Right to Information Wiki

Namit Sharma v. Union of India

ICs are quasi-judicial; orders must be reasoned. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.

Namit Sharma v. Union of India

Namit Sharma v. Union of India (Supreme Court of India, 2013-09-13) (2013) 1 SCC 745 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 19. ICs are quasi-judicial; orders must be reasoned. Information Commissions perform a quasi-judicial function.

Holding

ICs are quasi-judicial; orders must be reasoned.

Ratio

Information Commissions perform a quasi-judicial function. Orders under §19(8) must be reasoned and reflect application of mind on each issue raised. Composition of ICs subsequently modified in Union of India v. Namit Sharma (2014).

Section(s) applied

  • Section 19
  • Sub-section 19(8)

Practitioner takeaway

IC adjudication standards; reasoned orders mandatory under §19(8).

Citation

  • Citation: (2013) 1 SCC 745
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Date: 2013-09-13
  • Outcome: disposed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: (2013) 1 SCC 745