no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:sc-rti-anonymous-donation-2025 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Anonymous donations to political parties — SC 2025 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Supreme Court of India** · 2025-03-08 · (2025) 4 SCC 1 · **★ Landmark** | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **Political parties remain public authorities; | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case details ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Court | Supreme Court of India | | ||
| + | ^ Decided | 2025-03-08 | | ||
| + | ^ Citation | (2025) 4 SCC 1 | | ||
| + | ^ Bench | S, a, n, j, i, v, , K, h, a, n, n, a, , C, J, ,, , R, ., , M, a, h, a, d, e, v, a, n, , J | | ||
| + | ^ Petitioner | Common Cause | | ||
| + | ^ Respondent | Union of India | | ||
| + | ^ RTI Act sections | §2(h) | | ||
| + | ^ Outcome | Applicant allowed | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Outcome ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Political parties remain public authorities; | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio decidendi ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Following the February 2024 strike-down of the Electoral Bonds Scheme, the anonymity protection disappeared. Recognized national and state political parties, being §2(h) public authorities per the 2013 CIC Full Bench, must now disclose donor records under §4(1)(b) read with Section 29C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 for donations above the threshold. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Keywords ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | political parties, section 2(h), Electoral Bonds, donations, RPA 1951 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]] | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round alert 95%> | ||
| + | **Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | //Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||