Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cibil-npa-wilful-defaulter-tag-removal [2026/08/02 01:28] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== CIBIL NPA and wilful-defaulter tag - removal guide 2026 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 100%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** First raise a written dispute on the [[/ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you are short on time, jump to [[#the 6-step removal protocol|The 6-step removal protocol]] and the [[#sample legal notice to the bank|Sample legal notice]] block. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the deep companion to [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Two different tags, two different fights ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An **NPA tag** is an accounting label - the bank flags your loan as a " | ||
| + | |||
| + | A **wilful defaulter tag** is a finding by the Bank's Identification Committee that you //had the money// or //diverted funds// and chose not to pay. Governed by the **RBI Master Direction on Treatment of Wilful Defaulters and Large Defaulters, 2024**. Shows as " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Both can be wrong, both can be cleared. The route depends on which tag and where in the procedure the bank failed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== NPA vs wilful defaulter - the critical difference ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citizens conflate the two. Legally they are different animals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Aspect ^ NPA tag ^ Wilful defaulter tag ^ | ||
| + | | Trigger | 90 days of missed EMI (RBI IRAC norms) | Bank's finding of capacity + intent (RBI Master Direction 2024) | | ||
| + | | Authority | Automatic - account-system flag | Identification Committee + Review Committee of the bank | | ||
| + | | Notice required | Demand notice under SARFAESI §13(2) (for secured loans) | Show-Cause Notice + 15-day personal hearing | | ||
| + | | CIBIL line | " | ||
| + | | Duration | Until OTS / closure or write-off | Five years from tag date, even after full repayment | | ||
| + | | Removal | Dispute on bureau + bank update post-OTS | Withdraw via Review Committee, civil suit, or writ | | ||
| + | | Borrowing impact | Score drop, new loans hard | Bar on all RBI-regulated lenders for 5 years | | ||
| + | | Hiring impact | PSU/bank jobs review it | Disqualification under most public-sector HR rules | | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why people get a wrong wilful-defaulter tag ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Three reasons account for most wrong tags in 2026. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Bank skipped the Show-Cause Notice.** A generic default letter is not a Show-Cause Notice proposing wilful classification with grounds. //Jah Developers// | ||
| + | - **Hearing held in absentia.** Hearing notice not received (wrong address, returned post). Minutes record " | ||
| + | - **NPA conflated with wilful default.** Hospital emergency, salary cut, or genuine downturn is not //intent//. The recovery cell ticked " | ||
| + | |||
| + | If any matches your case, the tag is removable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The RBI Master Direction 2024 in plain English ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The **Master Direction on Wilful Defaulters and Large Defaulters, 30 July 2024** replaced the 2015 Master Circular. Harder on lenders, friendlier to borrowers on procedure. Three things to read: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Who can be tagged (Clause 3) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The 3-step procedure (Clause 6) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Identification Committee** reviews the file and records //prima facie// reasons in writing. | ||
| + | - **Show-Cause Notice** is served on the borrower stating the specific Clause 3 ground, with a **21-day reply window**, by personal service or registered post. | ||
| + | - **Review Committee hearing** chaired by the Managing Director or Executive Director. The borrower may appear in person or by counsel. The committee passes a reasoned order. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Only after Step 3 can the tag be reported to credit bureaus and to the RBI's Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What the bank cannot do (Clause 6(c)) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Skip the Show-Cause Notice, cut the 21-day window, proceed //ex parte// without genuine attempts to serve, tag a guarantor without independent hearing, or tag a director only because they are a director. Any violation makes the tag //void ab initio// - useful phrase in the writ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The Supreme Court ruling in Jah Developers v. SBI ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In //State Bank of India v. Jah Developers Pvt. Ltd.// reported as **(2019) 6 SCC 787**, the Supreme Court considered whether a borrower facing a wilful-defaulter classification has a right to be heard by counsel and a right to challenge the Identification Committee' | ||
| + | |||
| + | - The wilful-defaulter classification carries //severe civil consequences// | ||
| + | - The borrower has a **right to be heard before the Review Committee in person and through a lawyer**, even though the proceeding is administrative. | ||
| + | - The Identification Committee' | ||
| + | - The Review Committee must pass a **reasoned order** that engages with the borrower' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every High Court writ since 2019 has applied this. Tags issued without (a) a Show-Cause Notice with the IC report attached, (b) a 21-day window, (c) a real hearing with right to counsel, and (d) a reasoned Review order - are quashed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The other big case - Kotak Mahindra Bank v. Hindustan National Glass ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Hindustan National Glass and Industries Ltd.// reported as **(2013) 7 SCC 369** is the older companion ruling. It deals with how an NPA classification is done. Two takeaways: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * NPA classification is a **factual exercise** under the IRAC norms. The bank must apply the 90-day rule honestly. It cannot back-date the NPA to a date earlier than the actual 90-day breach. | ||
