Right to Information Wiki
Judicial Academies under RTI — CIC

National and State Judicial Academies are 'public authorities' under §2[h]; training curricula and expense accounts disclosable.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-judicial-academies-2020 [2026/04/23 00:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Judicial Academies under RTI — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,judicial academy,§2(h),CIC,training)&metatag-description=(National and State Judicial Academies are 'public authorities' under §2[h]; training curricula and expense accounts disclosable.)}}
 +
 +====== Judicial Academies under RTI — CIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Judicial academies are §2(h) public authorities; curricula, faculty lists, and accounts disclosable.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2020-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | RTI applicant |
 +^ Respondent | National/State Judicial Academy |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §2(h) |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +National and State Judicial Academies are 'public authorities' under §2(h); training curricula and expense accounts disclosable.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +National and State Judicial Academies, established by the judiciary with State funding, are 'public authorities' under §2(h). Training curricula, faculty lists, research output, and annual accounts are disclosable subject to normal §8 carve-outs.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +judicial academy, §2(h), CIC, training
 +
 +===== This case cites =====
 +
 +  * [[/important-decisions/thalappalam-coop-vs-state-of-kerala|Thalappalam Service Coop Bank v. State of Kerala]] (SC 2013)
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/khanapuram-gandaiah-2010-sc|Khanapuram Gandaiah v. Administrative Officer]] (SC 2010)
 +  * [[/cases/namit-sharma-v-uoi-2012-sc|Namit Sharma v. Union of India]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/sc-rti-judicial-delay-information-2023|Judicial-delay records — SC]] (SC 2023)
 +  * [[/cases/rajasthan-hc-village-accounts-rti-2018|Village panchayat accounts — Rajasthan HC]] (HC-RAJ 2018)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-rti-iit-recruitment-2022|IIT faculty recruitment — CIC]] (CIC 2022)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2}}