Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Forest Rights Act records — Tripura SIC 2023,Tripura State Information Commission RTI,RTI §4,RTI §6,Tripura,FRA,forest rights,section 4(1)(b),tribal rights)&metatag-description=(FRA individual-claim and community-claim files are §4[1][b] public records.)}}
+====== Forest Rights Act records — Tripura SIC 2023 ======
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**Tripura State Information Commission** · 2023-12-14 · SIC/TR/456/2023
+</WRAP>
+//Forest Rights Act files must be proactively disclosed.//
+===== Case details =====
+^ Court | Tripura State Information Commission |
+^ Decided | 2023-12-14 |
+^ Citation | SIC/TR/456/2023 |
+^ Bench | B, h, a, t, t, a, c, h, a, r, j, e, e,  , (, S, I, C, ) |
+^ Petitioner | Tripura Adivasi Sangh |
+^ Respondent | Forest Department |
+^ RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b) |
+^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
+===== Outcome =====
+FRA individual-claim and community-claim files are §4(1)(b) public records.
+===== Ratio decidendi =====
+Records under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 — Gram Sabha resolutions, Sub-Divisional and District Level Committee minutes, title issuance — are statutory public records subject to §4(1)(b) proactive disclosure. SIC directed the Forest Department to put all FRA approvals online.
+===== Keywords =====
+Tripura, FRA, forest rights, section 4(1)(b), tribal rights
+===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
+//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
+  * [[/cases/hc-himachal-rti-forest-clearance-2020|Forest clearance records — Himachal HC]] (HC-HP 2020)
+  * [[/cases/sic-chhattisgarh-rti-tribal-welfare-2022|Tribal welfare fund records — Chhattisgarh SIC]] (SIC-CG 2022)
+  * [[/cases/bombay-hc-rti-section-24-proviso-2018|§24 proviso — corruption complaint — Bombay HC]] (HC-BOM 2018)
+  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-cbi-exempt-organization|CBI exemption under §24 — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2013)
+  * [[/cases/hc-delhi-rti-police-public-relation-2021|Police public-relation / RTI-application data — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2021)
+===== Related =====
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SIC-TR|All Tripura State Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=4|All RTI cases turning on §4]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
+  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
+  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
+  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
+  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
+  * [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/placeholder-sic-tr-2023/|External reported text →]]
+<WRAP center round alert 95%>
+**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
+</WRAP>
+~~NOCACHE~~
+//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
+{{tag>case-law court-sic-tr section-4 section-6}}

Was this helpful? — views