Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | explanations:refund-fees [2026/07/22 17:44] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(When does the RTI Act 2005 require fee refund or zero-cost supply? Section 7(5) BPL exemption, Section 7(6) free supply if PIO delays. 2026 citizen guide.)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Refund of RTI fees — when can you claim it? ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** When does the RTI Act 2005 require fee refund or zero-cost supply? Section 7(5) BPL exemption, Section 7(6) free supply if PIO delays. 2026 citizen guide. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **The Right to Information Act, 2005 has two fee-relief mechanisms: §7(5) BPL exemption (zero application fee for Below Poverty Line applicants) and §7(6) free-supply rule (if the PIO does not demand additional fee within 30 days, all information must be supplied free of charge). This page is the full explainer.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section 7(5) — BPL exemption ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Zero application fee** for any applicant who attaches a BPL certificate (or equivalent state-issued poverty certificate, | ||
| + | * No additional fee for photocopies, | ||
| + | * The PIO **cannot demand** any fee from a verified BPL applicant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section 7(6) — free supply if PIO delays ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§7(6)**: " | ||
| + | * Plain-English: | ||
| + | * The PIO cannot retroactively charge ₹2 per page for photocopies after Day 30. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When you can claim a fee refund ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **You paid the application fee, and the PIO refused based on §8 exemption** — application fee is **NOT refundable**. The §6 fee is for processing, not for the outcome. | ||
| + | - **You paid additional fee for photocopies, | ||
| + | - **You paid additional fee, but PIO supplied less than what you paid for** — claim pro-rata refund. | ||
| + | - **PIO did not reply within 30 days, and demanded fee on Day 35** — invoke §7(6) and refuse to pay; file §19(1) First Appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== How to claim a refund ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Step 1** — write a polite letter to the PIO citing §7(5) or §7(6) and requesting refund. | ||
| + | - **Step 2** — if no response in 15 days, file §19(1) First Appeal grouping the refund issue with the underlying RTI denial. | ||
| + | - **Step 3** — at the FAA + IC level, the §19(8)(b) compensation provision can be invoked for any "loss or detriment" | ||
| + | - **Step 4** — for prolonged delay, parallel CPGRAMS at pgportal.gov.in. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Claiming refund for application fee on bad-RTI grounds** — the ₹10 application fee is not refundable just because your RTI was poorly drafted. It pays for processing. | ||
| + | * **Not invoking §7(6) when PIO delayed** — many citizens pay the additional fee on Day 40 even though the PIO had not demanded it within Day 30. You should refuse and cite §7(6). | ||
| + | * **Not claiming compensation under §19(8)(b)** — IC can award you actual costs + compensation for "loss or detriment" | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citations and sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Right to Information Act, 2005**, §7(1), §7(5), §7(6), §19(8)(b). [[:act|Full text]]. | ||
| + | * **Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI** (2019) 9 SCC 199 — IC accountability for compensation orders. | ||
| + | * State RTI Rules — fee schedule by state at [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 4 May 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||