Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | courses:journalists:module-03 [2026/07/22 15:48] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Module 03 — §8 exemptions and how to defeat them ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 03: §8 exemptions and how to defeat them. Defeat the most-common refusals on appeal. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Goal:** Defeat the most-common refusals on appeal. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 03: §8 exemptions and how to defeat them. Defeat the most-common refusals on appeal.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== §8(1)(d) — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most-abused exemption. Defeats: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Time-bound test**: post-award records are NOT commercial confidence. Tender is over; the bidders' | ||
| + | - **Public-interest override (§8(2))**: where the contract value is large and public funds are involved, public interest demands disclosure. | ||
| + | - **Severability (§10)**: even if part is exempt (e.g. proprietary algorithms), | ||
| + | |||
| + | Precedent: *Reliance Industries v. CIC* — SC narrowed §8(1)(d) to genuinely competitive information, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== §8(1)(e) — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Defeats: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Statutory-duty test** (post-March-2026 SC in Patel): records held while doing the authority' | ||
| + | - **Two-party test**: a fiduciary relationship requires identifiable parties. Generic " | ||
| + | - **Public-interest override**: especially for regulator records (banks, audit firms, contractors). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Precedent: *RBI v. Jayantilal Mistry (2015)* — RBI cannot use §8(1)(d) or (e) to shield bank inspection reports. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== §8(1)(h) — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Defeats: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Named-FIR test** (Kerala SIC Full Bench Jan 2026): generic " | ||
| + | - **Closed-investigation rule**: once the chargesheet is filed or closure report submitted, §8(1)(h) lifts. | ||
| + | - **Public-interest override**: for systemic issues (Vyapam, NSE-co-location), | ||
| + | |||
| + | Precedent: *Khanapuram Gandaiah* — case diaries to non-parties typically refused, but with closure report disclosable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== §8(1)(j) — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most cited. Defeats: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Public-activity test**: salary, qualifications-on-appointment, | ||
| + | - **Substantial-public-interest test**: even genuinely personal data is disclosable when public interest is overwhelming. | ||
| + | - **Severability**: | ||
| + | - **DPDP Rules 2026 §4 interplay**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== §24 — " | ||
| + | |||
| + | R&AW, IB, ED, NIA, etc. listed in Schedule 2 are exempt EXCEPT for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Framing: never ask R&AW for general activity. Ask for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | The §24 proviso gives a 45-day reply window with CIC oversight. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== ✅ Quiz ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Quiz available from your [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Next ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * Next: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||