Right to Information Wiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005.

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: RTI Wiki — The working reference for the Right to Information Act, 2005 » Common Terms » Privacy Rights of Public Servants
explanations:privacy-public-servants
Translate:

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
explanations:privacy-public-servants [2018/06/03 05:38] – [Authors] Shrawanexplanations:privacy-public-servants [2026/04/19 16:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Privacy Rights of Public Servants ====== ====== Privacy Rights of Public Servants ======
  
-Hon’ble Delhi High Court(( Vijay Prakash Vs. Union of India [AIR2010Delhi7] )) with regard to privacy rights of Public servants had observed that :+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(explanations privacy public servants rti right to information india) 
 +metatag-description=(Hon’ble Delhi High Court(( Vijay Prakash Vs. Union of India [AIR2010Delhi7] )) with regard to privacy rights of Public servants had observed that :)}}
  
-A bare consideration of the right of individuals, including public servants, to privacy would seem to suggest that privacy rights, by virtue of [[:act|Section 8(1)(j)]] whenever asserted, would have to prevail. However, that is not always the case, since the public interest element, seeps through that provision.  
  
-Thus when a member of the public requests information about a public servant, **a distinction must be made between "official" information inherent to the position and those that are not**, and therefore affect only his/her private life. This balancing task appears to be easy; but is in practice, not so, having regard to the dynamics inherent in the conflict. Though it may be justifiably stated that protection of the public servant's private or personal details as an individual, is necessary, provided that such protection does not prevent due accountability, there is a powerful counter argument that public servants must effectively waive the right to privacy in favour of transparency.+<WRAP center round info 95%> 
 +**In one line.** Public servants carry a **diluted** privacy claim. Service record, postings, pay scale, and disciplinary orders are generally disclosable — but ACRs (Annual Confidential Reports), medical records, and personal financial information retain stronger protection under Section 8(1)(j). 
 + 
 +**What that means in practice.** 
 +  * //Girish Ramchandra Deshpande// (2013) held ACRs and assets returns as exempt. 
 +  * //CPIO SC v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal// (2020) balanced judicial-accountability disclosures against personal privacy. 
 +  * The 14 November 2025 amendment to Section 8(1)(j) tightens the personal-data test further. 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +{{page>_snippets:dpdp-banner}} 
 + 
 +Hon’ble Delhi High Court(( Vijay Prakash Vs. Union of India [AIR2010Delhi7] )) with regard to [[explanations:privacy|privacy]] rights of Public servants had observed that : 
 + 
 +A bare consideration of the right of individuals, including public servants, to privacy would seem to suggest that privacy rights, by virtue of [[:act|Section 8(1)(j)]] whenever asserted, would have to prevail. However, that is not always the case, since the [[explanations:public-interest|public interest]] element, seeps through that provision.  
 + 
 +Thus when a member of the public requests [[explanations:information|information]] about a public servant, **a distinction must be made between "official" information inherent to the position and those that are not**, and therefore affect only his/her private life. This balancing task appears to be easy; but is in practice, not so, having regard to the dynamics inherent in the conflict. Though it may be justifiably stated that protection of the public servant's private or personal details as an individual, is necessary, provided that such protection does not prevent due accountability, there is a powerful counter argument that public servants must effectively waive the right to privacy in favour of transparency.
  
 Thus, if public access to the personal details such as identity particulars of public servants, i.e. details such as their dates of birth, personal identification numbers, or other personal information furnished to public agencies, is requested, the balancing exercise, necessarily dependant and evolving on case by case basis may take into account the following relevant considerations, i.e. Thus, if public access to the personal details such as identity particulars of public servants, i.e. details such as their dates of birth, personal identification numbers, or other personal information furnished to public agencies, is requested, the balancing exercise, necessarily dependant and evolving on case by case basis may take into account the following relevant considerations, i.e.
Line 17: Line 32:
 The character of protection, therefore, which is afforded to the two classes ­ public servants and private individuals, has to be viewed from this perspective. The nature of restriction on the right to privacy is therefore of a different order;  The character of protection, therefore, which is afforded to the two classes ­ public servants and private individuals, has to be viewed from this perspective. The nature of restriction on the right to privacy is therefore of a different order; 
  
-in the case of private individuals, the degree of protection afforded is greater; in the case of public servants, the degree of protection can be lower, depending on what is at stake. Therefore, if an important value in public disclosure of personal information is demonstrated, in the particular facts of a case, the protection afforded by Section 8(1)(j) may not be available; in such case, the information officer can proceed to the next step of issuing notice to the concerned public official, as a "third party" and consider his views on why there should be no disclosure. +in the case of private individuals, the degree of protection afforded is greater; in the case of public servants, the degree of protection can be lower, depending on what is at stake. Therefore, if an important value in public disclosure of personal information is demonstrated, in the particular facts of a case, the protection afforded by Section 8(1)(j) may not be available; in such case, the information officer can proceed to the next step of issuing notice to the concerned public official, as a "[[explanations:third-party|third party]]" and consider his views on why there should be no disclosure. 
  
 The onus of showing that disclosure should be made, is upon the individual asserting it; he cannot merely say that as the information relates to a public official, there is a [[explanations:public-interest|public interest]] element. Adopting such a simplistic argument would defeat the object of Section 8(1)(j); the legislative intention in carving out an exception from the normal rule requiring no "locus" by virtue of Section 6, in the case of exemptions, is explicit through the non­ obstante clause.   The onus of showing that disclosure should be made, is upon the individual asserting it; he cannot merely say that as the information relates to a public official, there is a [[explanations:public-interest|public interest]] element. Adopting such a simplistic argument would defeat the object of Section 8(1)(j); the legislative intention in carving out an exception from the normal rule requiring no "locus" by virtue of Section 6, in the case of exemptions, is explicit through the non­ obstante clause.  
Line 23: Line 38:
 The article on [[explanations:privacy|What is Privacy under RTI]] may also be read. The article on [[explanations:privacy|What is Privacy under RTI]] may also be read.
  
-==== More Common terms under RTI ==== +===== More Common terms under RTI =====
 {{indexmenu>:explanations#1}} {{indexmenu>:explanations#1}}
 ~~socialite~~ ~~socialite~~
 +
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[explanations:investigation-under-rti|Investigation/Inquiry reports under RTI]].
 +  * [[explanations:vicarious-liability|Vicarious Liability]].
 +  * [[explanations:composite-petition|Composite Petition under RTI Act]].
 +  * [[explanations:substantially-financed|Substantially Financed]].
 +  * [[explanations:privacy|What is Privacy under RTI]].
 +
 +{{tag>rti explanations}}
 +
Was this page helpful?
explanations/privacy-public-servants.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1