can file a Second Appeal" | ||
| + | * Pull the five mandatory documents into a single PDF, numbered. | ||
| + | * File online at [[https:// | ||
| + | * If the delay is chargeable, mention Section 20 penalty in the prayer. | ||
| - | It is mandatory | + | **If you are a Public Information Officer responding to a Second Appeal notice:** |
| + | * Use [[: | ||
| + | * Section 19(5) places | ||
| + | * Attend | ||
| - | **13. What should be the language of the Appeal/ | + | **If you are a First Appellate Authority whose order is under challenge:** |
| + | * Use [[: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | All correspondence to the Commission should be made either in Hindi or in English. If by any chance, the information seeker wants to send anything written in any other language, it shall be his duty to provide a translation of that text either in Hindi or in English. | + | ===== Related pages ===== |
| - | **14. What is the Format & documents required | + | |
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| - | For hearing the first appeal, the FAA can adopt the CIC (Appeal Procedure) Rules, 2005. | + | ===== Sources ===== |
| - | **15. Whether First Appeal | + | - The Right to Information Act, 2005 (Act No. 22 of 2005), Sections 7, 18, 19, 20. |
| + | - The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Act No. 24 of 2019), in force 24 October 2019. | ||
| + | - The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (Act No. 22 of 2023), Section 44(3), operational 14 November 2025. | ||
| + | - The Central Information Commission (Appeal | ||
| + | - The Right to Information Rules, 2012 (Central). | ||
| + | - //Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur//, (2011) 15 SCC 1. | ||
| + | - //Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India//, (2019) 3 SCC 255. | ||
| + | - //Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal//, (2020) 5 SCC 481. | ||
| + | - //Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal Mistry//, (2016) 3 SCC 525. | ||
| + | - // | ||
| + | - Central Information Commission — [[https:// | ||
| - | The first appeal cannot be filed through e‐mail. However, it can be filed online | + | ===== Last reviewed |
| - | **16. Can a complaint lie with the Commission merely on the ground that the website of the public authority has not uploaded disclosures suo motu under section 4(1)(b) of the Act, in view of first part of Section 18 (1)(f)?** | + | 20 April 2026, with reference to the Right to Information Act, 2005 as amended by the Right to Information |
| - | The Full Bench of the Commission has issued a directive dated 15.11.2010 under Section 19(8) (a) to the public authorities for time‐bound implementation of Section 4 obligations under the RTI Act. Any violation of this directive will be dealt with by the Commission under [[act: | + | {{tag> |
| - | ===== Website format ===== | + | |
| - | {{:guide:applicant:second-appeal: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{filelisting}} | ||
| - | ~~socialite~~ | ||
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
guide/applicant/second-appeal/cic.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
