📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


cases:sic-karnataka-police-records-2021 [2026/07/11 09:16] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC,Karnataka State Information Commission RTI,RTI §7,RTI §8,RTI §24,police,Karnataka SIC,§8(1)(h),complaint status)&metatag-description=(Closure reports + complaint-status records disclosable to complainant; investigation-specific material protected. Complainant entitled to complaint-status &.)&metatag-robots=(noindex,follow)}}
 +
 +====== Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Karnataka State Information Commission** · 2021-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Complainant entitled to complaint-status & closure reports; live investigation content protected under §8(1)(h).//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Karnataka State Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2021-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | Complainant / RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | Police department |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(h) |
 +^ Outcome | Partly allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Closure reports + complaint-status records disclosable to complainant; investigation-specific material protected.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +A complainant has the right to know the status of their complaint, the final closure report, and administrative disposition records. Live investigation content (witness statements, surveillance plans) remains protected under §8(1)(h).
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +police, Karnataka SIC, §8(1)(h), complaint status
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/chief-information-commissioner-v-state-of-manipur-2011-sc|Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur]] (SC 2011)
 +  * [[/cases/sic-rajasthan-rti-ration-irregularity-2021|PDS leakage investigation — Rajasthan SIC]] (SIC-RJ 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-complaint-before-second-appeal-2014|§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide]] (CIC 2014)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-cbi-investigation-closure-2020|CBI closure reports — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
 +  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-vigilance-investigation-2015|Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2015)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SIC-KA|All Karnataka State Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=24|All RTI cases turning on §24]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-sic-ka section-7 section-8 section-24}}