Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570 [2026/08/28 19:26] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-title=Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax — CIC 2022 | ||
| + | metatag-keywords=(Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8, | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Cca, - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India' | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax — CIC 2022 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Central Information Commission** · 2022-08-16 · CIC File No. IK/57357036 | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax.** RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case details ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Court | Central Information Commission | | ||
| + | ^ Decided | 2022-08-16 | | ||
| + | ^ Citation | CIC File No. IK/57357036 | | ||
| + | ^ Bench | CIC Single Bench | | ||
| + | ^ Petitioner | Ravinder Kaur | | ||
| + | ^ Respondent | Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax | | ||
| + | ^ RTI Act sections | §8(1) | | ||
| + | ^ Outcome | Rejected | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Outcome ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Commission dismissed the appeal | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio decidendi ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Information sought is personal in nature | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Keywords ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | chief, commissioner, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | * [[/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]] | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round alert 95%> | ||
| + | **Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | //Editorial summary · | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||