Last reviewed: 20 August 2026. Portals checked against unifiedportal-mem.epfindia.gov.in, Pension on Higher Wages, epfigms.gov.in, and the Supreme Court judgment of 4 November 2022.
Quick answer: Track a 2023 joint option on EPFO's Pension on Higher Wages page and copy the application ID. If the file is stuck, register on EPFiGMS, then file RTI under §6(1) to the CPIO of your EPFO regional office. Reply is due in 30 days under §7(1).
If you only have 2 minutes: open Track application status for Pension on Higher Wages, note the ID and the wording on screen, then draft RTI with the AI RTI Drafter if the file has not moved. Read The RTI Playbook for the 30-day clock.
Under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, pensionable salary is ordinarily capped. A joint option by member and employer lets eligible members contribute to EPS on actual wages above that ceiling, so the later pension can be computed on the higher salary. EPFO labels this Pension on Higher Wages. It is not a new scheme. It is an option inside EPS-95 after the Supreme Court judgment of 4 November 2022.
This page is for people who already applied in the 2023 online window and are waiting for an order. It is not an invitation to file a fresh joint option in 2026.
Do not assume a fresh member window is open in 2026. Confirm only on the live EPFO portals below.
Step 1 — Open the official member surface
Step 2 — Track Pension on Higher Wages
Step 3 — Use only the portal's own tools
| Detail | Where you find it |
|---|---|
| UAN | EPFO member login / UMANG EPFO services |
| Application / tracking ID | PoHW track page or acknowledgement from 2023 |
| Exact status text and date | Screenshot of the tracker, with the date visible |
| PPO number | If you already draw EPS pension |
| Establishment / PF code | Member passbook or employer |
| Regional office | The office shown against your establishment on EPFO records |
There is no verified all-India settlement clock of 15 days, or any other fixed number of days, for a higher-pension order. PIB 2085518 itself recorded lakhs of applications still pending with employers in December 2024. Typical recorded causes, which you should ask the PIO to confirm on your file, include:
| What you see or hear | What to do |
|---|---|
| Pending with employer / wage details | Write to the employer; ask RTI for the date wage data was received |
| Pending at field / regional office | EPFiGMS, then RTI for dues stage and pending officer |
| Clarification sought | Reply on the portal / through the employer; keep the query text |
| Dues computed / demand generated | Pay or contest only against the written demand; keep the challan |
| Rejected | Ask for the rejection note under RTI; then first appeal if the RTI reply is hollow |
A grievance asks for action. An RTI asks for recorded facts. Use both.
Then file RTI to the CPIO, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office that holds your account. Central RTI fee is ₹10 (see state / central fee table if you file on paper through a different route).
Generate a filled draft with the AI RTI Drafter. Track the 30-day clock with the Timeline Tracker. If the PIO is silent, use the First Appeal Builder.
To The Central Public Information Officer Employees' Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office [city / region that holds my account] Subject: Information under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 — Pension on Higher Wages application [ID] I am a citizen of India. UAN / PPO: [NUMBER]. Application for Validation of Option / Joint Option ID: [ID], dated [DATE]. 1. Current status of the said application as recorded in the office, with the date of that status. 2. Name, designation and sitting of the official with whom the file is pending, and from which date. 3. Date on which employer wage details for the relevant period were received, or a written statement that they are not received. 4. Present stage of dues / arrears computation, and copy of any demand, query or rejection note on the file. 5. File-movement register / noting from receipt of the application to today. 6. If any part of this information is held by another public authority, transfer that part under Section 6(3) and inform me. Please provide the information within 30 days under Section 7(1). If the information is denied, state the clause and inform me of the first-appeal right under Section 19(1). [Name, address, mobile]
Typical stuck file. A 2023 joint option still shows pending after the employer-upload dates notified by EPFO. The member screenshots the PoHW tracker, files EPFiGMS with the application ID, then files the RTI above asking for the date wage data was received and the name of the pending officer. Once those facts are on a dated RTI reply, the next step is either an employer letter or a first appeal under §19(1) — not a second anonymous grievance.
Open Pension on Higher Wages and use Track application status, or sign in at the member portal. Copy the application ID and the exact status text.
PIB Release ID 2085518 records that the last date for members to submit Applications for Validation of Option / Joint Options was 11 July 2023. Later dates were employer-side upload extensions. Confirm on the live EPFO portal. Do not rely on a WhatsApp claim that a new member window is open.
Common recorded causes are missing employer wage details, a pending query, or dues computation at the regional office. There is no verified 15-day disposal clock for this order. Ask the CPIO for the reason on your file.
EPFiGMS is EPFO's grievance system. It generates a registration number and is meant to trigger action. It has no RTI-style 30-day statutory clock. RTI under §6(1) asks for recorded status, noting and officer name, with a 30-day duty under §7(1).
Yes. EPFO is a statutory body discharging public functions under the 1952 Act. Address the CPIO of the regional office that holds your account. If the request lands in the wrong office, §6(3) requires transfer.
Silence after 30 days is deemed refusal. File a first appeal under §19(1) to the First Appellate Authority in the same office. Use the First Appeal Builder. Second appeal on RTI lies to the Central Information Commission, not to the EPF Appellate Tribunal.
The Supreme Court held that employees who retired before 1 September 2014 without exercising any option under paragraph 11(3) had already exited the scheme and are not entitled to the further-chance directions. Members who had exercised option before that date, and members who were in service as on 1 September 2014, were treated differently. Read the judgment against your own dates; do not assume coverage.
G.S.R. 609(E) dated 22 August 2014, upheld by the Court, limits maximum pensionable salary to ₹15,000 a month unless a valid higher-wage option is in place. Confirm the computation on your PPO / PoHW order, not on a social-media formula.
Reviewed on 20 August 2026 by Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak. Always confirm the live status on the official EPFO portal.