Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(journalists module 05, appeal strategy + lawyer workflow)&metatag-description=(RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 05: Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow. Run appeals tactically when stories depend on disclosure.)}}
+====== Module 05 — Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow ======
+{{ :social:auto:journalists-module-05.png?direct&1200 |RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course Module 05}}
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**Quick Reply:** RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 05: Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow. Run appeals tactically when stories depend on disclosure.
+</WRAP>
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**Goal:** Run appeals tactically when stories depend on disclosure.
+</WRAP>
+===== Appeal as a deadline lever =====
+Often the FIRST APPEAL is more important than the original RTI. The FAA is a senior officer who has career incentive to avoid a CIC penalty — a strong First Appeal often gets the disclosure where the PIO refused.
+**Tactical first appeal**: file even if the PIO partially complied — to push for the rest. Costs nothing (no fee for First Appeal). Adds a second lever.
+===== CIC/SIC and the 90-day Second Appeal =====
+Second Appeal is a longer game (3-12 months). Use only when:
+  - The story can wait
+  - The information is **central to the story** (not nice-to-have)
+  - The PIO/FAA refusal is so weak that CIC will likely overturn (good odds for §8(1)(d)/(j) overreach)
+A Second Appeal hearing also creates a public-interest record at the Commission — the order itself becomes citable.
+===== §20 penalty + §19(8)(b) compensation =====
+Both are journalistic levers:
+  - **§20**: PIO can be personally fined ₹250/day (per-month cap per CIC Shailesh Gandhi 19-Mar-2026). The fine itself is news.
+  - **§19(8)(b)**: applicant can claim compensation for loss caused by delay/refusal. Useful if the delay killed your story window.
+Both must be claimed in the Second Appeal pleadings — don't add them later.
+===== Lawyer brief, when needed =====
+For PSU-related RTIs, defamation-risk RTIs, or those touching the judiciary:
+  - 30-min brief with a media lawyer **before** filing the RTI is cheap insurance.
+  - Lawyer's role: sanity-check phrasing for §8 vulnerability, advise on whether the story is publishable based on RTI alone, draft Second Appeal if needed.
+  - Cost: ₹3,000-10,000 for a one-shot consult.
+===== Story-craft: writing the RTI-led piece =====
+  - Lead with the **finding**, not the RTI process. "₹47 crore in unspent CSR funds at [PSU]" — not "Following an RTI by [reporter], it was revealed that…"
+  - **Cite the RTI** in the second-or-third paragraph, with the date + PIO + ref no.
+  - **Reproduce the relevant excerpt** as an inline quote or sidebar.
+  - **Link to the full PIO reply PDF** at the bottom — readers and other journalists value sourcing.
+  - **Comment requests**: include verbatim non-response or denial.
+===== ✅ Quiz =====
+Quiz available from your [[:courses:journalists:app|course dashboard]].
+===== Next =====
+  * [[:courses:journalists:start|← Course overview]]
+  * Next: [[:courses:journalists:final]]
+//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
+{{tag>course journalists module-05}}