Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:scholarship-cic-2017 [2026/07/03 02:06] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-title=(CIC Scholarship Delay RTI Order 2017 India)& | ||
| + | ====== Central Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2017) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Central Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2017)** (Central Information Commission, 2017-06-15) // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Holding ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. Central Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section(s) applied ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Section 7 | ||
| + | * Section 4 | ||
| + | * Sub-section 7(1) | ||
| + | * Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Practitioner takeaway ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Citation: | ||
| + | * **Court:** Central Information Commission | ||
| + | * **Date:** 2017-06-15 | ||
| + | * **Outcome: | ||
| + | * **Reporter / Cause-list: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This ruling sits in the **Scholarship sanction / disbursal delay** topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with **Students stuck waiting for NSP / state scholarship sanction or DBT credit**. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, **the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005**, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Right authority to RTI for this topic ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **National Scholarship Portal (NSP) → respective Ministry (MoSJE for SC, MoTA for ST, MoMA for minorities, MoE for general); state DSWO/Tribal Welfare for state schemes** is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is **Constitution Articles 15(4), 46 (special provisions); | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common issues in this cluster ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Aadhaar-bank-account seeding mismatch; institute not verified on NSP; portal showing ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample RTI for this topic ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Current status of your **[[: | ||
| + | * Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer' | ||
| + | * Name, designation, | ||
| + | * The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal. | ||
| + | * Records relating to: NSP application movement, sanction file, UTR of payment, institute verification status, reasons for rejection. | ||
| + | * Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fastest path: use our [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Day 30**: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Day 60-90**: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities). | ||
| + | - **Beyond 18 months**: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court. | ||
| + | - Consider parallel **CPGRAMS complaint** at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related cases in this cluster ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * **Companion citizen guide**: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Original case metadata — Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||