Direct answer in 30 seconds. When your scholarship shows “approved” but money never reaches your bank, file one RTI to the scheme-owning Central ministry (or your state welfare department for state schemes) for Rs.10 through rtionline.gov.in. Ask for the institute-verification date, the District/State Nodal Officer sanction date, and the PFMS Fund Transfer Order number with UTR. Reply is due in 30 days under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act.
Anjali is a second-year B.Com student at a state-government degree college in a district headquarter town in Uttar Pradesh. She belongs to the SC category and applied for the Post-Matric Scholarship for SC Students through the National Scholarship Portal (NSP) at scholarships.gov.in. Her renewal for 2025-26 was logged in September 2025. By December, the portal showed three green ticks — Institute verified, District Nodal Officer verified, State Nodal Officer verified — and the status read “Approved”. Then nothing happened. For ten weeks her bank account stayed empty.
She did what most students do first. She called her college's scholarship cell, who told her “the file has gone to Delhi.” She called the NSP helpdesk at 0120-6619540, who told her “your application is approved, please wait for the next PFMS batch.” She waited through two batches. Still nothing. The college clerk said maybe her bank account was the problem. Her branch said everything was fine. Nobody could tell her the single sentence she needed to hear: at which exact step is my money stuck, and on what date did it get stuck there?
That sentence is what the Right to Information Act, 2005 exists to extract. A scholarship travels through at least three verification levels and one payment gateway, and each level is a different government office. When the chain breaks, only an RTI application can force each office to put its step on record. This guide shows you exactly how, using only verified facts about NSP, PFMS and the RTI Act as they stand in 2026.
A “scholarship delay” is not one problem. It is a family of problems that look identical from the student's end — money not credited — but sit at very different desks. Before filing RTI, you need to know which desk holds your file.
The National Scholarship Portal (NSP) at scholarships.gov.in is the central online doorway for dozens of Central-sector and Centrally-sponsored scholarship schemes. It is administered by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), with technical implementation by the National Informatics Centre (NIC), as a Mission Mode Project under the National e-Governance Plan. Crucially, MeitY only runs the portal. The scheme-owning ministries and departments are separate, and they are the correct “public authority” for any RTI about sanction or disbursement of a particular scheme. The main scheme owners hosted on NSP are:
The NSP portal itself states, on its RTI Contact page, that an RTI application must be addressed to the concerned nodal ministry or department of the scheme, not to the portal operator. This single rule decides where your Rs.10 application goes.
The second layer is the state welfare department. Every state runs its own post-matric, pre-matric, OBC/SC/ST and minority scholarships outside NSP, through a State Scholarship Portal or an e-Samaj portal. For those, the public authority is your state's Social Welfare / SC/ST/OBC Welfare / Minority Welfare / Backward Classes Welfare department (the exact title varies by state). State-scheme RTI goes to that department's PIO, not to any Central ministry.
The third layer is the Public Financial Management System (PFMS), run by the Office of the Controller General of Accounts (CGA) in the Ministry of Finance. Every NSP disbursement is paid out as a Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) through PFMS. PFMS is the official payment trail — it knows when a Fund Transfer Order (FTO) was raised, whether the bank accepted it, and the Unique Transaction Reference (UTR) that confirms the credit actually landed.
Why this matters for your RTI. The portal showing “Approved” only means the three verification levels have said yes. It says nothing about whether PFMS has raised an FTO, whether your bank pre-validation passed, or whether the credit was rejected and silently queued for the next batch. Your RTI must ask all three layers, or the PIO will answer only the layer that suits him.
A scholarship application on NSP moves through a three-level verification chain, and the money moves through a separate payment chain. The delay can sit in either chain.
The verification chain:
The payment chain:
Aadhaar is mandatory for the One Time Registration (OTR) and for DBT on NSP. Your bank account must be Aadhaar-seeded and pre-validated, meaning the name on the bank account must match the name on Aadhaar and the account must be mapped correctly in the NPCI Aadhaar-bank mapper. A single failed pre-validation is the silent cause of a large share of “approved but unpaid” cases.
