no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:hc-bombay-rti-ulb-property-tax-2024 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Municipal property-tax records — Bombay HC 2024 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Bombay High Court** · 2024-03-28 · 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1123 | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **Ward-wise property-tax revenue aggregates are §4[1][b]; individual owner billing requires §11. Municipal revenue aggregates are open; individual tax bills are.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Municipal revenue aggregates are open; individual tax bills are §11-gated.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case details ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Court | Bombay High Court | | ||
| + | ^ Decided | 2024-03-28 | | ||
| + | ^ Citation | 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1123 | | ||
| + | ^ Bench | G, ., S, ., , K, u, l, k, a, r, n, i, ,, , J, i, t, e, n, d, r, a, , J, a, i, n, , J, J | | ||
| + | ^ Petitioner | Mumbai Citizens Forum | | ||
| + | ^ Respondent | BMC | | ||
| + | ^ RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b), §8(1)(j) | | ||
| + | ^ Outcome | partly allowed | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Outcome ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ward-wise property-tax revenue aggregates are §4(1)(b); individual owner billing requires §11. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio decidendi ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ward-wise, category-wise property-tax collection data of a Municipal Corporation is public-finance information falling within §4(1)(b)(xi). Individual property-owner billing attracts §8(1)(j) and §11 third-party process. Defaulter lists above a notified threshold have been held disclosable as public interest. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Keywords ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | BMC, property tax, section 4(1)(b), section 11, municipal revenue | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]] | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round alert 95%> | ||
| + | **Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | //Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||