A subsidy that was sanctioned but never landed in your bank account has a paper trail, and the Right to Information Act 2005 gives you the power to read it. The department that owes you the money must answer in writing within 30 days under §7(1) — and once the file notings are on your table, the “system problem” excuse usually disappears.
Quick answer: File one RTI to the public authority that implements the scheme — not your bank — asking for payment status, the recorded return reason for the failed credit, Aadhaar-mapping status and action on your grievance. Fee ₹10. Reply due in 30 days under §7(1); first appeal under §19(1) after that.
It is an information request, not a complaint. Under §6(1) of the RTI Act you ask the implementing department to disclose what its own records show: whether your instalment was generated, why the credit failed, and who is sitting on the file. The reply is binding and written.
| Scheme or benefit | File your RTI to |
|---|---|
| PM-KISAN instalment | CPIO, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture (or the State Agriculture Department if land records are the hold-up) |
| LPG (PAHAL) subsidy | CPIO, Oil Marketing Company area office / Ministry of Petroleum |
| Fertiliser subsidy | CPIO, Department of Fertilisers |
| NSP scholarship | CPIO, the institute or the department running that scholarship |
| State pension / ration / housing scheme | CPIO of the district or State department implementing it |
Your bank is generally the wrong respondent — it sees a returned credit, not the scheme file. The Aakash Goel order above confirms the Commission's practice of routing citizens to the authority holding the record.
Shrawan Kumar, 46, farmer, Samastipur district, Bihar. His PM-KISAN instalment of ₹2,000 due in November 2025 never arrived; the portal showed “Pending at bank” for four months (November 2025 – February 2026). He filed a grievance on pmkisan.gov.in on 3 March 2026 — no resolution. On 12 March 2026 he sent a ₹10 IPO RTI to the CPIO, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, asking for the payment status, the recorded return reason and action on his grievance. The reply, dated 4 April 2026 (23 days), showed the credit had been returned because his Aadhaar mapping had slipped to an old account. He re-mapped through his bank's Aadhaar-seeding form; both the missed ₹2,000 and the next instalment landed on 2 May 2026. Total cost of the exercise: ₹10 and one registered post.
To, The Central Public Information Officer, [Department / Ministry / District Office implementing the scheme], [Full postal address]. Subject: Application under §6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 — status of DBT / subsidy payment Sir/Madam, Kindly provide the following information relating to beneficiary [Scheme name], beneficiary ID [number], instalment/tranche [number] for the period [dates]: 1. Present status of the payment: generated, released, returned or withheld, with the date of each action. 2. The return or rejection reason recorded for the failed credit to account [last 4 digits], bank [name]. 3. Whether the beneficiary's Aadhaar-bank mapping on the date of transfer was active, and to which bank it pointed. 4. Copies of the relevant file notings and correspondence on the delay. 5. Action taken on grievance No. [number] dated [date], with copies of the reply. 6. Name and designation of the officer responsible for releasing this instalment. Payment of Rs. 10 is made by [IPO/DD/Court-fee stamp] No. [number]. [If BPL: Copy of BPL card enclosed; fee exemption claimed under the RTI Rules.] Yours faithfully, [Name] [Full address, phone, email] [Date] [Place]
Public-sector banks are public authorities, so you can — but the scheme file sits with the department. Ask the bank only for the return reason on the specific credit; ask the department for everything else.
The recorded return reason, the exact date the money bounced, the officer's notings and the action on your grievance — the four things the portal never shows.
With the State Information Commission, within 90 days under §19(3). For central schemes it is the CIC — see State-wise RTI fees and commission details.
No. The ₹10 fee applies regardless of the instalment size; only BPL cardholders are exempt.
You are asking about your own payment — you may be asked to prove identity, not denied. For beneficiary-list data of others, the Aakash Goel order shows the Commission expects you to approach the authority holding that list.
Under §19(8)(b) the Information Commission may direct compensation for genuine loss; plead the delay and the instalment amount specifically in the second appeal.
File the first appeal on day 31 (§19(1)) and the second appeal any time in the next 90 days (§19(3)) — meanwhile keep the CPGRAMS ticket running in parallel.
The AI RTI Drafter builds this exact application from your scheme details, and the Timeline Tracker prints your appeal deadlines.
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026. Verified §4(1)(b)(xii), §7(1) and §19 timelines against the official Act text hosted by the Central Information Commission, PM-KISAN amounts and the 155261 helpline against pmkisan.gov.in and PIB releases, and the CIC ruling against the order text on Indian Kanoon.