| + | * If the IRAC classification is wrong on the dates or the figures, the consequential SARFAESI action and the CIBIL reporting are both bad in law. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many wrong NPA tags trace to a calendar error - the bank counts "days past due" from the original EMI date instead of post-moratorium or post-restructuring. A small early error produces a wrong NPA flag months later. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When the wilful-defaulter tag is illegal - the 7 red flags ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pull the procedure file (RTI route below) and check these seven failures. Any one is enough to win a writ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **No Show-Cause Notice on record.** The committee minutes mention a " | ||
| + | - **Show-Cause Notice mentions no specific Clause 3 ground.** It says "you have defaulted" | ||
| + | - **Less than 21 days between the notice date and the hearing date.** | ||
| + | - **Notice posted to an address you had updated in writing with the bank** (proof of address-change letter wins this). | ||
| + | - **Hearing held without you, on the assumption that you "did not respond" | ||
| + | - **Review Committee chaired by a junior official** below Executive Director rank. Master Direction 2024 requires MD or ED. | ||
| + | - **Review Committee order is a one-paragraph rubber stamp** with no engagement with your reply. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Print the checklist and walk into the branch. Half of all wrong tags collapse at branch level once a manager sees a citizen who knows the procedure. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The 6-step removal protocol ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the working sequence. Do it in this order. Do not skip. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 1: Pull every credit report on the same day ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Get CIBIL, CRIF High Mark, Equifax, and Experian reports the same day. Each bureau gives one free annual report. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CIBIL:** [[https:// | ||
| + | * **CRIF High Mark:** [[https:// | ||
| + | * **Equifax: | ||
| + | * **Experian: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A wilful-defaulter tag is //reported separately// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 2: Identify the exact line and the reporting bank ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Look for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 3: File the bureau-side dispute - on each bureau separately ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each bureau runs an online dispute mechanism under the **Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CIBIL:** Login → " | ||
| + | * **CRIF High Mark:** [[https:// | ||
| + | * **Equifax: | ||
| + | * **Experian: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each bureau has **30 days** to investigate. Keep the dispute reference number from each portal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 4: Escalate to the CIRC on cms.rbi.org.in ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the bureau rejects the dispute or stays silent past 30 days, file at the **RBI Customer Information Reporting and Resolution Centre**. The portal is [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | CIRC was strengthened in 2023 for bureau disputes bureaus refuse to fix. RBI can order the bureau to update and the bank to withdraw a wrong entry. **Rs 100 per day** of delay beyond 30 days is payable under the RBI Compensation Framework, 26 April 2024. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 5: Send a legal notice to the bank ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Run a parallel track. Send the bank a written legal notice through a lawyer or through registered post, addressed to the **Branch Manager**, **Head of Recovery / Credit Monitoring**, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Furnish the Identification Committee report. | ||
| + | * Furnish the Show-Cause Notice and proof of service. | ||
| + | * Furnish the Review Committee minutes and order. | ||
| + | * Withdraw the wilful-defaulter tag from all four bureaus and from CRILC within 15 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sample notice below. Send by Speed Post AD, keep the slip. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Step 6: File a writ petition under Article 226 ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the bank does not move in 15 days from the legal notice, file a writ petition in the High Court with territorial jurisdiction over the bank branch that tagged you. The writ asks the court to quash the wilful-defaulter tag and to direct the bank to update the bureaus. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grounds: the seven red flags above plus //Jah Developers// | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Bureau-by-bureau dispute notes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | All four bureaus run under the CIC (Regulation) Act, 2005. Screens differ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CIBIL** uses " | ||
| + | * **CRIF High Mark** accepts online or offline. | ||
| + | * **Equifax** also takes email at // | ||
| + | * **Experian** (carries CRISIL legacy retail) writes back in 30 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If two bureaus update but two refuse, file CIRC complaints **only against the refusers**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The CIRC RBI dispute mechanism ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **CIRC** is the dedicated RBI channel for credit-bureau complaints, on **cms.rbi.org.in** under " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Per the RBI Compensation Framework, 26 April 2024: bureau rectifies in 30 days; bank responds to bureau in 21 days; **Rs 100/day** payable past the prescribed period. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CIRC handles reporting issues. A //tagging// dispute still needs the Review Committee, Banking Ombudsman (for reporting deficiency), | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== After settlement (OTS) - chasing the " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most common failure in 2026. Borrower signed an **OTS**, paid in full, got the NOC, and assumed CIBIL would auto-update. It did not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Why OTS does not automatically clean CIBIL ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bank's recovery cell closes the loan. Credit-monitoring reports a monthly batch to bureaus on the 15th. If recovery does not push closure to credit-monitoring, | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== The OTS → Closed update protocol ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Get the No-Dues Certificate / NOC from the bank, on letterhead, signed by the Branch Manager and counter-signed by the Recovery Officer. | ||
