Right to Information Wiki

Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. RPO Delhi

RPO held to §4 proactive-disclosure obligation.

Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. RPO Delhi

Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. RPO Delhi (Central Information Commission, 2019-08-07) CIC/MEA/A/2019/139254 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 4, 7(1). RPO held to §4 proactive-disclosure obligation. Regional Passport Office is bound by §4(1)(b) proactive-disclosure obligations regarding service standards, fee structure and PIO/FAA contact information.

Holding

RPO held to §4 proactive-disclosure obligation.

Ratio

Regional Passport Office is bound by §4(1)(b) proactive-disclosure obligations regarding service standards, fee structure and PIO/FAA contact information. Failure to publish citizen-charter compliance attracts §20(1) consequences.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 4
  • Section 7(1)

Practitioner takeaway

Citizen Charter cited as minimum service standard; deemed refusal triggered.

Citation

  • Citation: CIC/MEA/A/2019/139254
  • Court: Central Information Commission
  • Date: 2019-08-07
  • Outcome: allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: CIC/MEA/A/2019/139254