Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| explanations:severability [2023/04/15 11:05] – Shrawan | explanations:severability [2026/05/05 04:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Severability ====== | + | ====== Severability |
| - | {{tag> | + | {{ : |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| + | {{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(explanations | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Download RTI Act. Prescribed. Competent Authority under RTI Act. The RTI Act, 2005. What is Information under RTI Act. * Download RTI Act. * Prescribed.)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **In one line.** **Section 10** is the rule against blanket refusal. If **part** of a record is exempt, the PIO must **redact that part and release the rest**. The PIO's order must say what was withheld and why. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **What that means in practice.** | ||
| + | * Used correctly, severability resolves most Section 8(1)(j) and 8(1)(e) disputes. | ||
| + | * A refusal of an entire mixed record without severance is itself appealable. | ||
| + | * Redaction should be minimal — only the actually exempt text, not the whole paragraph. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round help 95%> | ||
| + | **New to RTI? File your first application in ten minutes.** See [[: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed on: 20 April 2026// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| **What is severability under RTI Act** | **What is severability under RTI Act** | ||
| - | Section 10 (1) of [[act:|RTI Act]] defines that "Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information." | + | Section 10 (1) of [[:act:|RTI Act]] defines that "Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information." |
| ===== Interpretation ===== | ===== Interpretation ===== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 42: | ||
| < | < | ||
| - | Further, the [[act:|RTI Act]] states under Section 10 (2) Where access is granted to a part of the record under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall give a notice to the applicant, | + | Further, the [[:act:|RTI Act]] states under Section 10 (2) Where access is granted to a part of the record under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall give a notice to the applicant, |
| informing - | informing - | ||