| + | - Write to the bank's **Credit Monitoring Department** (not the branch) attaching the NOC and asking that the credit-bureau line be updated from " | ||
| + | - Wait 30 days. Pull the CIBIL report again. | ||
| + | - If still " | ||
| + | - If still " | ||
| + | |||
| + | OTS-to-Closed is usually a 60-90 day fight. Do not apply for a fresh loan in this window. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample legal notice to the bank ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Template. Edit the bracketed parts. Use a lawyer for high stakes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | [Your Name] | ||
| + | [Address] | ||
| + | [Date] | ||
| + | |||
| + | To, | ||
| + | The Managing Director | ||
| + | [Bank Name] | ||
| + | [Registered Office Address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cc: | ||
| + | The Executive Director (Recovery) | ||
| + | The Branch Manager, [Branch Name and Address] | ||
| + | The Chief Compliance Officer | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sub: Legal notice for unlawful classification of [Your Name] as | ||
| + | a wilful defaulter / wrongful NPA reporting in respect of | ||
| + | Loan Account No. [____________] - demand for immediate | ||
| + | withdrawal of the tag from CIBIL, CRIF, Equifax, | ||
| + | Experian, and CRILC, and for procedural records. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. I, [Your Name], aged [__], resident of [Address], am the | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. I learnt on [Date] from my Credit Information Report dated | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | [or " | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. The said classification is in violation of: | ||
| + | (a) the RBI Master Direction on Treatment of Wilful | ||
| + | | ||
| + | (b) the law laid down by the Supreme Court in | ||
| + | State Bank of India v. Jah Developers (P) Ltd., | ||
| + | | ||
| + | (c) Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and | ||
| + | (d) the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 | ||
| + | read with the RBI Compensation Framework dated | ||
| + | 26 April 2024. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Specifically, | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | (iii) failed to give me a personal hearing before the | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | [Edit to match your facts.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. I hereby call upon the Bank to, within 15 (fifteen) days | ||
| + | from receipt of this notice: | ||
| + | (a) furnish to me certified copies of (i) the Identification | ||
| + | | ||
| + | of service, (iii) the Review Committee minutes, and | ||
| + | (iv) the Review Committee' | ||
| + | (b) withdraw the wilful-defaulter / NPA tag from CIBIL, | ||
| + | CRIF High Mark, Equifax, and Experian; | ||
| + | (c) withdraw the reporting from the RBI CRILC; and | ||
| + | (d) pay compensation under the RBI Compensation Framework | ||
| + | of 26 April 2024 at Rs 100 per day from [Date] until | ||
| + | the date of correction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. Take notice that on failure of the Bank to comply within | ||
| + | the said 15 days, I shall be constrained to file a writ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | the said classification, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Your Name] | ||
| + | [Mobile] [Email] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Enclosures: | ||
| + | A. Credit Information Report dated [____]. | ||
| + | B. Loan sanction letter, EMI statement, and OTS letter | ||
| + | (if applicable). | ||
| + | C. Proof of address-update intimation to the Bank, if any. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Keep the postal AD - the dated stamp starts the 15-day clock the writ court checks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== When to file a writ in the High Court (Article 226) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Article 226 is the right forum: the bank performs a //public function// when tagging a citizen as a wilful defaulter, Articles 14 and 21 are engaged, and only the High Court can quash a classification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The writ asks for // | ||
| + | |||
| + | File in the High Court with jurisdiction over the **branch that tagged you**. Typical timeline: notice → 15 days → writ filed → listing in 2-4 weeks → counter affidavit in 4-6 weeks → final hearing in 3-9 months. Many cases settle at counter-affidavit stage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Recovery scenarios from the field (anonymised) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Scenario 1: Hospital emergency, wrong wilful tag, writ won in 90 days ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box 90%> | ||
| + | **A. K., Pune.** Teacher, Rs 38 lakh home loan. Cardiac emergency in family, 7 missed EMIs. Six months later, CIBIL flagged " | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Scenario 2: OTS settled but CIBIL stuck at " | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box 90%> | ||
| + | **R. M., Indore.** Trader, Rs 11 lakh business loan. OTS at Rs 7 lakh in March 2025. CIBIL still showed " | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Scenario 3: Business downturn, defended at Review Committee ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box 90%> | ||
