Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| guide:applicant:fundamental-facts [2023/04/15 11:49] – Shrawan | guide:applicant:fundamental-facts [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Fundamental Facts about RTI ====== | + | {{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(RTI fundamental facts,RTI Act basics,RTI Section 3 right,RTI applicant rights, |
| - | ====== Common Terms ====== | + | metatag-description=(Fundamental facts every RTI applicant should know - Section 3 unconditional right, Section 7 timelines, Section 8 exemptions, fee structure.)}} |
| - | **Common Right to Information Terms** | + | |
| - | {{like>}} | + | |
| - | {{:good-idea-icon.png?nolink |}} | + | |
| - | This segment contains most researched topics and which are very commonly referred to at our [[http:// | + | |
| - | ---- | + | ====== Fundamental facts every RTI applicant should know ====== |
| - | {{indexmenu> | + | **Before you file your first RTI, know these 10 fundamental facts. They protect you against PIO stonewalling and form the citation arsenal you will use at every stage — from application to first appeal to second appeal to High Court writ.** |
| + | |||
| + | ===== 1. The right is unconditional (Section 3) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§3 of the RTI Act 2005**: " | ||
| + | * No reason needed. **§6(2)** expressly forbids the PIO from asking why. | ||
| + | * Citation: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2. The PIO has a duty to assist (Section 5(4)) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§5(4)**: PIO must seek assistance of any officer to compile the reply. | ||
| + | * The PIO cannot refuse on procedural grounds (vague / wrong office / not specific). | ||
| + | * Citation: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 3. Reply within 30 days (Section 7(1)) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Standard window: **30 days** from receipt. | ||
| + | * **48 hours** if life or liberty is at stake. | ||
| + | * Silence past 30 days = **deemed refusal** under §7(2). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 4. Fee is capped (Section 7(3)) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Application fee: **₹10** (most authorities), | ||
| + | * Photocopy: ₹2 per A4 page. | ||
| + | * **§7(5)** — BPL applicants pay zero. | ||
| + | * **§7(6)** — if PIO does not demand additional fee within 30 days, info MUST be supplied free. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 5. Exemptions are a CLOSED LIST (Section 8 + 9) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Only the 10 grounds in §8(1) + §9 (third-party copyright) are valid grounds for refusal. | ||
| + | * Anything else (irrelevance, | ||
| + | * **§8(2)** — even §8(1) exemptions yield to public interest. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 6. Severability is mandatory (Section 10) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§10(1)**: | ||
| + | * **§10(2)**: | ||
| + | * A blanket refusal of an entire RTI when only part is exempt is unlawful. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 7. Third-party hearing is mandatory (Section 11) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If the info pertains to a third party, PIO must serve §11 notice within 5 days. | ||
| + | * Third party has 10 days to respond. | ||
| + | * PIO must consider response before deciding. | ||
| + | * Citation: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 8. Two-stage appeal is built in (Section 19) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§19(1) First Appeal**: to FAA, within 30 days, free. | ||
| + | * **§19(3) Second Appeal**: to CIC / SIC, within 90 days, free. | ||
| + | * **§19(8)(b)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 9. Penalty + disciplinary action (Section 20) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§20(1)**: | ||
| + | * **§20(2)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 10. The DPDP Act 2023 has changed §8(1)(j) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * §44(3) of DPDP 2023 (in force 14 November 2025) deleted the proviso to §8(1)(j). | ||
| + | * Public-interest test now anchors entirely in **§8(2)**. | ||
| + | * Substantive test for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Where this fits in your citizen workflow ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Before filing** — read this page + pick a sample from [[: | ||
| + | - **Drafting** — use [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Tracking** — use [[https:// | ||
| + | - **First appeal** — use [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Second appeal** — file directly with the SIC. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citations and sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Right to Information Act, 2005** — [[:act|full annotated text]] | ||
| + | * Adesh Kumar v. UoI (Delhi HC, 2014) — irrelevance is not a ground | ||
| + | * Bhagat Singh v. CIC (Delhi HC, 2007) — §5(4) duty | ||
| + | * Girish Deshpande (2013) 1 SCC 212 — §8(1)(j) test | ||
| + | * CPIO Supreme Court v. Subhash Agarwal (2020) 5 SCC 481 — Constitution Bench | ||
| + | * DPDP Act 2023 + DPDP Rules 2025 (in force 14 Nov 2025) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 4 May 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Stuck scheme or document? Check the status first ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many RTIs are filed because a government scheme or document is delayed. Before filing, check the status directly: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | If a status is stuck beyond the official timeline, use the [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| - | [<>] | ||