The most useful public-facing tool for the payment chain is the PFMS “Track NSP Payments” page at https://pfms.nic.in/SitePages/TrackNSPpayments.aspx. You can search by your NSP Application ID, or by bank name plus account number, and see whether an FTO has been generated and whether the bank credit is “Pending”, “Success” or “Rejected”. Run this check before you file RTI — it often tells you which layer to target.
Two things have changed in the scholarship-RTI landscape that you should use in 2026.
First, the NSP portal now hosts a “Know Nodal Ministry/Department of an Application” tool under its Services section, at https://nsp.gov.in/NSPADMIN/RTIContact. You enter your application ID and the tool tells you, scheme by scheme, which ministry or department is the correct RTI addressee for your specific application. This removes the most common mistake students make — filing RTI to MeitY or to the wrong ministry and losing 5 days to a Section 6(3) transfer. Use this tool, then file directly to the ministry it names.
Second, the Central RTI online portal (rtionline.gov.in) now serves almost every scheme-owning Central ministry, so a single online application with a Rs.10 e-payment reaches the right CPIO without a postal delay. The fee is paid by debit/credit card, UPI or net banking. You receive a registration number immediately, which is your proof of submission.
For state welfare scholarships, most states now run their own online RTI portals as well. The fee and format vary by state RTI Rules — most states charge Rs.10, but some charge nothing for BPL applicants and a few have different slabs. Check your state's RTI Rules before filing; the RTI Fees by State and Online Portal Directory (2026) page summarises the common ones.
What does this mean for Anjali? She no longer has to guess which desk in Delhi holds her file, and she no longer has to print and post a letter. She can identify the ministry in two minutes on the NSP RTI Contact page, file online for Rs.10, and force a dated reply within 30 days.
You will usually file one application to the scheme-owning Central ministry, or to your state welfare department for state schemes. In stubborn cases you file a second application in parallel to your college's CPIO (for the institute-verification layer), because that layer is held by the institute, not the ministry.
Step 1 — Identify the public authority.
Step 2 — Gather your identifiers. Before drafting, keep these ready: NSP Application ID, scheme name, academic year, institute name and AISHE/DISE code, Aadhaar last 4 digits, bank account last 4 digits, and the date you applied. Without the NSP Application ID, the PIO cannot locate your file and will reply with “information not identifiable”.
Step 3 — Prepare your questions. Ask for specific, dated records, not vague “status”. Six strong questions:
Step 4 — Use the right form and fee.
Step 5 — Submit and keep proof. File online through rtionline.gov.in and save the registration number, or send by registered post and keep the acknowledgement, or file by hand and take a stamped receiving copy. Proof of submission is your protection if the reply is delayed.
Step 6 — Wait 30 days. The PIO must reply within 30 days of receiving your application under Section 7(1) — 48 hours where the information concerns the life or liberty of a person (which scholarship queries normally do not). If no reply arrives in 30 days, it is a deemed refusal under Section 7(2), and the information, if supplied later, must be provided free of charge under Section 7(6).
Drafting this letter from scratch is the slowest part. You can use our free AI RTI Draft App at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html to describe your scholarship problem in plain Hindi or English and get a ready-to-file Section 6(1) application with your identifiers pre-filled.
Anjali K., B.Com second year, SC category, district headquarter town, Uttar Pradesh.
Scheme: Post-Matric Scholarship for SC Students, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, applied via NSP. Renewal for 2025-26, logged 12 September 2025. NSP Application ID: UP2025XXXXXXXXXX (last 6 digits withheld). Bank account: State Bank of India, home branch.
NSP status on 15 January 2026: Institute verified (24 October 2025), DNO verified (2 December 2025), SNO verified (18 December 2025), overall “Approved”. No bank credit for 70 days after SNO verification.
Pre-RTI check: PFMS Track NSP Payments (https://pfms.nic.in/SitePages/TrackNSPpayments.aspx) searched by NSP Application ID showed FTO generated on 28 December 2025, status “Pending” at the bank. This pointed the delay to the bank/PFMS layer, not the verification chain.
RTI filed online through rtionline.gov.in on 20 January 2026 to the CPIO, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Rs.10 paid by UPI. Six questions asked: verification log, institute submission date, DNO/SNO sanction date, PFMS FTO number and UTR, bank pre-validation result with failure reason, and the specific hold-up ground.
