Right to Information Wiki

Encyclopedia on RTI for everyone
You will find the Guide to Online RTI.

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: RTI Wiki » Common Terms » Justification for Denial of Information is mandatory
explanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
explanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti [2018/06/03 05:37] – [Authors] Shrawanexplanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti [2023/04/15 10:58] (current) – Shrawan
Line 2: Line 2:
 {{like>}} {{tag>CIC,denial of information, decisions,}} {{like>}} {{tag>CIC,denial of information, decisions,}}
 ===== Central Information Commission Decisions ===== ===== Central Information Commission Decisions =====
-<html> +
-<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> +
-<ins class="adsbygoogle" +
-     style="display:block; text-align:center;" +
-     data-ad-layout="in-article" +
-     data-ad-format="fluid" +
-     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443" +
-     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins> +
-<script> +
-     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); +
-</script> +
-</html>+
  
   - Quoting provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act ad libitum to deny the information requested for, by CPIOs/Appellate Authorities without giving any justification or grounds as to how these provisions are applicable is simply unacceptable and clearly amounts to malafide denial of legitimate information attracting penalties under section 20(1) of the Act.(({{ :explanations:decision_07072006_1.pdf |CIC/OK/A/2006/00163 dated 7 July, 2006}}))   - Quoting provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act ad libitum to deny the information requested for, by CPIOs/Appellate Authorities without giving any justification or grounds as to how these provisions are applicable is simply unacceptable and clearly amounts to malafide denial of legitimate information attracting penalties under section 20(1) of the Act.(({{ :explanations:decision_07072006_1.pdf |CIC/OK/A/2006/00163 dated 7 July, 2006}}))
Line 20: Line 9:
  
 ===== Court Decisions ===== ===== Court Decisions =====
-<html> +
-<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> +
-<ins class="adsbygoogle" +
-     style="display:block; text-align:center;" +
-     data-ad-layout="in-article" +
-     data-ad-format="fluid" +
-     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443" +
-     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins> +
-<script> +
-     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); +
-</script> +
-</html>+
  
   - “6. This Court is inclined to concur with the view expressed by the CIC that in W.P. (Civil) 12428/2009 order to deny the information under the RTI Act the authority concerned would have to show a justification with reference to one of the specific clauses under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act. In the instant case ………….”(({{ :explanations:delhi_high_court.pdf |Hon’ble HIGH COURT OF DELHI in W. P.  (C) 12428/2009 & CM APPL 12874/2009 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE versus D.K.SHARMA –Judgement dated 15-12-2010}}))    - “6. This Court is inclined to concur with the view expressed by the CIC that in W.P. (Civil) 12428/2009 order to deny the information under the RTI Act the authority concerned would have to show a justification with reference to one of the specific clauses under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act. In the instant case ………….”(({{ :explanations:delhi_high_court.pdf |Hon’ble HIGH COURT OF DELHI in W. P.  (C) 12428/2009 & CM APPL 12874/2009 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE versus D.K.SHARMA –Judgement dated 15-12-2010}})) 
explanations/justification-for-denial-under-rti.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/15 10:58 by Shrawan