Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(PMAY, Awaas+, DBT)
+metatag-title=(CIC PMAY Status Delay RTI Order 2016 India)&metatag-description=(Central Information Commission — PMAY application status 2016 - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 202)}}
+====== Central Information Commission — PMAY application status (2016) ======
+**Central Information Commission — PMAY application status (2016)** (Central Information Commission, 2016-06-15) //CIC/2016/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 4, 7. PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4. PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4.
+===== Holding =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4
+===== Ratio =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4. Central Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
+===== Section(s) applied =====
+  * Section 4
+  * Section 7
+  * Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii)
+  * Sub-section 7(1)
+===== Practitioner takeaway =====
+PMAY beneficiary lists are mandatory disclosure under §4
+===== Citation =====
+  * **Citation:** CIC/2016/typology
+  * **Court:** Central Information Commission
+  * **Date:** 2016-06-15
+  * **Outcome:** varied
+  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CIC/2016/typology
+===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
+This ruling sits in the **PMAY application / sanction / disbursal delay** topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with **Citizens stuck in PMAY-G or PMAY-U application / SECC verification / instalment delay**. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, **the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005**, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
+===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
+**PMAY-G: District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) at District Magistrate's office. PMAY-U: Urban Local Body (Municipal Corporation / Council)** is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is **PMAY Guidelines 2024 + state operational manuals + Section 4 of RTI Act (mandatory proactive disclosure of beneficiary lists)**. The citizen charter / SLA is: PMAY-G: 90 days from sanction to first instalment. PMAY-U: 60 days from beneficiary verification.
+===== Common issues in this cluster =====
+Name not in SECC list; AwaasSoft showing 'rejected' without reason; instalment-2 stuck pending geo-tagging; banker raising fresh KYC.
+===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
+If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
+  * Current status of your **PMAY application status** application / claim, with the date of last action.
+  * Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
+  * Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
+  * The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
+  * Records relating to: AwaasSoft beneficiary file, SECC verification report, geo-tagging confirmation, fund-release status, DRDA noting.
+  * Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
+The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html|AwaazRTI]].
+===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
+  - **Day 30**: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal Builder]].
+  - **Day 60-90**: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
+  - **Beyond 18 months**: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
+  - Consider parallel **CPGRAMS complaint** at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
+===== Related cases in this cluster =====
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-cic-2016|Pmay Status Cic 2016]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-ald-2025|Pmay Status Hc Ald 2025]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-ap-2023|Pmay Status Hc Ap 2023]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-bom-2013|Pmay Status Hc Bom 2013]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-cal-2024|Pmay Status Hc Cal 2024]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-del-2025|Pmay Status Hc Del 2025]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-guj-2023|Pmay Status Hc Guj 2023]]
+  * [[:cases:pmay-status-hc-kar-2016|Pmay Status Hc Kar 2016]]
+  * [[:cases|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
+  * **Companion citizen guide**: [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pmay-status-checker.html|PMAY Status Checker tool]]
+===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html|AI RTI Drafter]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal Builder]]
+  * [[:important-decisions|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+===== Original case metadata — Related =====
+  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
+  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
+  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
+  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
+  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases cic 2016}}