Right to Information Wiki
Corporator funds utilisation — Maharashtra SIC

Local-body corporator fund utilisation records are proactively disclosable under §4[1][b]. //Corporator / councillor fund utilisation is proactive-disclosure.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:sic-maharashtra-corporator-records-2019 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Corporator funds utilisation — Maharashtra SIC,Maharashtra State Information Commission RTI,RTI §4,RTI §7,corporator,local body,§4(1)(b),Maharashtra SIC,development funds)&metatag-description=(Local-body corporator fund utilisation records are proactively disclosable under §4[1][b]. //Corporator / councillor fund utilisation is proactive-disclosure.)}}
 +
 +====== Corporator funds utilisation — Maharashtra SIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Maharashtra State Information Commission** · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +**Local-body corporator fund utilisation records are proactively disclosable under §4[1][b]. //Corporator / councillor fund utilisation is proactive-disclosure.**
 +
 +//Corporator / councillor fund utilisation is proactive-disclosure material under §4(1)(b).//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Maharashtra State Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2019-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | Municipal Corporation |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b) |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Local-body corporator fund utilisation records are proactively disclosable under §4(1)(b).
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +Funds allocated to corporators, councillors, and MPs for local development are public monies. Their utilisation records fall within the mandatory disclosure categories under §4(1)(b) and must be published suo motu.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +corporator, local body, §4(1)(b), Maharashtra SIC, development funds
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/hc-manipur-rti-assembly-records-2021|Assembly proceedings and constituency-fund records — Manipur HC]] (HC-MN 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/sic-jharkhand-rti-mining-2022|Mining district-fund records — Jharkhand SIC]] (SIC-JH 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/sic-chhattisgarh-rti-tribal-welfare-2022|Tribal welfare fund records — Chhattisgarh SIC]] (SIC-CG 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-lok-sabha-mp-salary-2020|MP salary + allowances — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
 +  * [[/cases/rajasthan-hc-village-accounts-rti-2018|Village panchayat accounts — Rajasthan HC]] (HC-RAJ 2018)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SIC-MH|All Maharashtra State Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=4|All RTI cases turning on §4]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-sic-mh section-4 section-7}}