Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:sushil-kumar-rpo-bhopal-cic-2018 [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Compensation Rs. 5,000 awarded under §198b for passport delay. Case: Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal — 2018 — RTI case law)}} | ||
| + | ====== Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 ====== | ||
| + | **Sushil Kumar v. RPO Bhopal** (Central Information Commission, 2018-04-19) // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Holding ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compensation Rs. 5,000 awarded under §19(8)(b) for passport delay. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where passport dispatch was delayed without reasonable cause beyond the Citizen Charter timeline, compensation under §19(8)(b) of the RTI Act of Rs. 5,000 was awarded to the applicant. Compensation must be specifically prayed in the appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section(s) applied ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Section 19(8)(b) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Practitioner takeaway ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Compensation under §19(8)(b) is real remedy; quantify loss in appeal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Citation: | ||
| + | * **Court:** Central Information Commission | ||
| + | * **Date:** 2018-04-19 | ||
| + | * **Outcome: | ||
| + | * **Reporter / Cause-list: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this case matters for citizens ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This ruling is part of the **300+ case-law corpus** at [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen action steps if your own RTI is being refused on similar grounds ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Day 30** — silence by PIO = deemed refusal under §7(2). File §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days using [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Day 60-90** — if FAA also refuses, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities). | ||
| + | - **Beyond 18 months pending** — writ petition under Article 226 to the High Court. | ||
| + | - **Parallel CPGRAMS complaint** at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citing this ruling in your appeal ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Use our [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related landmark RTI rulings ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Original case metadata — Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||