Right to Information Wiki
Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ...

Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records. Case: Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies...

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-piyush-avinash-luktuke-v-institute-of-companies-secreta-2022-511087 [2026/05/05 04:44] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,institute,of,companies,secretaries)&metatag-description=(Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records. Case: Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies...)}}
 +
 +====== Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... ======
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2022-05-09 · CIC File No. IK/5110875
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2022-05-09 |
 +^ Citation | CIC File No. IK/5110875 |
 +^ Bench | C, I, C,  , S, i, n, g, l, e,  , B, e, n, c, h |
 +^ Petitioner | Piyush Avinash Luktuke |
 +^ Respondent | Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) |
 +^ Outcome | partly allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +ICSI is §2(h); own examination marks are accessible per //Aditya Bandopadhyay//; third-party marks are §8(1)(j).
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +institute, of, companies, secretaries
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/cic-naresh-sharma-v-tata-institute-of-fundamental-2021-485463|Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-aiims-pgi-2020|AIIMS / PGI medical records — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2020)
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-psc-v-state-of-bihar-2012-sc|Bihar PSC — interview marks disclosability]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-calcutta-rti-teacher-recruitment-2022|School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC]] (HC-CAL 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-delhi-rti-upsc-interview-2024|UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024]] (HC-DEL 2024)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +  * [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/5110875/|External reported text →]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}