Right to Information Wiki
SEBI inspection records — CIC — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

SEBI inspection records disclosable under //Jayantilal Mistry// rationale; commercially-confidential trading data protected.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-rti-sebi-disclosure-2018 [2026/05/03 08:37] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(SEBI inspection records — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,SEBI,§8(1)(d),§8(1)(e),CIC,regulator)&metatag-description=(SEBI inspection records disclosable under //Jayantilal Mistry// rationale; commercially-confidential trading data protected.)}}
 +
 +====== SEBI inspection records — CIC — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 ======
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2018-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +**SEBI inspection records disclosable under //Jayantilal Mistry// rationale; commercially-confidential trading data protected.**
 +
 +//SEBI inspection records disclosable; commercial trading data protected under §8(1)(d).//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2018-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | SEBI |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(d), §8(1)(e) |
 +^ Outcome | Partly allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +SEBI inspection records disclosable under //Jayantilal Mistry// rationale; commercially-confidential trading data protected.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +Following the Supreme Court's rationale in //RBI v. Jayantilal Mistry// (2015), SEBI's inspection reports on regulated entities are disclosable. Pure commercial trading data (open interest positions, client identities) remains protected under §8(1)(d).
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +SEBI, §8(1)(d), §8(1)(e), CIC, regulator
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/raj-narain-inspection-of-records-cic|Inspection of records under RTI — CIC guidance]] (CIC 2013)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-inspection-records-medical-2018|Hospital inspection reports — CIC]] (CIC 2018)
 +  * [[/cases/reserve-bank-of-india-v-jayantilal-mistry-cic|Reserve Bank of India — PIO's information denial (CIC)]] (CIC 2011)
 +  * [[/important-decisions/rbi-vs-jayantilal-mistry|Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry]] (SC 2015)
 +  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-inspection-charge-2014|Inspection charges — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2014)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}