Reply received 12 February 2026 (within 30 days): FTO number and date confirmed, UTR not yet generated, bank pre-validation failed with reason “name mismatch — bank account holder name does not match Aadhaar name”. The rejection had been silently queued for the next re-attempt batch.
Fix: Anjali visited her SBI branch, corrected the account-holder name to exactly match Aadhaar, and re-seeded Aadhaar with the bank. She also updated the NPCI Aadhaar-bank mapper. Next PFMS batch credited the scholarship to her account on 5 March 2026.
Total cost of the RTI route: Rs.10 and one online application. Time from RTI filing to money in bank: 44 days.
To, The Central Public Information Officer, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, [Address as listed on the ministry's RTI page] Subject: Request for information under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, regarding my scholarship application on the National Scholarship Portal. Sir/Madam, I, [Full Name], citizen of India, resident of [Full Postal Address], hereby request the following information under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Under Section 6(2) I am not required to state any reason for seeking this information. Identification particulars: Scheme name: Post-Matric Scholarship for SC Students, 2025-26 NSP Application ID: [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX] Institute name and AISHE code: [College name], AISHE [XXXXXX] Aadhaar (last 4 digits): XXXX Bank account (last 4 digits): XXXX Date of application on NSP: [DD/MM/YYYY] Please furnish the following information: 1. The complete progress log of my NSP application, with the date on which each level — Institute Nodal Officer, District Nodal Officer, State Nodal Officer and the Ministry — verified or sanctioned the application, under Section 6(3) read with Section 7(1) of the RTI Act. 2. The date on which the Institute Nodal Officer of [College name, AISHE code] submitted the verification of my application, and whether it was approved or returned, with the reference number. 3. The date on which the District Nodal Officer and State Nodal Officer sanctioned my application and forwarded it to the Ministry, with reference numbers. 4. The Fund Transfer Order (FTO) number, FTO date and Unique Transaction Reference (UTR) for the last attempted disbursement against my application, as recorded in the Public Financial Management System (PFMS). 5. The result of the PFMS bank-account pre-validation for my application — success or failure — and if failed, the exact failure reason recorded (name mismatch, IFSC mismatch, Aadhaar not seeded, NPCI mapper mismatch, or other), with the date of the failure. 6. If the disbursement is held up or rejected, the specific ground of hold-up and the scheme clause or guideline relied upon, with the date the hold-up was recorded. I have paid the application fee of Rs.10 through rtionline.gov.in (Registration No. [XXXXXXXXX]) / by Indian Postal Order No. [XXXXX] dated [DD/MM/YYYY] for Rs.10 in favour of the Accounts Officer of the Ministry. I declare that I am a citizen of India. The information sought is not exempt under Section 8 or 9 of the RTI Act. If the information is held by another public authority, I request transfer of this application under Section 6(3) within five days of receipt. Yours faithfully, [Signature] [Name] [Date, Place]
If the PIO's reply is vague, silent, or refuses without citing an exemption, file a First Appeal under Section 19(1) within 30 days to the First Appellate Authority of the same ministry. Our free First Appeal App at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html drafts this for you from the PIO's reply. If the FAA also fails, file a Second Appeal under Section 19(3) to the Central Information Commission (for Central ministries) within 90 days — there is no fee for a CIC second appeal.
Use the NSP RTI Contact tool at https://nsp.gov.in/NSPADMIN/RTIContact, enter your application ID, and the tool names the scheme-owning ministry or department. File your RTI to the CPIO of that ministry through rtionline.gov.in. Do not file to MeitY or to “NSP” — they run the portal software but do not sanction or disburse scholarships, and your application will be transferred under Section 6(3), costing you five days. For a deeper NSP-specific walkthrough, see NSP scholarship not credited in 2026? Use RTI to find out exactly.
Usually no. PFMS, run by the Office of the Controller General of Accounts in the Ministry of Finance, is the payment processor, but the scheme-owning ministry holds the sanction record and the FTO instruction. File to the ministry first and ask for the FTO number and UTR in your RTI — the ministry can pull the PFMS record. If the ministry's reply points only to PFMS and you still cannot get the UTR, you can then file a narrow RTI to the CPIO, Office of the CGA, for the PFMS transaction log for your FTO number.
