Right to Information Wiki

Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

§11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.

Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO (Central Information Commission, 2008-04-20) CIC/AT/A/2008/000123 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 11. §11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground. Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party.

Holding

§11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground.

Ratio

Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party. It is not a substantive exemption. PIO cannot refuse the request outright citing §11 — must follow the consultation procedure and decide on merits.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 11

Practitioner takeaway

§11 mandates consultation; outright refusal under §11 invalid.

Citation

  • Citation: CIC/AT/A/2008/000123
  • Court: Central Information Commission
  • Date: 2008-04-20
  • Outcome: allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: CIC/AT/A/2008/000123