Right to Information Wiki
Board-examination records — Delhi HC

Post-Aditya Bandopadhyay, board-exam evaluated answer scripts are disclosable on payment of copy fees. Board-exam answer scripts disclosable per Aditya.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:delhi-hc-rti-union-board-examinations-2019 [2026/05/03 08:28] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Board-examination records — Delhi HC,High Court of Delhi RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,board exams,CBSE,Delhi HC,Aditya Bandopadhyay)&metatag-description=(Post-Aditya Bandopadhyay, board-exam evaluated answer scripts are disclosable on payment of copy fees. Board-exam answer scripts disclosable per Aditya.)}}
 +
 +====== Board-examination records — Delhi HC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**High Court of Delhi** · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Board-exam answer scripts disclosable per //Aditya Bandopadhyay// (SC 2011); PIO cannot delay on administrative grounds.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | High Court of Delhi |
 +^ Decided | 2019-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | Student / RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | CBSE / ICSE / State Board |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §2(f) |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Post-Aditya Bandopadhyay, board-exam evaluated answer scripts are disclosable on payment of copy fees.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +Following //Aditya Bandopadhyay//, class 10 and 12 board-exam answer scripts are disclosable under RTI on payment of reasonable copy fees. PIOs cannot delay on grounds of 'administrative load' or 'internal process'; §7(1) 30-day timeline strictly applies.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +board exams, CBSE, Delhi HC, Aditya Bandopadhyay
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/cbse-v-paresh-ghadge-cic|Open-evaluation regime post-Aditya Bandopadhyay — CIC directives]] (CIC 2012)
 +  * [[/important-decisions/cbse-and-anr-vs-aditya-bandopadhyay|CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay]] (SC 2011)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-recruitment-answer-keys-2020|Answer keys of recruitment exams — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-calcutta-rti-teacher-recruitment-2022|School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC]] (HC-CAL 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-procedural-fee-calculation-2019|Excessive fee calculation — §7(3) — CIC]] (CIC 2019)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=HC-DEL|All High Court of Delhi rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-hc-del section-2 section-8}}