Right to Information Wiki
§11 third-party cost-bearing — CIC

Cost of §11 third-party notice borne by the public authority — not passed on to the applicant. §11 third-party notice cost = public authority's cost; cannot be.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-rti-third-party-fee-bearing-2019 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(§11 third-party cost-bearing — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §11,§11,cost,CIC,fee)&metatag-description=(Cost of §11 third-party notice borne by the public authority — not passed on to the applicant. §11 third-party notice cost = public authority's cost; cannot be.)}}
 +
 +====== §11 third-party cost-bearing — CIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +**Cost of §11 third-party notice borne by the public authority — not passed on to the applicant. §11 third-party notice cost = public authority's cost; cannot be.**
 +
 +//§11 third-party notice cost = public authority's cost; cannot be charged to applicant.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2019-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | PIO |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §11 |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Cost of §11 third-party notice borne by the public authority — not passed on to the applicant.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +The cost of issuing a §11 third-party notice — postage, registered mail, any translation — is part of the public authority's statutory disclosure cost. It cannot be added to the applicant's copy-fee or §7(3) intimation.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +§11, cost, CIC, fee
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/muniyappan-third-party-cic|Muniyappan standard — §11 third-party notice]] (CIC 2010)
 +  * [[/important-decisions/court/right-to-information-applications-for-gujarat-high-court-pleadings-cannot-be-filed-by-a-third-party|Gujarat HC pleadings — third-party RTI not maintainable]] (HC-GUJ 2019)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-procedural-fee-calculation-2019|Excessive fee calculation — §7(3) — CIC]] (CIC 2019)
 +  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-private-contract-with-govt-2019|Private contractor records with govt — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2019)
 +  * [[/cases/sc-rti-section-7-3-fee-intimation-2021|§7(3) fee-intimation procedure — SC clarity]] (SC 2021)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=11|All RTI cases turning on §11]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-11}}