File a parallel RTI to the CPIO of your college (or the Registrar of the affiliating university, if your college is affiliated). The Institute Nodal Officer is a college official, not a ministry official, so the ministry cannot reach into the college's verification queue. Ask for the date your application was forwarded to the INO, the date the INO verified or returned it, and the reason if it was returned. A separate complaint to the State Higher Education Council or the Director of Collegiate Education often speeds this up. See post-matric-scholarship-stuck-institute-verification for the institute-level escalation path.
No. The CIC can order disclosure of information — it can force the ministry to put the verification dates, FTO number, UTR and the hold-up reason on record. It cannot order disbursement. But in practice, once the stuck step is on record, the ministry usually fixes it (a bank pre-validation failure gets re-queued, an unverified file gets verified) because the file is now visible. The disbursement follows from fixing the identified step. If the hold-up is an eligibility dispute rather than a process delay, you may need a representation or a writ, not just an RTI.
No. Under the proviso to Section 7(5) of the RTI Act and Rule 5 of the Right to Information Rules, 2012, a BPL applicant is exempt from the application fee, but you must attach a copy of your BPL certificate with the application. The same exemption applies to most state RTI Rules, though a few states have additional categories (such as women applicants in some states). Check your state's RTI Rules on the RTI Fees by State and Online Portal Directory (2026) page.
A Fund Transfer Order (FTO) is the instruction the scheme-owning ministry raises in PFMS to pay a batch of beneficiaries. Each beneficiary in the FTO carries a Unique Transaction Reference (UTR) once the bank accepts the credit. The UTR is the proof that the money actually left the government account and reached your bank. If the UTR has not been generated, the credit has not been sent — the FTO exists but the bank has not accepted it, usually because of a pre-validation failure. Asking for the FTO number and the UTR in your RTI is the single most powerful question, because it forces the ministry to tell you whether the money has actually moved.
Pre-validation checks the IFSC, account-holder name and Aadhaar-seeding at the time the FTO is generated. But the actual credit goes through the NPCI Aadhaar-bank mapper, which can be out of sync with your bank's records — especially after a branch change, a name correction, or a recent Aadhaar update. The FTO may pass pre-validation and still fail at the NPCI mapper stage. Ask in your RTI for the “specific failure reason recorded in PFMS”, which will distinguish a name mismatch, an IFSC mismatch, an Aadhaar-not-seeded status, or an NPCI mapper mismatch. Each has a different fix at your bank. See Aadhaar update stuck for weeks? File an RTI to UIDAI and get a and aadhaar-seeding-failed-lpg-ration-pension for the bank-side fix.
Yes, if both are for the same scheme and the same NSP account. List both application IDs in the identification particulars and ask the questions for each. If the schemes are different (for example, a Post-Matric SC application and a separate Merit-cum-Means Minorities application), file two separate RTIs to the two different scheme-owning ministries, because they are different public authorities.
That is an incomplete reply. File a First Appeal under Section 19(1) within 30 days, arguing that the PIO has not furnished the “specific ground of rejection and the scheme clause relied upon”, which you asked for. The FAA must dispose of the appeal within 30 days, extendable to 45 with reasons. If the FAA also does not give the ground, file a Second Appeal to the Central Information Commission under Section 19(3) within 90 days. A rejection without a stated ground is exactly the kind of opaque decision the RTI Act was written to crack open.
This page is the general overview — it covers both Central (NSP) and state welfare scholarships, and helps you locate which of the three verification levels or the PFMS payment layer is the stuck step. Scholarship not credited — RTI to track status and force disbursal is the narrower page for a simple status check (where is my application in the queue), and NSP scholarship not credited in 2026? Use RTI to find out exactly is the NSP-specific deep dive. If your scholarship is a state welfare scheme rather than an NSP scheme, start here. If it is an NSP scheme and the money is approved-but-unpaid, go to the NSP page after reading this one.
Last reviewed: 4 July 2026.