Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | cases:ration-card-cic-2015 [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public. Central Information Commission — Ration card delay (2015) (Central Information Commission, 2015-06-15).) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Central Information Commission — Ration card delay (2015) — 2015 — RTI case law)}} | ||
| + | ====== Central Information Commission — Ration card delay (2015) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Central Information Commission — Ration card delay (2015)** (Central Information Commission, 2015-06-15) // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Holding ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Ratio ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public. Central Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section(s) applied ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Section 7 | ||
| + | * Section 4 | ||
| + | * Sub-section 7(1) | ||
| + | * Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Practitioner takeaway ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Citation: | ||
| + | * **Court:** Central Information Commission | ||
| + | * **Date:** 2015-06-15 | ||
| + | * **Outcome: | ||
| + | * **Reporter / Cause-list: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This ruling sits in the **Ration card delay** topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with **Citizens stuck waiting for a ration card / FPS issue / NFSA enrolment**. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, **the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005**, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Right authority to RTI for this topic ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs at the district + state level (also called Food and Supplies Department in some states)** is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is **National Food Security Act 2013 (NFSA) + state Public Distribution System Control Orders + state-level rules**. The citizen charter / SLA is: 30-90 days from application to issue, varying by state. NFSA has overriding statutory mandate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common issues in this cluster ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | NFSA list not refreshed; new family member not added; cancellation without notice; FPS dealer harassment; deduplication issues with Aadhaar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample RTI for this topic ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Current status of your **[[: | ||
| + | * Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer' | ||
| + | * Name, designation, | ||
| + | * The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal. | ||
| + | * Records relating to: FPS dealer log, beneficiary list, NFSA inclusion criteria, deduplication report, Aadhaar seeding status. | ||
| + | * Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fastest path: use our [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Day 30**: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https:// | ||
| + | - **Day 60-90**: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities). | ||
| + | - **Beyond 18 months**: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court. | ||
| + | - Consider parallel **CPGRAMS complaint** at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related cases in this cluster ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * **Companion citizen guide**: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Original case metadata — Related ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||