| + | **S. P., Surat.** Exporter, Rs 1.2 crore working-capital loan turned NPA after a US buyer went bankrupt. Attended the Review Committee with CA and counsel, audited accounts showed entire disbursement went to inventory - no diversion. Committee accepted default was //not// wilful, downgraded to regular NPA recovery. Loan restructured. Cost: Rs 65,000 in fees. The 2024 hearing right saved a 5-year lending bar. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Using RTI on the bank to get the wilful-defaulter file ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Public-sector banks are public authorities under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Private banks are not directly covered, but the RBI is - and the RBI maintains the CRILC database. Two RTI lanes are available. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Lane 1: RTI to the public-sector bank itself ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For SBI, PNB, BoB, Canara, Union, BoI, IOB, IDBI etc., apply under §6(1) RTI Act (Rs 10 fee) to the bank's CPIO. Ask for: IC report, Show-Cause Notice with proof of service, Review Committee minutes/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cite §6(1), §6(3), §7(1) (30-day clock), §10, §19(1). The [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Lane 2: RTI to the RBI for CRILC records ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Apply to RBI's CPIO. Ask for the CRILC extract for your name/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bigger context on RTI vs other escalations is in [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Documents to keep ready before you fight ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | All four bureau reports same day; loan sanction, EMI schedule, payment receipts; every default-related bank letter in date order; postal envelopes; OTS letter and NOC; **address-change intimation** to the bank (often decisive); medical/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes citizens make ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Disputing only on CIBIL.** The other three bureaus also carry the tag. Update all four. | ||
| + | * **Skipping the legal notice and jumping straight to the writ.** The High Court asks "did you give the bank a chance to fix it?" - the legal notice answers that. | ||
| + | * **Treating the Banking Ombudsman as the right forum.** The Ombudsman cannot quash a wilful-defaulter classification. It can order compensation for service deficiency in CIBIL reporting. Use it for the // | ||
| + | * **Paying a "CIBIL repair agent" | ||
| + | * **Accepting the bank's offer to " | ||
| + | * **Filing a fresh loan application during the dispute.** Each application creates a hard enquiry and a further score drop. Wait until the line reads " | ||
| + | * **Confusing a freeze / lien on your account with a wilful-defaulter tag.** They are different. See [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What to do in the next 30 minutes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Pull all four credit reports today. Save the PDFs. | ||
| + | * Identify which line is wrong - " | ||
| + | * Note the Reporting Member (the bank) and the date of the entry. | ||
| + | * If you have an OTS, scan the No-Dues Certificate. | ||
| + | * File the bureau dispute on each bureau' | ||
| + | * Draft the legal notice tomorrow using the template above. | ||
| + | * Book a 30-minute consultation with a writ-side advocate at your State High Court if the tag is wilful-defaulter (not just NPA). The first hearing fee is usually Rs 5,000-Rs 10,000. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. Can a bank tag me wilful defaulter for missing one EMI? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No. The wilful-defaulter machinery engages only after the loan is classified NPA (90 days of missed EMI) and the outstanding is Rs 25 lakh or more. Below Rs 25 lakh, the wilful tag does not apply under the RBI Master Direction 2024. Below 90 days past due, the NPA tag itself is not valid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. I settled my loan in 2024 but CIBIL still shows " | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bank must update the line. " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. Does a wilful-defaulter tag affect my spouse or my children? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not directly. The tag attaches to the person named. Family members are not // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. Can I get a job in a PSU bank if I have a wilful-defaulter tag? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most PSU bank HR rules disqualify candidates with a current wilful-defaulter tag. After the 5-year period ends (or after the tag is withdrawn) the disqualification falls away. Some PSUs run a CIBIL check for any " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. My business is a partnership / company - can the bank tag me personally as a director? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Only if the bank shows your personal involvement in the wilful-default conduct - capacity to pay, diversion, siphoning, asset disposal, equity failure. The Master Direction 2024 specifically prohibits " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. What is CRILC and how do I get out of it? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | CRILC is the Reserve Bank's **Central Repository of Information on Large Credits**. It is the inter-bank database that every regulated lender queries before sanctioning a fresh loan. If the bank reported you to CRILC as a wilful defaulter, every bank in India can see it. Removal happens automatically when the bank withdraws the tag - the bank must notify CRILC within 7 days under the Master Direction 2024. If the bank delays, the CIRC complaint covers CRILC update too. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. The bank says it lost my Show-Cause Notice dispatch record - what now? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lack of dispatch record is a //fatal procedural failure//. The burden of proving valid service is on the bank, not on you. File an RTI for the dispatch register entry. If the bank cannot produce it, the Show-Cause Notice was never served, the hearing was a sham, and the tag is void //ab initio//. This is the strongest writ ground. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. Can I file the dispute myself or do I need a lawyer? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The bureau dispute and the CIRC complaint can be filed alone. The legal notice can be self-drafted using the template above, or via the [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Q. What if the loan was sold to an ARC before the tag? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Asset Reconstruction Company steps into the bank's shoes and must follow the same Master Direction 2024 procedure. The legal notice and writ are filed against the ARC, with the original bank impleaded as a respondent. The 2024 Master Direction explicitly binds ARCs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources and authoritative references ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A note on this article ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Last reviewed: 2026-05-15. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||