Right to Information Wiki
Statutory boards under RTI — CIC

FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB are statutory / State-anchored public authorities; records disclosable under RTI. FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB: §2(h) public authorities;.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


cases:cic-rti-statutory-boards-2023 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Statutory boards under RTI — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,FSSAI,APEDA,NABARD,AIIB,§2(h))&metatag-description=(FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB are statutory / State-anchored public authorities; records disclosable under RTI. FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB: §2(h) public authorities;.)}}
 +
 +====== Statutory boards under RTI — CIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2023-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +**FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB are statutory / State-anchored public authorities; records disclosable under RTI. FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB: §2(h) public authorities;.**
 +
 +//FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB: §2(h) public authorities; regulatory records disclosable under RTI.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2023-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | RTI applicants |
 +^ Respondent | Various statutory boards |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §2(h) |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB are statutory / State-anchored public authorities; records disclosable under RTI.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +Statutory authorities — FSSAI under the Food Safety and Standards Act, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB — are public authorities under §2(h). Their regulatory and compliance records, inspection reports, licensing decisions and annual reports are disclosable under RTI, subject to narrow §8(1)(d) commercial-confidence carve-outs for trade-secret material.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +FSSAI, APEDA, NABARD, AIIB, §2(h)
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-fssai-food-licensing-2022|FSSAI food-licensing records — CIC]] (CIC 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-inspection-records-medical-2018|Hospital inspection reports — CIC]] (CIC 2018)
 +  * [[/important-decisions/rbi-vs-jayantilal-mistry|Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry]] (SC 2015)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-rajasthan-rti-ngt-compliance-2021|NGT order compliance records — Rajasthan HC]] (HC-RAJ 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/bombay-hc-rti-medical-council-2018|RTI coverage of Medical Council — Bombay HC]] (HC-BOM 2018)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2}}