📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-piyush-avinash-luktuke-v-institute-of-companies-secreta-2022-511087 [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,institute,of,companies,secretaries)&metatag-description=(Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records. Case: Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies...)}}
 +
 +====== Piyush Avinash Luktuke v. Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... ======
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2022-05-09 · CIC File No. IK/5110875
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2022-05-09 |
 +^ Citation | CIC File No. IK/5110875 |
 +^ Bench | C, I, C,  , S, i, n, g, l, e,  , B, e, n, c, h |
 +^ Petitioner | Piyush Avinash Luktuke |
 +^ Respondent | Institute Of Companies Secretaries Of ... |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) |
 +^ Outcome | partly allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Dealt with an RTI to the Institute of Company Secretaries of India on examination or professional records.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +ICSI is §2(h); own examination marks are accessible per //Aditya Bandopadhyay//; third-party marks are §8(1)(j).
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +institute, of, companies, secretaries
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/cic-naresh-sharma-v-tata-institute-of-fundamental-2021-485463|Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-aiims-pgi-2020|AIIMS / PGI medical records — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2020)
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-psc-v-state-of-bihar-2012-sc|Bihar PSC — interview marks disclosability]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-calcutta-rti-teacher-recruitment-2022|School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC]] (HC-CAL 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-delhi-rti-upsc-interview-2024|UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024]] (HC-DEL 2024)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +  * [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/5110875/|External reported text →]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}